Abstract
Wound healing is a complex reparative process not restricted to humans. This unique process is observed in each wounded living organism which re-sets its own developed healing programs. The gross appearance of the healed wounds vary, but the underlying mechanisms pass through a unified single common path known as “response to stress”. Stressors are internal or external factors with devastative influence on a tissue which lead to cell damage and consequently give rise to a series of efficient spatial and temporal defensive events to neutralize them. Response to stressors comprises changes in cell cycle and division, cell membranes, cell wall architecture and metabolism. In plants wound healing process is through based on the response to stress. The same events are observed in human wound responses. Knowledge about the similarities and dissimilarities in the healing process between various organisms help us provide therapeutic strategies based on the clarified weak and strong points. Thus, in this article the similar wound responses in plants and human are described and compared.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelini R, Tisi A, Rea G, Chen MM, Botta M, Federico R, Cona A (2008) Involvement of polyamine oxidase in wound healing. Plant Physiol 146:162–177
Arimura G, Kost C, Boland W (2005) Herbivore-induced, indirect plant defences. Biochim Biophys Acta 1734:91–111
Berleth T, Sachs T (2001) Plant morphogenesis: long-distance coordination and local patterning. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:57–62
Brewin NJ (2004) Plant cell wall remodelling in the rhizobium–legume symbiosis. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:293–316
Butler W, Cook L, Vayda ME (1990) Hypoxic stress inhibits multiple aspects of the potato tuber wound response. Plant Physiol 93:264–270
Chazen O, Neumann PM (1994) Hydraulic signals from the roots and rapid cell-wall hardening in growing maize (Zea mays L.) leaves are primary responses to polyethylene glycol-induced water deficits. Plant Physiol 104:1385–1392
Coulter J, Cowles H, Barnes C (1910) Text book of botany. American Book Company
Cutler SR, Somerville CR (2005) Imaging plant cell death: GFP-Nit1 aggregation marks an early step of wound and herbicide induced cell death. BMC Plant Biol 5:4
de Bruxelles GL, Roberts MR (2001) Signals regulating multiple responses to wounding and herbivores. Crit Rev Plant Sci 20:487–521
Domingues JS, de Souza TF, Soares AM, Jacinto T, Machado OL (2007) Activation of phospholipase PLA2 actvity in Ricinus communis leaves in response to mechanical wounding. Braz. J. Plant Physiol 1. doi:10.1590/S1677-04202007000100004
Dong X (2004) Pathogen-induced systemic DNA rearrangement in plants. Trends Plant Sci 9:60–61
Galindo FG, Sjöholm I, Rasmusson AG, Widell S, Kaack K (2007) Plant stress physiology: opportunities and challenges for the food industry. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 47:749–763
Green TR, Ryan CA (1972) Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defense mechanism against insects. Science 175:776–777
Heil M, Bostock RM (2002) Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the context of induced plant defences. Ann Bot 89:503–512
Ibraheem O, Hove RM, Bradley G (2008) Sucrose assimilation and the role of sucrose transporters in plant wound response. Afr J Biotech 7:4850–4855
Jander G, Howe G (2008) Plant interactions with arthropod herbivores: state of the field. Plant Physiol 146:801–803
Khokon MA, Okuma E, Hossain MA, Munemasa S, Uraji M, Nakamura Y, Mori IC, Murata Y (2010) Involvement of extracellular oxidative burst in salicylic acid-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ 34:434–443
Kutsukake M, Shibao H, Uematsu K, Fukatsu T (2009) Scab formation and wound healing of plant tissue by soldier aphid. Proc Biol Sci 276:1555–1563
Lebrun-Garcia A, Bourque S, Binet MN, Ouaked F, Wendehenne D, Chiltz A, Schäffner A, Pugin A (1999) Involvement of plasma membrane proteins in plant defense responses. Analysis of the cryptogein signal transduction in tobacco. Biochimie 81:663–668
Lincoln Taiz, Eduardo Zeiger (2010) Secondary metabolites and plant defense. Plant physiology, 5th edn. Sinauer publishers
Lulai E, Huckle L, Neubauer J, Suttle J (2011) Coordinate expression of AOS genes and JA accumulation: JA is not required for initiation of closing layer in wound healing tubers. J Plant Physiol4 (Epub ahead of print)
Murphy G, Nagase H (2011) Localizing matrix metalloproteinase activities in the pericellular environment. FEBS J 278:2–15
Offenbacher S, Elter JR, Lin D, Beck JD (2005) Evidence for periodontitis as a tertiary vascular infection. J Int Acad Periodontol 7:39–48
Picchioni GA, Watada AE (1998) Membrane structural lipid changes in fresh-cut organs: revisiting the wounding and aging phenomenon. Acta Hortic 464:237–242
Sabba RP, Lulai EC (2002) Histological analysis of the maturation of native and wound periderm in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber. Ann Bot 90:1–10
Schaller A, Frasson D (2001) Induction of wound response gene expression in tomato leaves by ionophores. Planta 212:431–435
Sharabi-Schwager M, Samach A, Porat R (2010) Overexpression of the CBF2 transcriptional activator in Arabidopsis suppresses the responsiveness of leaf tissue to the stress hormone ethylene. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 12:630–638
Vick BA (1993) Oxygenated fatty acids of the lipoxygenase pathway, pp 167–191
Yang SJ, Kitamura Y, Hosokawa M, Yazawa S (2006) Low temperature resistance enhanced by local wounding in Saintpaulia. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 75:476–480
Zhang Y, Turner JG (2008) Wound-induced endogenous jasmonates stunt plant growth by inhibiting mitosis. PLoS One 3:e3699
Zhou L, Thornburg R (1999) Wound-inducible genes in plants. In: Reynolds PHS (ed) Inducible gene expression. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 127–156
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. K. Kononowicz.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Behjati, M. Mammalian wound healing, an evolutionary process linked to plant’s response to stress: another proof toward unified healing mechanisms. Acta Physiol Plant 34, 1565–1570 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0922-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0922-6