Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of the seismic behavior of grouted sandy gravel foundations using shaking table tests

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sandy gravel foundations exhibit non-linear dynamic behavior when subjected to strong ground motions, which can have amplification effects on superstructures and can reveal insufficient lateral resistance of foundations. Grouting methods can be used to improve the seismic performance of natural sandy gravel foundations. The strength and stiffness of grouted sandy gravel foundations are different from those of natural foundations, which have unknown earthquake resistance. Few studies have investigated the seismic behavior of sandy gravel foundations before and after grouting. In this study, two shaking table tests were performed to evaluate the effect of grouting reinforcement on seismic performance. The natural frequency, acceleration amplification effect, lateral displacement, and vertical settlement of the non-grouted and grouted sandy gravel foundations were measured and compared. Additionally, the dynamic stress-strain relationships of the two foundations were obtained by a linear inversion method to evaluate the seismic energy dissipation. The test results indicated that the acceleration amplification, lateral displacement amplitude, and vertical settlement of the grouted sandy gravel foundation were lower than that of the non-grouted foundation under low-intensity earthquakes. However, a contrasting result was observed under high-intensity earthquakes. This demonstrated that different grouting reinforcement strategies are required for different sandy gravel foundations. In addition, the dynamic stress-strain relationship of the two foundations exhibited two different energy dissipation mechanisms. The results provide insights relating to the development of foundations for relevant engineering sites and to the dynamic behavior of grouted foundations prior to investigating soil-structure interaction problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Youd T L, Harp E L, Keefer D K, Wilson R C. The Borah Peak, Idaho earthquake of October 28, 1983—Landslides. Earthquake Spectra, 1985, 2(1): 71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Upadhyay R. Earthquake-induced soft-sediment deformation in the lower Shyok river valley, northern Ladakh, India. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2003, 21(4): 413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lanzo G, Tallini M, Milana G, Di Capua G, Del Monaco F, Pagliaroli A, Peppoloni S. The Aterno valley strong-motion array: seismic characterization and determination of subsoil model. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 9(6): 1855–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sbarra P, De Rubeis V, Di Luzio E, Mancini M, Moscatelli M, Stigliano F, Tosi P, Vallone R. Macroseismic effects highlight site response in Rome and its geological signature. Natural Hazards, 2012, 62(2): 425–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X B, Zhang J S, Li Z Y. Shear behavior of a geogrid-reinforced coarse-grained soil based on large-scale triaxial tests. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2014, 42(4): 312–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavarretta I, Coop M, Osullivan C. The influence of particle characteristics on the behavior of coarse-grained soils. Geotechnique, 2010, 60(6): 413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhanya J S, Boominathan A, Banerjee S. Response of low-rise building with geotechnical seismic isolation system. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 136(3): 106187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu C, Cui J, Zhang Z, Liu H, Huang X, Zhang C. The role of TBM asymmetric tail-grouting on surface settlement in coarsegrained soils of urban area: Field tests and FEA modelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 111(1): 103857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mei Y, Zhang X Y, Nong X Z, Fu L Y. Experimental study of the comprehensive technology of grouting and suspension under an operating railway in the cobble stratum. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021, 30(1): 100612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar T G S, Abraham B M, Sridharan A, Jose B T. Bearing capacity improvement of loose sandy foundation soils through grouting. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2011, 1(3): 1026–1033

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu G Y, Wang B L. Study on the effect of jet grouting pile reinforcing soft soil subgrade. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 594–597: 1420–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho C E, Lim C H, Tan C G. Jet grouting applications for large-scale basement construction in soft clay. Innovations in Grouting and Soil Improvement. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Geo-Frontiers Congress. Texas: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005, 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen S L, Wang Z F, Ho C E. Current state of the art in jet grouting for stabilizing soft soil. Ground Improvement and Geosynthetics. In: Proceedings of the Geo-Shanghai 2014 International Conference. Shanghai: ASCE Press, 2014, 107–116

    Google Scholar 

  14. Akin M, Akkaya I, Akin M K, Ozvan A, Ak Y. Impact of jet-grouting pressure on the strength and deformation characteristics of sandy and clayey soils in the compression zone. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23(8): 3340–3352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Santhoshkumar T G, Abraham B M, Sridharan A, Jose B T. Role of bentonite in improving the efficiency of cement grouting in coarse sand. Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA, 2016, 47(3): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gallagher P M, Pamuk A, Abdoun T. Stabilization of liquefiable soils using colloidal silica grout. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2007, 19(1): 33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meite R, Wotherspoon L, Green R. Influence of extent of remedial ground densification on seismic site effects via 2-D site response analyses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 152(1): 107041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hasheminezhad A, Bahadori H. Seismic response of shallow foundations over liquefiable soils improved by deep soil mixing columns. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 110(1): 251–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Montoya-Noguera S, Lopez-Caballero F. Modeling added spatial variability due to soil improvement: Coupling FEM with binary random fields for seismic risk analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 104(1): 174–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gu L L, Wang Z, Zhu W X, Jang B, Ling X Z, Zhang F. Numerical analysis of earth embankments in liquefiable soil and ground improvement mitigation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 146(1): 106739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Towhata I. Developments of soil improvement technologies for mitigation of liquefaction risk. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Dordrecht: Springer Dordrecht, 2007, 355–383

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang X L, Chen Y M, Liu H L, Zhang Z, Ding X C. Performance evaluation of a MICP-treated calcareous sandy foundation using shake table tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 129(1): 105959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Banović I, Radnic J, Grgic N. Shake table study on the efficiency of seismic base isolation using natural stone pebbles. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 2018: 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang L, Ji Q Q, Zheng Y L, Yang C, Zhang D L. Design of a shaking table test box for a subway station structure in soft soil. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2007, 1(2): 194–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guoxing C, Su C, Xi Z, Xiuli D, Chengzhi Q I, Zhihua W. Shaking-table tests and numerical simulations on a subway structure in soft soil. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 76(1): 13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haiyang Z, Xu W, Yu M, Erlei Y, Su C, Bin R, Guoxing C. Seismic responses of a subway station and tunnel in a slightly inclined liquefiable ground through shaking table test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 116(1): 371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang Y, Gong W, Cheng Y P, Dai G, Zou Y, Liang F. Effect of soil-pile-structure interaction on seismic behaviour of nuclear power station via shaking table tests. Structures, 2021, 33(1): 2990–3001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goktepe F, Celebi E, Omid A J. Numerical and experimental study on scaled soil-structure model for small shaking table tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 119(1): 308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Deb Roy S, Pandey A, Saha R. Shake table study on seismic soil-pile foundation-structure interaction in soft clay. Structures, 2021, 29(1): 1229–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu C, Dou P, Du X, El Naggar M H, Miyajima M, Chen S. Seismic performance of pile group-structure system in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soil from large-scale shake table tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 138(1): 106299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. CNS JTG 3430-2020. Test methods of soils for highway engineering. Beijing: Chinese National Standard, 2020 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chen H J, Chen S, Chen S C, Zhang X M, Wang L H. Dynamic behavior of sawdust-mixed soil in shaking table test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 142(1): 106542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeghal M, Elgamal A W, Tang H T, Stepp J C. Lotung downhole array. II: Evaluation of soil nonlinear properties. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 121(4): 363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51878186 and 51738004), the Innovation Driven Development Science and Technology Project of Guangxi Province (No. AA18118055), and the Systematic Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Engineering Safety (No. 2019ZDK041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China

    Tiancheng Wang, Yu Liang, Xiaoyong Zhang & Zhihuan Ruan

  2. Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan, 316021, China

    Guoxiong Mei

Authors
  1. Tiancheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoyong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhihuan Ruan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guoxiong Mei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaoyong Zhang or Guoxiong Mei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, T., Liang, Y., Zhang, X. et al. Investigation of the seismic behavior of grouted sandy gravel foundations using shaking table tests. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 16, 1196–1211 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0865-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0865-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation