Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatio-temporal pattern and spatial heterogeneity of ecotones based on land use types of southeastern Da Hinggan Mountains in China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecotones have received great attention due to its critical function in energy flux, species harbor, global carbon sequestration, and land-atmosphere interaction. This study investigated land use pattern and spatial heterogeneity of the ecotones among agricultural land, forest land, and grassland of the southeastern Da Hinggan Mountains in the northeastern China. The change of these delineated ecotones under different slopes and aridity conditions was analyzed by two landscape indices, edge density (ED) and core area percentage of landscape (CPL), to explore the inter-linkage between spatial structure of ecotones and socioeconomic development and land management. Specifically, the ecotones such as agriculture-forest (AF) ecotone, forest-grassland (FG) ecotone, and agriculture-forest-grassland (AFG) ecotone moved from the arid southeast to the humid northwest. The flat area with small slope is more edge-fragmented than the steep area since the ED decreases as the slope increases. The AF ecotone mostly found in the humid region is moving to more humid areas while the agriculture-grassland (AG) ecotone mostly found in the dry region is moving towards the drier region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachelet D, Lenihan J M, Daly C et al., 2000. Interactions be tween fire, grazing and climate change at wind cave national park, SD. Ecological Modeling, 134(2–3): 229–244. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00343-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolome J, Franch J, Plaixats J et al., 2000. Grazing alone is not enough to maintain landscape diversity in the Montseny biosphere reserve. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 77(3): 267–273. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00086-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa K S, Joseph G, Setty S, 2007. Poverty, biodiversity and institutions in forest-agriculture ecotones in the western Ghats and eastern Himalaya ranges of India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 121(3): 287–295. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel J, Aronson J, 1999. Biology and Wildlife of the Mediterranean Region. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breshears D D, 2006. The grassland forest continuum: Trends in ecosystem properties for woody plant mosaics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(2): 96–104. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0096:Tgctie]2.0.Co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso M L, Pickett S T A, Weathers K C et al., 2003. An interdisciplinary and synthetic approach to ecological boundaries. Bioscience, 53(8): 717–722. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0717:Aiasat]2.0.Co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarero J J, Guiterrez E, Fortin M J, 2006. Spatial pattern of plant richness across treeline ecotones in the Pyrenees reveal different locations for richness and tree cover boundaries. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15(2): 182–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00211.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarero J J, Guti E, 2002. A multivariate approach to the study of the spatial structure of treeline ecotone. Community Ecology, 3(1): 9–18. doi: 10.1556/ComEc.3.2002.1.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y, He H S, Bishop I et al., 2007. Long-term forest landscape responses to fire exclusion in the Great Xing’an Mountains, China. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 16(1): 34–44. doi: 10.1071/Wf05093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Changnon S A, Kunkel K E, Winstanley D, 2002. Climate factors that caused the unique tall grass prairie in the central United States. Physical Geography, 23(4): 259–280. doi: 10.2747/0272-3646.23.4.259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Quangong, Zhang Jian, Yang Lina, 2007. GIS description of the Chinese ecotone between farming and animal husbandry. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 43(5): 24–28. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Xu, 1999. Frontier issue of modern ecology in the study of ecotone between agriculture and animal husbandry. Resources Science, 21(5): 1–8. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Choesin D, Boener R E J, 2002. Vegetation boundary detection: A comparison of two approaches applied to filed data. Plant Ecology, 158(1): 85–95. doi: 10.1023/A:1014720508155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai L, Zheng B, Shao G et al., 2006. The roles of a decision support system in applying forest ecosystem management in Northeast China. Science in China: Series E Technological Science, 49: 9–18. doi: 10.1007/s11431-006-8102-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danz N P, Reich P B, Frelich L E et al., 2011. Vegetation controls vary across space and spatial scale in a historic grass-forest biome boundary. Ecography, 34(3): 402–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06561.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Varela R A, Colombob R, Meroni M et al., 2010. Spatio-temporal analysis of alpine ecotones: A spatial explicit model targeting altitudinal vegetation shifts. Ecological Modelling, 221(4): 621–633. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorner B, Lertzman K, Fall J, 2002. Landscape pattern in topographically complex landscapes: Issues and techniques for analysis. Landscape Ecology, 17(8): 729–743. doi: 10.1023/A:1022944019665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutoit T, Buisson E, Gerbaud E et al., 2007. The status of transitions between cultivated fields and their boundaries: Ecotones, ecoclines or edge effects? Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology, 31(2): 127–136. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2006.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers R M, Didham R K, 2006. Continuous response functions for quantifying the strength of edge effects. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43(3): 527–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01151.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody G M, Boyd D S, 1999. Fuzzy mapping of tropical land cover along an environmental gradient from remotely sensed data with an artificial neural network. Journal of Geographical Systems, 1(1): 23–35. doi: 10.1007/s101090050003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman R T T, Gordron M, 1986. Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M J, Olson R J, Ferson S et al., 2000. Issues related to the detection of boundaries. Landscape Ecology, 15(5): 453–466. doi: 10.1023/A:1008194205292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B J, Chen L D, 2000. Agricultural landscape spatial pattern analysis in the semi-aridhill area of the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 44(3): 291–303. doi: 10.1006/jare.1999.0600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Bojie, 1995. The spatial pattern analysis of agricultural landscape in the loess area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 15(2): 113–120. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller D O, 2001. Forest fragmentation in Loudoun County, Virginia, USA evaluated with multitemporal landsat imagery. Landscape Ecology, 16(7): 627–642. doi: 10.1023/A:1013140101134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R H, Milne B T, Turner M G et al., 1987. Neural models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1(1): 19–28. doi: 10.1007/BF02275262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GLCF (Global Land Cover Facility), 2000. Global land cover facility. Available at: http://glcf.umiacs.umd.edu/ (Last accessed on 20 January 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson E J, Parker G R, 1992. Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial patterns. Landscape Ecology, 7(2): 101–110. doi: 10.1007/BF02418941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson E, 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems, 1(2): 143–156. doi: 10.1007/s100219900011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland M M, Risser P G, Naiman R J, 1991. Ecotones: The Role Oflandscape Boundaries in the Management and Restoration of Changing Environments. New York: Chapman and Hall, 142.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hufkens K, Scheunders P, Ceulemans R, 2009. Ecotones in vegetation ecology: Methodologies and definitions revisited. Ecological Research, 24(5): 977–986. doi: 10.1007/s11284-009-0584-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbernon J, Branthomme A, 2001. Characterization of landscape pattern of deforestration in tropical rain forest. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(9): 1753–1765. doi: 10.1080/01431160118426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquez G M, Maruca S, Fortin M J, 2000. From fields to object: A review of geographic boundary analysis. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2(3): 221–241. doi: 10.1007/PL00011456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph K B, David J B, Kevin M, 2004. Fragastas manual: Definition and description of class metric. Available at: http://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc98/proceed/to450/pap401/p401.htm (Last accessed on 12 December 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent M, Moyeed R A, Reid C L et al., 2006. Geostatistics, spatial rate of change analysis and boundary detection in plant ecology and biogeography. Progress in Physical Geography, 30(2): 201–231. doi: 10.1191/0309133306pp477ra

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer J A, Cairns D M, 1996. The suitability of montane ecotonesas indicators of global climatic change. Progress in Physical Geography, 20(3): 253–272. doi: 10.1177/030913339602000301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lele N, Joshi P K, Agrawal S P, 2008. Assessing forest fragmentation in northeastern region (NER) of India using landscape matrices. Ecological Indicators, 8(5): 657–663. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Liu M, Zhuang D et al., 2002. Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995–2000. Science in China (Series D), 32(12): 1031–1040. doi: 10.1360/03yd9033

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Junhui, Gao Jixi, 2008. Spatial changes of boundary based on land use and climate change in the farming-pastoral ecotone of northern China. China Environmental Science, 28(3): 203–209. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig J A, Cornelius J M, 1987. Locating discontinuities along ecological gradients. Ecology, 68(2): 448–450. doi: 10.2307/1939277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather A, 2000. South-north challenges in global forestry. In: Palo M et al. (eds.). World Forests from Deforestation to Transition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 128–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntire E J B, Fortin M J, 2006. Structure and function of wildfire and mountain pine beetle forest boundaries. Ecogeography, 29(3): 309–318. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04278.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman S P, Taylor A H, 2005. Pine forest expansion along a forest-meadow ecotone in northeastern California, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 215(1–3): 51–68. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R V, Ritters K H, Wichham J D et al., 1999. Landscape pattern metrics and regional assessment. Ecosystem Health, 5(4): 225–233. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0992.1999.09942.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton D R, 1975. A diversity index for quantifying habitat’edge’. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 3(4): 171–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitas I, 2000. Digital Image Processing Algorithms and Applications. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankey T, Montagne T, Graumlich C et al., 2006. Twentieth century forest-grassland ecotone shift in Montana underdiffering livestock grazing pressure. Forest Ecology and Management, 234(1–3): 282–292. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilthuizen M, 2000. Ecotone: Speciation-prone. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15(4): 130–131. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01839-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker N H, 1986. Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology, 77(4): 1210–1225. doi: 10.2307/2265590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer D L, Power M E, Fagan W F et al., 2003. A classification of ecological boundaries. Bioscience, 53(8): 723–729. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0723:Acoeb]2.0.Co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang J, Wang L, Yao Z, 2008. Analyses of urban landscape dynamics using multi-temporal satellite images: A comparison of two petroleum-oriented cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(4): 260–278. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.011

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang J, Wang L, Zhang S, 2005. Investigating landscape pattern and its dynamics in Daqing, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(8): 2259–2280. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0723:ACOEB]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timoney K P, Laroi G H, Dale M R T, 1993. Sub-arctic forest-tundra vegetation gradients—The sigmoid wave hypothesis. Journal of Vegetation Science, 4(3): 387–394. doi: 10.2307/3235597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner II B L, Lambin E F, Reenberg A, 2007. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(52): 20666–20671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704119104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M G, 2005. Landscape ecology: What is the state of the science? Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 36(1): 319–344. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UMASS, 2004. Landscape Ecology Program. Available at: http://umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/conceptual%20Background/Background%2OC.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Viedma O, Melia J, 1999. Monitoring temporal change in the spatial patterns of a Mediterranean shrubland using landsat TM images. Diversity and Distributions, 5(6): 275–293. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-4642.1999.00069.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J et al., 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325): 494–499. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Arx G, Bosshard A, Dietz H, 2002. Land-use intensity and border structures as determinants of vegetation diversity in an agricultural area. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, 68: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Zhao Y, Yin X et al., 2010. Land use and landscape pattern changes in Nenjiang River Basin during 1988-2002. Frontiers of Earth Science, 4(1): 33–41. doi: 10.1007/s11707-010-0006-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R H, 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 442(2): 207–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Chuanjun, Guo Huancheng, 1994. Land Use in China. Beijing: Science Press, 186. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye Baoying, Huang Fang, Zhang Shuwen et al., 2001. The driving forces of land use/cover change in the upstream area of the Nenjiang River. Chinese Geographical Science, 11(4): 377–381. doi: 10.1007/s11769-001-0054-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Guirui, He Honglin, Liu Xinan et al., 2004. Study on spatialization technology of terrestrial eco-information in China: The approach of spatialization in meteorology/climate information. Journal of Natural Resources, 19(4): 537–544. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Malanson G P, Butler D R, 2007. Geomorphological limits to self-organization of alpine forest-tundra ecotone vegetation. Geomorphology, 91(3–4): 378–392. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.04.019

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Halin, Zhao Xueyong, Zhang Tonghui et al., 2002. Boundary line on agro-pasture zigzag zone in North China and its problems on eco-environment. Advance in Earth Sciences, 17(5): 739–747. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China

    Lingxue Yu, Shuwen Zhang, Kun Bu & Jiuchun Yang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Lingxue Yu

  3. Bureau of Land and Resources of Linyi City, Linyi, 276000, China

    Tingxiang Liu

  4. Department of Geography and Environment Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA

    Junmei Tang

Authors
  1. Lingxue Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuwen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tingxiang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junmei Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kun Bu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiuchun Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuwen Zhang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of ‘Strategic Priority Research Program-Climate Change: Carbon Budget and Relevant Issues’ of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA05090310)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, L., Zhang, S., Liu, T. et al. Spatio-temporal pattern and spatial heterogeneity of ecotones based on land use types of southeastern Da Hinggan Mountains in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 25, 184–197 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0671-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0671-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation