Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Large-scale North American cancer survivorship surveys: 2011–2019 update

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There are gaps in our knowledge to provide quality cancer care to the growing numbers of survivors. Leveraging existing data to answer survivorship research questions is one approach to address these gaps. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to replicate and expand a previous report of existing cancer survivorship survey data.

Methods

We conducted a trifold search strategy for relevant surveys and data sets to (1) determine the extent to which cancer survivors are being surveyed, (2) determine the topics being covered in these surveys, and (3) create a compendium of information about these surveys and data sets, so researchers can conduct additional analyses.

Results

Thirty-five surveys were identified and included in this report; most were longitudinal studies (71%) in adult cancer survivors (91%). The domains addressed in these surveys were general medical characteristics, medical conditions, costs, employment, symptoms and/or side effects, psychosocial factors and coping, perceived quality of care, and health behaviors.

Conclusions

Existing data are available for researchers to explore new knowledge to enhance cancer survivorship quality care. This is an opportunity to fully utilize existing data to answer survivorship questions in a cost effective manner.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Survivors should be encouraged to participate in research studies as these data can close the gap in our knowledge and care of this growing population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer treatment & survivorship facts & figures 2019–2021. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Götze H, et al. Comorbid conditions and health-related quality of life in long-term cancer survivors-associations with demographic and medical characteristics. J Cancer Surviv. 2018;12(5):712–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cavers D, et al. Living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: a qualitative systematic review and evidence synthesis. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(1):148–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Miroševič Š, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with unmet needs in post-treatment cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28(3):e13060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lisy K, et al. Identifying the most prevalent unmet needs of cancer survivors in Australia: a systematic review. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019;15(5):E68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shakeel S, et al. Evaluation of factors associated with unmet needs in adult cancer survivors in Canada. Jama Network Open 2020;3(3).

  7. Shulman LN, Sheldon LK, Benz EJ. The future of cancer care in the United States-overcoming workforce capacity limitations. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(3):327–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takvorian SU, et al. Developing and sustaining an effective and resilient oncology careforce: opportunities for action. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112(7):663–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Weaver SJ, Jacobsen PB. Cancer care coordination: opportunities for healthcare delivery research. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8(3):503–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington. DC: National Academies Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rowland JH, et al. Survivorship science at the NIH: lessons learned from grants funded in fiscal year 2016. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(2):109–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobsen PB, et al. Identification of key gaps in cancer survivorship research: findings from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Survey. Journal of Oncology Practice. 2016;12(3):190–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kline RM, et al. Long-term survivorship care after cancer treatment - summary of a 2017 national cancer policy forum workshop. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(12):1300–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lerro CC, et al. A systematic review of large-scale surveys of cancer survivors conducted in North America, 2000–2011. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(2):115–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burris JL, Andrykowski MA. Physical and mental health status and health behaviors of survivors of multiple cancers: a national, population-based study. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42(3):304–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clarke TC, et al. Working with cancer: health and disability disparities among employed cancer survivors in the U.S. Prev Med. 2011;53(4–5):331–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson DE, et al. The health information national trends survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun. 2004;9(5):443–60; discussion 81–4.

  18. Short PF, Moran JR, Punekar R. Medical expenditures of adult cancer survivors aged <65 years in the United States. Cancer. 2011;117(12):2791–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith WA, et al. Physical activity among cancer survivors and those with no history of cancer- a report from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006. Am J Transl Res. 2011;3(4):342–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Adler GS. A profile of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Health Care Financ Rev. 1994;15(4):153–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. University of North Carolina Health Registry/Cancer Survivorship Cohort. Available from: https://unchealthregistry.com/.

  22. Your Voice Matters. Available from: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/cancer-care-ontario/programs/clinical-services/patient-family-engagement-experience/your-voice-matters.

  23. Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Screening Trial. Available from: https://prevention.cancer.gov/major-programs/prostate-lung-colorectal.

  24. Ambs A, et al. Overview of the SEER–Medicare Health Outcomes Survey linked dataset. Health Care Financ Rev. 2008;29(4):5–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Leach CR, et al. Preparedness and cancer-related symptom management among cancer survivors in the first year post-treatment. Ann Behav Med. 2017;51(4):587–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Parikh-Patel A, et al. Validation of self-reported cancers in the California Teachers Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(6):539–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Breast Cancer Family Registry Available from: http://www.bcfamilyregistry.org/.

  28. Pakiz B, et al. Correlates of quality of life in overweight or obese breast cancer survivors at enrollment into a weight loss trial. Psychooncology. 2016;25(2):142–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wallner LP, et al. Involvement of primary care physicians in the decision making and care of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(33):3969–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jenkins MA, et al. Cohort profile: the Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort (CCFRC). Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(2):387–388i.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ulrich CM, et al. The ColoCare Study: a paradigm of transdisciplinary science in colorectal cancer outcomes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28(3):591–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Veenstra CM, et al. Employment benefits and job retention: evidence among patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Med. 2018;7(3):736–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Staton AD, et al. Next-generation prognostic assessment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Future Oncol. 2015;11(17):2443–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cerhan JR, et al. Cohort profile: the lymphoma specialized program of research excellence (SPORE) molecular epidemiology resource (MER) cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(6):1753–1754i.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Newcomb LF, et al. Canary prostate active surveillance study: design of a multi-institutional active surveillance cohort and biorepository. Urology. 2010;75(2):407–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rare cancer genetics registry Available from: https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/survivor-cohort-resources/rcgr.html.

  37. National Wilms tumor study Available from: www.nwtsg.org.

  38. St. Jude LIFE Study Available from: https://www.stjude.org/research/initiatives/cancer-survivorship-research/st-jude-life-study.html.

  39. Friedman DL. The childhood cancer survivor study: an important research initiative for childhood cancer survivors. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1999;16(3):172–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bacon CG, et al. The impact of cancer treatment on quality of life outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1804–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bao Y, et al. Origin, methods, and evolution of the three nurses’ health studies. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(9):1573–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ambulatory Health Care Data. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/index.htm

  43. Barry M, et al. α-Methylacyl-CoA racemase expression and lethal prostate cancer in the physicians’ health study and health professionals follow-up study. Prostate. 2012;72(3):301–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Agricultural health study Available from: https://aghealth.nih.gov/.

  45. Bright-Gbebry M, et al. Use of multivitamins, folic acid and herbal supplements among breast cancer survivors: the Black women’s health study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011;11:30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kolonel LN, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(4):346–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Newcomb PA, et al. Colon Cancer Family Registry: an international resource for studies of the genetic epidemiology of colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(11):2331–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wallner LP, et al. Patient preferences for primary care provider roles in breast cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(25):2942–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. National Hospital Care Survey Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhcs/index.htm

  50. The Women’s Health Initiative Study Group. Design of the women’s health initiative clinical trial and observational study. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19(1):61–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Anderson GL, et al. Implementation of the women’s health initiative study design. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(9 Suppl):S5-17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gallicchio L, et al. Evidence gaps in cancer survivorship care: a report from the 2019 National Cancer Institute Cancer Survivorship Workshop. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021.

  53. Nekhlyudov L, et al. Developing a quality of cancer survivorship care framework: implications for clinical care, research, and policy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(11):1120–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Clarke SP, Cossette S. Secondary analysis: theoretical, methodological, and practical considerations. Can J Nurs Res. 2000;32(3):109–29 PMID: 11928128.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Jung was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) under Award Number T32NR007091. Dr. Mayer began work on this paper during the time she served as interim director of the Office of Cancer Survivorship, part of the National Cancer Institute’s Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Shelly S. Kay, Bonny Bloodgood Sheppard, and Jennifer L. Robinson. Data analysis was performed by Ahrang Jung. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ahrang Jung and Deborah Mayer. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah K. Mayer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A. Search strategies

Appendix A. Search strategies

PubMed search strategy

(“Cancer”[ti] OR “Cancers”[ti]) AND (“Cancer Survivors”[mh] OR “Survivor”[tiab] OR “Survivors”[tiab] OR “Survivorship”[tiab]) AND (“Surveys and Questionnaires”[mh] OR “Survey”[tiab] OR “Interview”[tiab] OR “Questionnaire”[tiab] OR “Surveys”[tiab] OR “Interviews”[tiab] OR “Questionnaires”[tiab]) AND (“North America”[mh]) AND (English[lang]) AND (“2011/01/01”[PDAT]: “3000/12/31”[PDAT]).

Web of Science search strategy

TITLE: (“Cancer” OR “Cancers”) AND TOPIC: ((“Cancer Survivors” OR “Survivor” OR “Survivors” OR “Survivorship”)) AND TOPIC: ((“Survey” OR “Interview” OR “Questionnaire” OR “Surveys” OR “Interviews” OR “Questionnaires”)) Refined by: LANGUAGES: (English) AND COUNTRIES/REGIONS: (USA OR Canada OR Mexico) Timespan: 2011–2018. Indexes: SCI-Expanded, SSCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, BKCI-S, BKCI-SSH, ESCI, CCR-Expanded, IC.

Scopus search strategy

(TITLE: (“Cancer” OR “Cancers”)) AND ((TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Survivor” OR “Survivors” OR “Survivorship”) OR INDEXTERMS (“Cancer Survivor”))) AND (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Survey” OR “Interview” OR “Questionnaire” OR “Surveys” OR “Interviews” OR “Questionnaires”)) AND (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2018) OR (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2017) OR (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2016) OR (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2015) OR (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2014) OR (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2013) OR (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2012) OR (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2011)) AND (LIMIT-TO ( AFFILCOUNTRY, “United States”) OR LIMIT-TO ( AFFILCOUNTRY, “Canada”) OR LIMIT-TO ( AFFILCOUNTRY, “Mexico”)) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”)).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, A., Kay, S.S., Robinson, J.L. et al. Large-scale North American cancer survivorship surveys: 2011–2019 update. J Cancer Surviv 16, 1236–1267 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01111-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01111-w

Keywords

Navigation