Skip to main content
Log in

Vehicle path tracking by integrated chassis control

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The control problem of trajectory based path following for passenger vehicles is studied. Comprehensive nonlinear vehicle model is utilized for simulation vehicle response during various maneuvers in MATLAB/Simulink. In order to follow desired path, a driver model is developed to enhance closed loop driver/vehicle model. Then, linear quadratic regulator (LQR) controller is developed which regulates direct yaw moment and corrective steering angle on wheels. Particle swam optimization (PSO) method is utilized to optimize the LQR controller for various dynamic conditions. Simulation results indicate that, over various maneuvers, side slip angle and lateral acceleration can be reduced by 10% and 15%, respectively, which sustain the vehicle stable. Also, anti-lock brake system is designed for longitudinal dynamics of vehicle to achieve desired slip during braking and accelerating. Proposed comprehensive controller demonstrates that vehicle steerability can increase by about 15% during severe braking by preventing wheel from locking and reducing stopping distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WANG Guo-ye, ZHANG Juan-li, FEN Yan-li, ZHANG Yan-ru. Study on ESP control principle of light off-road vehicle based on brake/drive integrated control [J]. Physics Procedia, 2012, 25: 834–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. BLUNDELL M, HARTY D. Multibody systems approach to vechicle dynamics [M]. London, UK: 2nd Ed. 2015: 451–533.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. DU H, ZHANG N, NAGHDY F. Velocity-dependent robust control for improving vehicle lateral dynamics [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2011, 19(3): 454–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. TAVOOSIV, KAZEMI R, OVEISI A. Nonlinear adaptive optimal control for vehicle handling improvement through steer-by-wire system [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(1): 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. MAHMOODI-K M, JAVANSHIR I, ASADI K, AFKAR A, PAYKANI A. Optimization of suspension system of off-road vehicle for vehicle performance improvement [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(4): 902–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. HAMERSMA H A, SCHALKELS P. Improving the braking performance of a vehicle with ABS and a semi-active suspension system on a rough road [J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2014, 56: 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. WANG L, TAN L, AN L, WU Z, LI L. Study on the ESP system based on fuzzy logic pid control and multibody dynamics [J]. Journal of Electrical Systems, 2012, 8(1): 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. SONG J, CHE W S. Mechatronics comparison between braking and steering yaw moment controllers considering ABS control aspects [J]. Mechatronics, 2009, 19(7): 1126–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. LI B, DU H, LI W, ZHANG Y. Side-slip angle estimation based lateral dynamics control for omni-directional vehicles with optimal steering angle and traction/brake torque distribution [J]. Mechatronics, doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics. 2014. 12. 001.

  10. CHU L, GAO X, GUO J, LIU H, CHAO L, SHANG M. Coordinated control of electronic stability program and active front steering [J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 12: 1379–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. KECECI E F, TAO G. Adaptive vehicle skid control [J]. Mechatronics, 2006, 16(15): 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. WANG X, FU M, MA H, YANG Y. Lateral control of autonomous vehicles based on fuzzy logic [J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2015, 34: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. FANG H D, CHEN J L, THUILOTB M. Robustanti-sliding control of autonomous vehicles in presence of lateral disturbances [J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2012, 19(5): 468–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. TALVALA K L, KRITAYAKIRANA K, GERDES J C. Pushingthelimits: From lane keeping to autonomous racing [J]. Annual Reviews in Control, 2011, 35(1): 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ZAKARIA M A, ZAMZURI H, MAZLAN S A, HAFIZ S M, ZAINAL F. Vehicle path tracking using future prediction steering control [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 41: 473–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. MASHADI B, MAHMOODI-K M, KAKAE A H, HOSEINI R. Vehicle path following in the presence of driver inputs [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, 2013, 227(2): 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  17. PEDRO J O, DANGOR M, OLUROTIMI A, DAHUNSI M, MONTAZ A. Intelligent feedback linearization control of nonlinear electrohydraulic suspension systems using particle swarm optimization [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 24: 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MOKHIAMAR O, ABE M. Active wheel steering and yaw moment control combination to maximize stability as well as vehicle responsiveness during quick lane change for active vehicle handling safety [J]. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs., Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2002, 216: 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. NAGAI M, HIRANO Y, YAMANAKA S. Integrated robust control of active rear wheel steering and direct yaw moment control [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 1998, 29: 416–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. MASHADI B, MAHMOODI-K M, AHMADIZADEH P, OVEISI A. A path-following driver/vehicle model with optimized lateral dynamic controller [J]. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 2014, 11(4): 613–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. FIALA E. Lateral forces on rolling pneumatic tires [J]. Zeitschrift V.D.I. 96, 1954, 29: 110–114. (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  22. CAGNINA L, ESQUIVEL S. A particle swarm optimizer for multi-objective optimization [M]. JCS, 2005: 204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  23. KENNEDY J, EBERHART J. The particle swarm: social adaption of knowledge [C]// Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Evol. Comput, Indianapolis, 1997, Indonesia, IN: IEEE Press, 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  24. RAJINIKANTH V, LATHA K. Particle swarm approach for identification of unstable processe [C]// Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers of Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications (FICTA), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2013, 199: 505–513.

    Google Scholar 

  25. MALIK S, DUTTA P, CHAKRABARTI S, BARMAN A. Parameter estimation of a PID controller using particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 2014, 3(3): 5827–5830.

    Google Scholar 

  26. YANG X J, WANG Z C, PENG W L. Coordinated control of AFS and DYC for vehicle handling and stability based on optimal guaranteed cost theory [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2009, 47(1): 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. ETEFFAGH M M, BEHKAMKIA D, PEDRAMMEHR S, ASADI K. Reliability analysis of bridge dynamic response in a stochastic vehicle-bridge interaction [J]. KSCE journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 19(1): 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyyed Hadi Taheri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salehpour, S., Pourasad, Y. & Taheri, S.H. Vehicle path tracking by integrated chassis control. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 1378–1388 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2655-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2655-y

Key words

Navigation