Abstract
The challenge of making central requirements work at local levels is a common problem for environmental governance throughout the world. Countries can learn from one another's approaches, but must understand the local context in which they are set. This paper compares the features of the China and US environmental governance systems that need be understood by those working between the systems. Key features include: (1) common values which shape the environmental governance choices in both countries, but which may have different practical meanings in each country; (2) America's common law-based environmental governance system, and China's civil law system, which involves plan(s) as well as law; (3) America's Federal central-local system, and China's unitary central local system. This paper concludes by suggesting areas in which further comparative understanding may be of value, including: (1) better understanding of the role of plan and law in China's governance system; (2) comparing the American Federal-state agreement system for implementation of environmental law with the China central-local system of target responsibility agreements for plan implementation; (3) improving understanding of nongovernmental resources needed to assure compliance with environmental laws and plans; (4) identifying institutions that can coordinate central-local and cross-border environmental governance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guttman D. Gobierno a gobernanza: La nueva ideologie de rendicion de cuentes. Gestiony Politica Publica, 2004, 23: 1 (in Spanish)
Salamon L. The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 2003
Madison J. Federalist Paper Number 10. 1787 http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/7.htm/
Lindblom C. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 1959, 19: 79–88
Mason A T. Brandeis: A Free Man's Life. New York, USA: The Viking Press, 1948
Kluger R. Simple Justice. New York, USA: Vintage Books, 2004
Martin J. Nader, Crusader, Spoiler, Icon. New York, USA: Basic Books, 2002
Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 1968, 162: 1,243–1,248
Information Office of the State Council of China. White Paper on Environmental Protection in China, 1996–2005, 2006
Potter D. People of Plenty: Economic Abundance and the American Character. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1958
Lazarus R. The Making of Environmental Law. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 2004
Dye T R. American Federalism: Competition among Governments. Lexington, USA: Lexington Books, 1990
Revesz R L. Rehabilitating interstate competition: Rethinking the race to the bottom rationale for environmental regulation. 67 N. Y.U. Law Rev, 1992, 1,210
Porter M E, van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitive relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 1995, 9(4): 97–118
Rabe B. Statehouse to Greenhouse: The Evolving Politics of American Climate Change Policy. Washington D.C., USA: Brookings Institution Press, 2004
The Federal Facilities Compliance Act Public Law. 1992, 102–386
O'Leary R, Durant R, Fiorino D, Weiland P. Managing the Environment: Understanding the Legal, Organizational and Policy Changes. San Francisco, USA: Jossey Bass, 1998
Shirk S. The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press, 1993
Oi J C. Rural China Takes Off: The Institutional Foundations of Reform. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press, 1999
von Rooij B. Regulating Land and Pollution in China: Lawmaking, Compliance and Enforcement. Theory and Cases. Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University Press, 2006, 264
In the 2005 Song Hua River oil spill, for example, the polluter was part of a state owned enterprise. Wang Y, Duan H, Wang F. The Pain of the Songhua River Oil Spill. Caijing Magazine, 2005, http://www.caijing.com.cn
Upham F. Mythmaking in the Rule of Law Orthodoxy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Working Paper 30. 2002
Carothers T. Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad. Washington D.C., USA: Carnegie Endowment Press, 2006
Peerenboom R. China's Long March Towards Rule of Law, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002
Lubman S. Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China after Mao. Palo Alto, USA: Stanford University Press, 1999
Huang P C C. Civil Justice in China: Representation and Practice in the Qing. Palo Alto, USA: Stanford University Press, 1999
Gilmore G. The Ages of American Law. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press, 1977
Posner R. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press, 1990
Chase O. Law, Culture and Ritual: Disputing Systems in Cross Cultural Context. New York, USA: New York University Press, 2006
Guttman D. American Citizen Suits. World Environment, 2006, 6: 14–17 (in Chinese)
Curriden Mark. Power of 12. ABA Journal, August 21, 2000
Fiss O, Rendlemen D. Injunctions. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Foundation Press, 1984
Rechtschaffen C. Antolini D. Creative Common Law Strategies for Protecting the Environment. Washington D.C., USA: US Environmental Law Institute, 2007
May J R. Now more than ever: Environmental citizen suit trends. Environmental Law Reporter, 2003, 33, 20704
Revesz R. Foundations of Environmental Law and Policy. New York, USA: Foundation Press, 1997
Percival R, Chris S, Miller A. Environmental Regulation: Law, Science and Policy. 5th ed. New York, USA: Aspen Publishers, 2006
Plater Z, Abrams R, Goldfarb W. Environmental Law and Policy: A Coursebook on Nature, Law and Society. 2nd ed. St. Paul, USA: West Publishing Company, 1998
Austin J, Carter II J M, Klein B, Schang S. A “Hard Look” at Judicial Decisionmaking under the National Environmental Policy Act. Washington D.C., USA: Environmental Law Institute. http://www.endangeredlaws.org/
Houck O. Tales from a troubled marriage: Science and law in environmental policy. Science, 2003, 302(5652): 1,926–1,929
Houck O. The Clean Water Act TMDL Program: Law, Policy and Implementation. 2nd ed. Washington D.C., USA: Environmental Law Institute, 2002
Chen J. The Jurisdynamics of Environmental Protection: Change and the Pragmatic Voice in Environmental Law. Washington D.C., USA: Environmental Law Institute, 2003
Sunstein C. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1996
Kargman S. OMB Intervention in Agency Rulemaking: The Case for Broadened Record Review. Yale Law Journal, 1986, 95: 1,789–1,610
Kagan E. Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review, 2001, 114: 2,245
Radin B. Developments in the Federal Performance Management Movement: Balancing Conflict Values in GPRA and PART. In: Stanton T, ed. Meeting the Challenge of 911: Blueprints for Effective Government. Armonk, USA: ME Sharpe, 199–215
Peterson P, Rabe B, Wong K. When Federalism Works. Washington D.C., USA: Brookings Institution Press, 1986
Nice D. Federalism: The Politics of Intergovernmental Relations. New York, USA: St. Martin's Press, 1987
Baumgartner B. SWANNC's clear statement: A delimitation of Congress’ commerce clause authority to regulate water pollution. Michigan Law Review, 2005, 212: 2,137
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Governance in China. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2005, 119
Guttman D. Public Purpose and Private Service: The Evolving Law of Diffused Sovereignty. Administrative Law Review, 2000, 52: 859–926
Guttman D. Inherently governmental functions: The legacy of 20th century reform. In: Stanton T, Ginsberg B, eds. Making Government Manageable. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004
Guttman D. Organizational conflict of interest and the growth of big government. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 1978, 15: 297
Guttman D. Nuclear weapon. Environmental Forum, November–December 2000, 18–33
U.S. National Academy of Public Administration. Environmental Gov: Transforming Environmental Protection for the 21st Century. Washington D.C., USA: National Academy of Public Administration, 2000
Findley R W, Farber D A, Freeman J. Cases and Materials on Environmental Law. St. Paul, USA: West Publishing Company, 2003, 334
Rechtschaffen C, Markell D L. Reinventing Environmental Enforcement and the State/Federal Relationship. Washington D.C., USA: Environmental Law Institute, 2003
Rabe, B. Power to the states: The promise and pitfalls of decentralization. In: Vig N J, Kraft M E, eds. Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century. 5th ed. Washington D.C., USA: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2003
Zimmerman J. Interstate Cooperation: Compacts and Administrative Agreements. Wesrport, USA: Praeger Publishers, 2002
Wang Y H. River Governance Structure in China: A Study of Water Quality and Quantity Management Regime. IDE Spot Survey, Tokyo, Japan: IDE, 2005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guttman, D., Song, Y. Making central-local relations work: Comparing America and China environmental governance systems. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 1, 418–433 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-007-0068-3
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-007-0068-3