Skip to main content
Log in

Career readiness in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Adult survivors of childhood cancer experience difficulties in obtaining and maintaining employment. Employment-related challenges are associated with treatment-related health conditions and may also be related to vocational factors such as career readiness, skill acquisition, and work experience. Unfortunately, little is known about how treatment-, health-, and vocational-related factors interact to impact career development among childhood cancer survivors.

Methods

Three hundred eighty-five adult survivors of childhood cancer (42.1 % male, median age 38 years (21–62)), participating in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study, completed a work experiences survey that included measures of career readiness and vocational identity. Logistic regression was used to compare characteristics of survivors in the low career readiness category to those in the medium or high career readiness category, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was utilized to evaluate associations between career readiness, vocational identity, treatment intensity, and physical/emotional health.

Results

Low career readiness was prevalent in 17.4 % of survivors. Univariate analysis did not identify any significant associations between cancer treatment-related factors and career readiness. Unemployed survivors (odds ratio (OR) 2.3, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.2–4.5), those who were not college graduates (OR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.6–5.6), and those who had no personal income (OR 5.9, 95 % CI 1.7–30.9) were at increased risk of low career readiness. SEM indicated that associations between treatment intensity, physical health, age at diagnosis, and career readiness were mediated by emotional health and vocational identity. Sixty-three, 35, and 10 % of the variance in career readiness, vocational identity, and emotional health, respectively, were explained by this theoretical model.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that individuals who reported low levels of career readiness were more likely to be unemployed and earn less than US$40,000 per year and were less likely to graduate from high school. The final structural model indicates that vocational identity and emotional health accounted for the indirect effect of treatment intensity, age at diagnosis, and physical health on career readiness.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Addressing career readiness may be important to improve employment outcomes for adult survivors of childhood cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pang JWY, Friedman DL, Whitton JA, Stovall M, Mertens AC, Robison LL, et al. Employment status among adult survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50(1):104–10. doi:10.1002/pbc.21226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirchhoff AC, Leisenring W, Krull KR, Ness KK, Friedman DL, Armstrong GT, et al. Unemployment among adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Med Care. 2010;48(11):1015–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stern M, Krivoy E, Foster RH, Bitsko M, Toren A, Ben‐Arush M. Psychosocial functioning and career decision‐making in Israeli adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55(4):708–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stern M, Norman SL, Zevon MA. Career development of adolescent cancer patients: a comparative analysis. J Couns Psychol. 1991;38(4):431–9. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Boer AGEM, Verbeek JHAM, van Dijk FJH. Adult survivors of childhood cancer and unemployment. Cancer. 2006;107(1):1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Boer AGEM, Taskila T, Ojajarvi A, van Dijk FJH, Verbeek JHAM. Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA. 2009;301(7):753–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ness KK, Gurney JG, Zeltzer LK, Leisenring W, Mulrooney DA, Nathan PC, et al. The impact of limitations in physical, executive, and emotional function on health-related quality of life among adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(1):128–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ness KK, Wall MM, Oakes JM, Robison LL, Gurney JG. Physical performance limitations and participation restrictions among cancer survivors: a population-based study. Ann Epidemiol. 2006;16(3):197–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Strauser D, Wagner S, Wong AWK, O’Sullivan D. Career readiness, developmental work personality and age of onset in young adult central nervous system survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(7):543–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gottfredson LS. Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription, compromise, and self-creation. In: Brown D, editor. Career Choice and Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 85–148.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Super DE. The psychology of careers: an introduction to vocational development. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vondracek FW, Lerner RM, Schulenberg JE. Career development: a life-span developmental approach. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Short PF, Vasey JJ, Tunceli K. Employment pathways in a large cohort of adult cancer survivors. Cancer. 2005;103(6):1292–301. doi:10.1002/cncr.20912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterson GW, Sampson Jr JP, Reardon RC. Career development and services: a cognitive approach. Pacific Grove: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sampson JP. Career counseling and services: a cognitive information processing approach. Belmont: Thomson/Brooks/Cole; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saunders DE, Peterson GW, Sampson Jr JP, Reardon RC. Relation of depression and dysfunctional career thinking to career indecision. J Vocat Behav. 2000;56(2):288–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Strauser D, Zanskas S, Lustig D. Career readiness and individuals with disabilities. Rehabil Res Edu Pol. 2011;25(3–4):173–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hudson MM, Ness KK, Nolan VG, Armstrong GT, Green DM, Morris EB, et al. Prospective medical assessment of adults surviving childhood cancer: study design, cohort characteristics, and feasibility of the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56:825–36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ojha RP, Oancea SC, Ness KK, Lanctot JQ, Srivastava DK, Robison LL, et al. Assessment of potential bias from non-participation in a dynamic clinical cohort of long-term childhood cancer survivors: results from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60(5):856–64. doi:10.1002/pbc.24348.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Landier W, Bhatia S, Eshelman DA, Forte KJ, Sweeney T, Hester AL, et al. Development of risk-based guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors: the Children’s Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines from the Children’s Oncology Group Late Effects Committee and Nursing Discipline. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(24):4979–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sampson JP. Career Thoughts Inventory: professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sampson JP, Peterson GW, Lenz JG, Reardon RC, Saunders DE. The design and use of a measure of dysfunctional career thoughts among adults, college students, and high school students: the Career Thoughts Inventory. J Career Assess. 1998;6(2):115–34. doi:10.1177/106907279800600201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Holland JL, Daiger DC, Power PG, Press CP. My vocational situation. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Derogatis LR. BSI-18: administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson, Inc.; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Recklitis CJ, Parsons SK, Shih MC, Mertens A, Robison LL, Zeltzer L. Factor structure of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 in adult survivors of childhood cancer: results from the childhood cancer survivor study. Psychol Assess. 2006;18(1):22–32. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reulen RC, Zeegers MP, Jenkinson C, Lancashire ER, Winter DL, Jenney ME, et al. The use of the SF-36 questionnaire in adult survivors of childhood cancer: evaluation of data quality, score reliability, and scaling assumptions. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4(10):77–88.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zeltzer LK, Lu Q, Leisenring W, Tsao JC, Recklitis C, Armstrong G, et al. Psychosocial outcomes and health-related quality of life in adult childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17(2):435–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zeltzer LK, Recklitis C, Buchbinder D, Zebrack B, Casillas J, Tsao JC, et al. Psychological status in childhood cancer survivors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(14):2396–404.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Winick N. Neurocognitive outcome in survivors of pediatric cancer. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23(1):27–33. doi:10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834255e9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Allen A. The cardiotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. Semin Oncol. 1992;19(5):529–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Launchbury AP, Habboubi N. Epirubicin and doxorubicin: a comparison of their characteristics, therapeutic activity and toxicity. Cancer Treat Rev. 1993;19(3):197–228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tolba KA, Deliargyris EN. Cardiotoxicity of cancer therapy. Cancer Investig. 1999;17(6):408–22. doi:10.3109/07357909909021433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hatcher L. A step-by step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary: SAS Institute Inc; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):411–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kirchhoff AC, Krull KR, Ness KK, Armstrong GT, Park ER, Stovall M, et al. Physical, mental, and neurocognitive status and employment outcomes in the childhood cancer survivor study cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers. 2011;20(9):1838–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Steiner JF, Cavender TA, Main DS, Bradley CJ. Assessing the impact of cancer on work outcomes. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1703–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Buizer AI, de Sonneville LM, van den Heuvel–Eibrink MM, Veerman AJ. Chemotherapy and attentional dysfunction in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: effect of treatment intensity. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005;45(3):281–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. van Dam FS, Boogerd W, Schagen SB, Muller MJ, Fortuyn MED, vd Wall E, et al. Impairment of cognitive function in women receiving adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer I. 1998;90(3):210–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. MacCallum RC, Roznowski M, Necowitz LB. Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. Psychol Bull. 1992;111(3):490–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bentler PM, Chou CP. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol Methods Res. 1987;16(1):78–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirchhoff AC, Krull KR, Ness KK, Park ER, Oeffinger KC, Hudson MM, et al. Occupational outcomes of adult childhood cancer survivors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer. 2011;117(13):3033–44.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Holland JL. Making vocational choices: a theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lustig DC, Strauser DR. Health benefits for vocational rehabilitation consumers: comparison of access rates with workers in the general population. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2010;53(2):87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Blustein DL. The role of work in psychological health and well-being. Am Psychol. 2008;63(4):228–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sampson Jr J, Peterson G, Lenz J, Reardon R, Saunders D. Improving your career thoughts: a workbook for the Career Thoughts Inventory. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Cancer Center Support (CORE) grant CA 21765 from the National Cancer Institute and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).

Conflict of interest

All of the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Strauser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strauser, D., Klosky, J.L., Brinkman, T.M. et al. Career readiness in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J Cancer Surviv 9, 20–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0380-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0380-4

Keywords

Navigation