Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eccentric universal joints for parallel kinematic machine tools: variants and kinematic transformations

  • Machine Tool
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the 1990’s enhanced capabilities of parallel kinematic machine tools (PKM) regarding stiffness, motion accuracy and dynamics have been announced generously. Extensive research and development has been done in this area to date. Regarding this, the application range of PKMs is still small. Looking for reasons often yields inadequate motion accuracy as well as insufficient workspace. In either case the passive joints of the kinematic chains pose essential weak points. This article is about eccentric universal joints as an alternative approach that can avoid drawbacks of conventional universal joints and finally enhance the application range of PKMs. However, one of the consequences is a more complex and no longer unique kinematic transformation. This is significant in a control context, where iterative calculations should be avoided when possible due to real-time demands and the uniqueness of the solution has to be guaranteed in any case. Though the general inverse kinematic problem of industrial robots is identical, no generic closed-form (non-iterative) solution is known so far. But often closed-form as well as unique solutions are possible yet by considering particular features of the kinematic chain. In this paper after an introduction types of joint eccentricity are discussed and corresponding inverse kinematic transformations are derived with control purposes in mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neugebauer R (ed) (2004) Parallel kinematic machines in research and practice. Proc 4th Chemnitz Parallel Kinematics Seminar PKS 2004, April 20–21, 2004, Reports from the IWU vol. 24, Verlag Wissenschaftliche Scripten, Zwickau

  2. Neugebauer R (ed) (2006) Parallel kinematic machines in research and practice. Proc. 5th Chemnitz Parallel Kinematics Seminar PKS 2006, April 25–26, 2006, Reports from the IWU vol. 33, Verlag Wissenschaftliche Scripten, Zwickau

  3. Heisel U, Weule H Hrsg (2008) Fertigungsmaschinen mit Parallelkinematiken—Forschung in Deutschland. Shaker Verlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tran TL (2000) Allgemeine Transformation für Maschinen mit Parallelkinematiken. PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart

  5. Schaeffler Technologies GmbH & Co. KG (Edt) (2004) Komponenten für parallele Kinematiken. Marktinformation MAI66

  6. Otremba R (2004) Systematische Entwicklung von Gelenken für Parallelroboter. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Braunschweig

  7. Fedotov S (2005) Untersuchung von Parallelmechanismen hinsichtlich deren Eignung als Geräteschnittstelle von Traktoren. PhD thesis, TU Dresden

  8. Rudik R (2006) Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der Steuerung eines neuartigen Traktorhubwerkes auf der Basis der Hexapod-Mechanismen. PhD thesis, TU Dresden

  9. Großmann K, Kauschinger B, Riedel M (2012) Exzentrische Gelenke für parallelkinematische Werkzeugmaschinen. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb ZwF 107(1-2):25–32

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kauschinger B (2006) Verbesserung der Bewegungsgenauigkeit an einem Hexapod einfacher Bauart. PhD thesis, TU Dresden

  11. Li H (1990) Ein Verfahren zur vollständigen Lösung der Rückwärtstransformation für Industrieroboter mit allgemeiner Geometrie. PhD thesis, Universität Duisburg

  12. Eppinger M, Kreuzer E (1989) Systematischer Vergleich von Verfahren zur Rückwärtstransformation bei Industrierobotern. Robotersysteme 5:S.219–S.228

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masory O, Wang J, Zhuang H (1996) Kinematic modeling and calibration of a Steward platform. Int J Adv Robot 11(5):519–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daney D (2003) Kinematic calibration of the Gough Platform. Robotica 21:677–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Legnani G, Tosi D, Adamini R, Fassi I (2006) Calibration of parallel kinematic machines: theory and applications. In: Low KH (eds) Industrial robotics: programming, simulation and application, ARS Publication Co., Germany

    Google Scholar 

  16. Großmann K, Möbius V (2000) Hexapod für Handling. Zwischen Roboter und Werkzeugmaschine. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb ZwF 95(6):290–293

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We’ld like to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for their kind support within the project ”Fundamentals for the application of eccentric joints in parallel kinematic machine tools” (GR 1458-34/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Machine Tools and Control Technology, Helmholtzstraße 7a, 01069, Dresden, Germany

    Knut Großmann & Bernd Kauschinger

Authors
  1. Knut Großmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernd Kauschinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Kauschinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Großmann, K., Kauschinger, B. Eccentric universal joints for parallel kinematic machine tools: variants and kinematic transformations. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 6, 521–529 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-012-0405-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-012-0405-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation