Skip to main content
Log in

Making central-local relations work: Comparing America and China environmental governance systems

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The challenge of making central requirements work at local levels is a common problem for environmental governance throughout the world. Countries can learn from one another's approaches, but must understand the local context in which they are set. This paper compares the features of the China and US environmental governance systems that need be understood by those working between the systems. Key features include: (1) common values which shape the environmental governance choices in both countries, but which may have different practical meanings in each country; (2) America's common law-based environmental governance system, and China's civil law system, which involves plan(s) as well as law; (3) America's Federal central-local system, and China's unitary central local system. This paper concludes by suggesting areas in which further comparative understanding may be of value, including: (1) better understanding of the role of plan and law in China's governance system; (2) comparing the American Federal-state agreement system for implementation of environmental law with the China central-local system of target responsibility agreements for plan implementation; (3) improving understanding of nongovernmental resources needed to assure compliance with environmental laws and plans; (4) identifying institutions that can coordinate central-local and cross-border environmental governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guttman D. Gobierno a gobernanza: La nueva ideologie de rendicion de cuentes. Gestiony Politica Publica, 2004, 23: 1 (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salamon L. The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Madison J. Federalist Paper Number 10. 1787 http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/7.htm/

  4. Lindblom C. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 1959, 19: 79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mason A T. Brandeis: A Free Man's Life. New York, USA: The Viking Press, 1948

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kluger R. Simple Justice. New York, USA: Vintage Books, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martin J. Nader, Crusader, Spoiler, Icon. New York, USA: Basic Books, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 1968, 162: 1,243–1,248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Information Office of the State Council of China. White Paper on Environmental Protection in China, 1996–2005, 2006

  10. Potter D. People of Plenty: Economic Abundance and the American Character. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lazarus R. The Making of Environmental Law. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dye T R. American Federalism: Competition among Governments. Lexington, USA: Lexington Books, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  13. Revesz R L. Rehabilitating interstate competition: Rethinking the race to the bottom rationale for environmental regulation. 67 N. Y.U. Law Rev, 1992, 1,210

  14. Porter M E, van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitive relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 1995, 9(4): 97–118

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rabe B. Statehouse to Greenhouse: The Evolving Politics of American Climate Change Policy. Washington D.C., USA: Brookings Institution Press, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Federal Facilities Compliance Act Public Law. 1992, 102–386

  17. O'Leary R, Durant R, Fiorino D, Weiland P. Managing the Environment: Understanding the Legal, Organizational and Policy Changes. San Francisco, USA: Jossey Bass, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shirk S. The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oi J C. Rural China Takes Off: The Institutional Foundations of Reform. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  20. von Rooij B. Regulating Land and Pollution in China: Lawmaking, Compliance and Enforcement. Theory and Cases. Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University Press, 2006, 264

    Google Scholar 

  21. In the 2005 Song Hua River oil spill, for example, the polluter was part of a state owned enterprise. Wang Y, Duan H, Wang F. The Pain of the Songhua River Oil Spill. Caijing Magazine, 2005, http://www.caijing.com.cn

  22. Upham F. Mythmaking in the Rule of Law Orthodoxy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Working Paper 30. 2002

  23. Carothers T. Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad. Washington D.C., USA: Carnegie Endowment Press, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peerenboom R. China's Long March Towards Rule of Law, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lubman S. Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China after Mao. Palo Alto, USA: Stanford University Press, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huang P C C. Civil Justice in China: Representation and Practice in the Qing. Palo Alto, USA: Stanford University Press, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gilmore G. The Ages of American Law. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  28. Posner R. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chase O. Law, Culture and Ritual: Disputing Systems in Cross Cultural Context. New York, USA: New York University Press, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guttman D. American Citizen Suits. World Environment, 2006, 6: 14–17 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Curriden Mark. Power of 12. ABA Journal, August 21, 2000

  32. Fiss O, Rendlemen D. Injunctions. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Foundation Press, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rechtschaffen C. Antolini D. Creative Common Law Strategies for Protecting the Environment. Washington D.C., USA: US Environmental Law Institute, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  34. May J R. Now more than ever: Environmental citizen suit trends. Environmental Law Reporter, 2003, 33, 20704

    Google Scholar 

  35. Revesz R. Foundations of Environmental Law and Policy. New York, USA: Foundation Press, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  36. Percival R, Chris S, Miller A. Environmental Regulation: Law, Science and Policy. 5th ed. New York, USA: Aspen Publishers, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  37. Plater Z, Abrams R, Goldfarb W. Environmental Law and Policy: A Coursebook on Nature, Law and Society. 2nd ed. St. Paul, USA: West Publishing Company, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  38. Austin J, Carter II J M, Klein B, Schang S. A “Hard Look” at Judicial Decisionmaking under the National Environmental Policy Act. Washington D.C., USA: Environmental Law Institute. http://www.endangeredlaws.org/

  39. Houck O. Tales from a troubled marriage: Science and law in environmental policy. Science, 2003, 302(5652): 1,926–1,929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Houck O. The Clean Water Act TMDL Program: Law, Policy and Implementation. 2nd ed. Washington D.C., USA: Environmental Law Institute, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen J. The Jurisdynamics of Environmental Protection: Change and the Pragmatic Voice in Environmental Law. Washington D.C., USA: Environmental Law Institute, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sunstein C. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kargman S. OMB Intervention in Agency Rulemaking: The Case for Broadened Record Review. Yale Law Journal, 1986, 95: 1,789–1,610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kagan E. Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review, 2001, 114: 2,245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Radin B. Developments in the Federal Performance Management Movement: Balancing Conflict Values in GPRA and PART. In: Stanton T, ed. Meeting the Challenge of 911: Blueprints for Effective Government. Armonk, USA: ME Sharpe, 199–215

  46. Peterson P, Rabe B, Wong K. When Federalism Works. Washington D.C., USA: Brookings Institution Press, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nice D. Federalism: The Politics of Intergovernmental Relations. New York, USA: St. Martin's Press, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  48. Baumgartner B. SWANNC's clear statement: A delimitation of Congress’ commerce clause authority to regulate water pollution. Michigan Law Review, 2005, 212: 2,137

    Google Scholar 

  49. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Governance in China. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2005, 119

    Google Scholar 

  50. Guttman D. Public Purpose and Private Service: The Evolving Law of Diffused Sovereignty. Administrative Law Review, 2000, 52: 859–926

    Google Scholar 

  51. Guttman D. Inherently governmental functions: The legacy of 20th century reform. In: Stanton T, Ginsberg B, eds. Making Government Manageable. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  52. Guttman D. Organizational conflict of interest and the growth of big government. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 1978, 15: 297

    Google Scholar 

  53. Guttman D. Nuclear weapon. Environmental Forum, November–December 2000, 18–33

  54. U.S. National Academy of Public Administration. Environmental Gov: Transforming Environmental Protection for the 21st Century. Washington D.C., USA: National Academy of Public Administration, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  55. Findley R W, Farber D A, Freeman J. Cases and Materials on Environmental Law. St. Paul, USA: West Publishing Company, 2003, 334

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rechtschaffen C, Markell D L. Reinventing Environmental Enforcement and the State/Federal Relationship. Washington D.C., USA: Environmental Law Institute, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rabe, B. Power to the states: The promise and pitfalls of decentralization. In: Vig N J, Kraft M E, eds. Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century. 5th ed. Washington D.C., USA: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zimmerman J. Interstate Cooperation: Compacts and Administrative Agreements. Wesrport, USA: Praeger Publishers, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wang Y H. River Governance Structure in China: A Study of Water Quality and Quantity Management Regime. IDE Spot Survey, Tokyo, Japan: IDE, 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Guttman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guttman, D., Song, Y. Making central-local relations work: Comparing America and China environmental governance systems. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 1, 418–433 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-007-0068-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-007-0068-3

Keywords

Navigation