Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nexus security: governance, innovation and the resilient city

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nexus security is a compound mix of ideas: reconciling human needs and wants with access to multiple resources; diversity of access to those resources and services; resilience in the face of weather- and climaterelated variability; resilience likewise in the face of infrastructure failure; and the personal, individual sense of belonging. At the level of Systems Thinking there is a very close relationship between resilience in the behavior of natural (ecological) systems and resilience in the social dynamics of governance within communities, where such resilience establishes the viability of these communities over centuries, which in turn entails successful stewardship of the man-environment relationship. We use insights from this cross-system mapping — across natural, built, and human systems — to assess, first, the role of city governance in achieving nexus security (or not) and, second, the role of technological innovations in serving the same purpose. More specifically, eight principles, covering resilience and diversity of access to resources and services, are used to gauge security-enhancing features of city buildings and infrastructure. Case studies include new designs of resilient office blocks, nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) recovery systems for sanitation and wastewater treatment, and the reconstruction of urban parks for the provision of ecosystem services. Throughout the paper, matters of risk in the face of meteorological variability are prominent. We do not conclude, however, that the presence of risk implies nexus insecurity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cook C, Bakker K. Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2012, 22(1): 94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. GWP. Towards Water Security: A Framework for Action. Stockholm: Global Water Partnership, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grey D, Sadoff C W. Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy, 2007, 9(6): 545–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rijsberman F R. Water scarcity: fact or fiction? Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 80(1–3): 5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Whittington D, Sadoff C W, Allaire M. The economic value of moving toward a more water secure world. TEC Background Paper No 18. Stockholm: Technical Committee (TEC), Global Water Partnership, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  6. Falkenmark M. The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa — why isn’t it being addressed? Ambio, 1989, 18(2): 112–118

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beck M B, Villarroel Walker R. On water security, sustainability, and the water-food-energy-climate nexus. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2013, 7(5): 626–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson M. A bit of the other: why scarcity isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010,127–142

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beck M B, Villarroel Walker R, Thompson M. Smarter urban metabolism: earth systems re-engineering. Proceedings of the ICE Engineering Sustainability, 2013, 166 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wolman A. The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 1965, 213(3): 179–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B. Understanding the metabolism of urban-rural ecosystems: a multi-sectoral systems analysis. Urban Ecosystems, 2012, 15(4): 809–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beck M B, Thompson M, Ney S, Gyawali D, Jeffrey P. On governance for re-engineering city infrastructure. Proceedings of the ICE — Engineering Sustainability, 2011, 164(2): 129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beck M B. Vulnerability of water quality in intensively developing urban watersheds. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2005, 20(4): 379–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beck M B. Cities as Forces for Good in the Environment: Sustainability in the Water Sector. Athens, Georgia: Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 2011 (online as http://cfgnet.org/archives/587)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holling C S. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze P, ed. Engineering within Ecological Constraints.Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996, 31–44

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4(1): 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taleb N N. Antifragile. Things that Gain from Disorder. New York: Random House, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  18. Beck MB.Transient pollution events: acute risks to the aquatic environment. Water Science and Technology, 1996, 33(2):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beck M B, Jiang F, Shi F, Villarroel Walker R, Osidele O O, Lin Z, Demir I, Hall J W. Re-engineering cities as forces for good in the environment. Proceedings of the ICE — Engineering Sustainability, 2010, 163(1): 31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peterson G, Allen C R, Holling C S. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems, 1998, 1(1): 6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehta L. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geels F. Co-evolution of technology and society: the transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930) — a case study in multi-level perspective. Technology in Society, 2005, 27(3): 363–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Geels F. The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930): the dynamics of regime transformation. Research Policy, 2006, 35(7): 1069–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WEF. Water Security: The Water-Food-Energy-Climate Nexus. World Economic Forum (WEF) Water Initiative. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maslow A H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 1943, 50(4): 370–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Arnstein S R. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35(4): 216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ney S. Resolving Messy Policy Problems: Handling Conflict in Environmental, Transport, Health and Ageing Policy. London: Earthscan, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thompson M. Man and nature as a single but complex system. In: Timmerman P, ed. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, Vol 5. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2002, 384–393

    Google Scholar 

  29. Holling C S. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In: Clark W C, Munn R E, eds. Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986, 292–317

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson M. Postscript: engineering and anthropology: is there a difference? In: Brown J, ed. Environmental Threats: Perception, Analysis and Management. New York: Belhaven, 1989, 138–150

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A. Cultural theory. Boulder, Colorado: West View, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gyawali D, Dixit A. The construction and destruction of scarcity in development: water and power experiences in Nepal. In: Mehta L, ed. 8The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 233–251

    Google Scholar 

  33. Calzadilla A, Rehdanz K, Tol R S J. The economic impact of more sustainable water use in agriculture: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 384(3–4): 292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fine B. Economics and scarcity: with Amartya Sen as a point of departure? In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 73–91

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson M. Beyond boom and bust. Royal Society of Arts Journal, 2008, (Winter): 34–39

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ingram D, Thompson M. Eyes wide open: Towards rational adaptability. Wilmott Magazine, 2010, 48(July): 60–64

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lietaer B, Ulanowicz R, Goerner S. Options for Managing a Systemic Bank Crisis. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating ENvironment & Society, SAPIENS [Online], 2009, 2(1). Available online at http://sapiens.revues.org/2747 (accessed April 6, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Moddemeyer S. Understanding the nature of change: building resilience into urban life. Water21, 2012, August: 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liao K H. A theory on urban resilience to floods: a basis for alternative planning practices. Ecology and Society, 2012, 17(4): 48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Everard M, Shuker L, Gurnell A. The Mayes Brook restoration in Mayesbrook Park, East London: An Ecosystem Services Assessment. Report. Bristol, UK: Environment Agency, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gatzweiler F W. Organizing a public ecosystem service economy for sustaining biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 2006, 59(3): 296–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rittmann B E. The energy issue in urban water management. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 13–27

    Google Scholar 

  43. Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B. Innovation, multi-utility service businesses and sustainable cities: where might be the next breakthrough? Water Practice & Technology, 2012, 7(5): doi: 10.2166/ wpt.2012.084

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fussler C. Responsible excellence pays. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2004, 16(September): 33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Villarroel Walker R. Sustainability beyond eco-efficiency: A multi-sectoral systems analysis of water, nutrients, and energy. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  46. Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B. How to re-balance the nitrogen metabolism of the Atlanta-Chattahoochee system? Paper presented at the Georgia Water Resources Conference, Athens, GA, USA. 2011. Available online at http://www.gawrc.org/2011proceedings.html (accessed May 6, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B, Hall JW.Water—and nutrient and energy — systems in urbanizing watersheds. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2012, 6(5): 596–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Barles S. Feeding the city: food consumption and flow of nitrogen, Paris, 1801–1914. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 375(1–3): 48–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Barles S. Urban metabolism and river systems: An historical perspective — Paris and the Seine, 1790–1970. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2007, 4(3): 1845–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mihelcic J R, Fry L M, Shaw R. Global potential of phosphorus recovery from human urine and feces. Chemosphere, 2011, 84(6): 832–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Schmid Neset T S, Bader H P, Scheidegger R, Lohm U. The flow of phosphorus in food production and consumption — Linköping, Sweden, 1870–2000. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 396(2–3): 111–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Drechsel P, Erni M. Analysing the nexus of sanitation and agriculture at municipal scale. Urban Agriculture Magazine, 2010, 23(April): 11–12

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dagerskog L, Coulibaly C, Ouandaoga I. The emerging market of treated human excreta in Ouagadougou. Urban Agriculture Magazine, 2010, 23(April): 45–48 (available at http://www.ruaf.org; accessed May 6, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Force J. The ultimate recycling. Treatment Plant Operator, 2011, September: 12–17

    Google Scholar 

  55. Krchnak K M, Smith D M, Deutz A. Putting nature in the Nexus: Investing in natural infrastructure to advance water-energy-food security. Background paper for stakeholder engagement process, Bonn2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia

  56. Pellett K. Salmon river watershed enrichment for fish habitat restoration. Report (Project # 09.CBR.03). Nanaimo, British Columbia: British Columbia Conservation Foundation, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  57. Londong J. Practical experience with source separation in Germany. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 423–430

    Google Scholar 

  58. Truffer B, Binz C, Gebauer H, Störmer E. Market success of on-site treatment: A systemic innovation problem. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 209–223

    Google Scholar 

  59. Harrington E. Building a coastal wetland in the heart of a city. Nature, 2012, 486(7402): 189

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fitzpatrick C. Sustainable shopping at London’s Westfield Stratford city. Water21, 2012, February: 18

    Google Scholar 

  61. Salingaros N A. Principles of Urban Structure. Amsterdam: Techne Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  62. Crutzen P J, Beck M B, Thompson M. (2007) Cities. Blue Ribbon Panel on Grand Challenges for Engineering, US National Academy of Engineering. Available, online at http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/7125/8602.aspx (accessed May 6, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  63. D’Arcy B. SUDS mania in Tasmania: leading the way in sustainable urban drainage. Water21, 2012, February: 34–36

    Google Scholar 

  64. Force J. Treepeople spreads the word on sustainable stormwater management. Water21, 2012, February: 28–30

    Google Scholar 

  65. Olsson G. The potential of control and monitoring. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 179–192

    Google Scholar 

  66. Beck M B, Villarroel Walker R, Thompson M. Changing the metabolism of coupled human-built-natural systems. In: Dawson R J, Walsh C L, Kilsby C G, eds. Earth Systems Engineering 2012: A Technical Symposium on Systems Engineering for Sustainable Adaptation to Global Change. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Centre for Earth Systems Engineering Research, Newcastle University, 2012, 11–32

    Google Scholar 

  67. Stenström T A. Hygiene, a major challenge for source separation and decentralization. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 151–161

    Google Scholar 

  68. Billen G, Garnier J, Barles S. History of the urban environmental imprint: introduction to a multidisciplinary approach to the longterm relationships between western cities and their hinterland. Regional Environmental Change, 2012, 12(2): 249–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Kim E, Barles S. The energy consumption of Paris and its supply areas from the eighteenth century to the present. Regional Environmental Change, 2012, 12(2): 295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Marsden T, Sonnino R. Human health and wellbeing and the sustainability of urban-regional food systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2012, 4(4): 427–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602-2152, USA

    Michael Bruce Beck & Rodrigo Villarroel Walker

Authors
  1. Michael Bruce Beck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodrigo Villarroel Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Bruce Beck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beck, M.B., Villarroel Walker, R. Nexus security: governance, innovation and the resilient city. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 7, 640–657 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0549-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0549-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation