Skip to main content
Log in

LSSVM-based approach for refining soil failure criteria and calculating safety factor of slopes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The failure criteria of practical soil mass are very complex, and have significant influence on the safety factor of slope stability. The Coulomb strength criterion and the power-law failure criterion are classically simplified. Each one has limited applicability owing to the noticeable difference between calculated predictions and actual results in some cases. In the work reported here, an analysis method based on the least square support vector machine (LSSVM), a machine learning model, is purposefully provided to establish a complex nonlinear failure criterion via iteration computation based on strength test data of the soil, which is of more extensive applicability to many problems of slope stability. In particular, three evaluation indexes including coefficient of determination, mean absolute percentage error, and mean square error indicate that fitting precision of the machine learning-based failure criterion is better than those of the linear Coulomb criterion and nonlinear power-law criterion. Based on the proposed LSSVM approach to determine the failure criterion, the limit equilibrium method can be used to calculate the safety factor of three-dimensional slope stability. Analysis of results of the safety factor of two three-dimensional homogeneous slopes shows that the maximum relative errors between the proposed approach and the linear failure criterion-based method and the power-law failure criterion-based method are about 12% and 7%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collins I F, Gunn C I M, Pender M J, Yan W. Slope stability analyses for materials with a non-linear failure envelope. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1988, 12(5): 533–550

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kang F, Li J J. Artificial bee colony algorithm optimized support vector regression for system reliability analysis of slopes. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2016, 30(3): 04015040

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen W F, Scawthorn C R. Limit analysis and limit equilibrium solutions in soil mechanics. Soil and Foundation, 1970, 10(3): 13–49

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sun D A, Wang L, Li L. Stability of unsaturated soil slopes with cracks under steady-infiltration conditions. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2019, 19(6): 04019044

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang L, Sun D A, Yao Y, Tan Y. Seismic stability of 3D piled unsaturated earth slopes using kinematic limit analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 126: 105821

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lian J, Wu J. Surficial stability analysis of soil slope under seepage based on a novel failure mode. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(3): 712–726

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sheng K, Hong B N, Liu X, Shan H. Modified Bishop method for stability analysis of weakly sloped subgrade under centrifuge model test. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(3): 727–741

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matsui T, San K C. Finite element slope stability analysis by shear strength reduction technique. Soil and Foundation, 1992, 32(1): 59–70

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan W, Li J X, Li Z H, Wang W, Sun X Y. A strength reduction method based on the Generalized Hoek-Brown (GHB) criterion for rock slope stability analysis. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 117: 103240

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fellenius W. Calculation of the stability of earth dams. In: Transactions of The 2nd Congress on Large Dams, International Commission on Large Damsof The World Power Conference. 1936, 4: 445–462

  11. Bishop A W. The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of earth slopes. Geotechnique, 1955, 5(1): 7–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Janbu N. Slope Stability Computations. Hoboken: John Wiley, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morgenstern N R, Price V E. The analysis of the stability of general slip surfaces. Geotechnique, 1965, 15(1): 79–93

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spencer E. A method of analysis for stability of embankments using parallel inter-slice forces. Geotechnique, 1967, 17(1): 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bell J M. General slope stability analysis. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1968, 94(6): 1253–1270

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu D Y, Lee C F. Explicit limit equilibrium solution for slope stability. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2002, 26(15): 1573–1590

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng H, Tham L G. Improved Bell’s method for the stability analysis of slopes. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2009, 33(14): 1673–1689

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: A simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. A three-dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(29–30): 2777–2799

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(37–40): 2437–2455

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Ren H, Zhuang X, Cai Y, Rabczuk T. Dual-horizon peridynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016, 108(12): 1451–1476

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ren H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Dual-horizon peridynamics: A stable solution to varying horizons. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 318: 762–782

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Areias P, Msekh M A, Rabczuk T. Damage and fracture algorithm using the screened Poisson equation and local remeshing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 158: 116–143

    Google Scholar 

  24. Areias P, Reinoso J, Camanho P P, César de Sá J, Rabczuk T. Effective 2D and 3D crack propagation with local mesh refinement and the screened Poisson equation. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 189: 339–360

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hedayat A A, Ahmadi Afzadi E, Kalantaripour H, Morshedi E, Iranpour A. A new predictive model for the minimum strength requirement of steel moment frames using artificial neural network. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 116: 69–81

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rivera J I, Bonilla C A. Predicting soil aggregate stability using readily available soil properties and machine learning techniques. Catena, 2020, 187: 104408

    Google Scholar 

  27. Oommen T, Baise L G, Vogel R. Validation and application of empirical liquefaction models. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(12): 1618–1633

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bikmukhametov T, Jäschke J. Combining machine learning and process engineering physics towards enhanced accuracy and explainability of data-driven models. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2020, 138: 106834

    Google Scholar 

  29. Merghadi A, Yunus A P, Dou J, Whiteley J, ThaiPham B, Bui D T, Avtar R, Abderrahmane B. Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: A comparative overview of algorithm performance. Earth-Science Reviews, 2020, 207: 103225

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smiti A. When machine learning meets medical world: Current status and future challenges. Computer Science Review, 2020, 37: 100280

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheil B B, Suryasentana S K, Cheng W C. Assessment of anomaly detection methods applied to microtunneling. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2020, 146(9): 04020094

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang N, Shen S L, Zhou A, Jin Y F. Application of LSTM approach for modelling stress-strain behaviour of soil. Applied Soft Computing, 2021, 100: 106959

    Google Scholar 

  33. Samui P. Slope stability analysis: A support vector machine approach. Environmental Geology (Berlin), 2008, 56(2): 255–267

    Google Scholar 

  34. Garg A, Garg A, Tai K, Sreedeep S. An integrated SRM-multi-gene genetic programming approach for prediction of factor of safety of 3-D soil nailed slopes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2014, 30: 30–40

    Google Scholar 

  35. Koopialipoor M, Jahed Armaghani D, Hedayat A, Marto A, Gordan B. Applying various hybrid intelligent systems to evaluate and predict slope stability under static and dynamic conditions. Soft Computing, 2019, 23(14): 5913–5929

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ferentinou M, Fakir M. Integrating Rock Engineering Systems device and artificial neural networks to predict stability conditions in an open pit. Engineering Geology, 2018, 246: 293–309

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou J, Li E, Yang S, Wang M, Shi X, Yao S, Mitri H S. Slope stability prediction for circular mode failure using gradient boosting machine approach based on an updated database of case histories. Safety Science, 2019, 118: 505–518

    Google Scholar 

  38. Huang F M, Cao Z, Guo J, Jiang S H, Li S, Guo Z Z. Comparisons of heuristic, general statistical and machine learning models for landslide susceptibility prediction and mapping. Catena, 2020, 191: 104580

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Y K, Huang J S, Tang H M, Zeng C. Bayesian back analysis of landslides considering slip surface uncertainty. Landslides, 2020, 17(9): 2125–2136

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wei X, Zhang L L, Yang H Q, Zhang L M, Yao Y P. Machine learning for pore-water pressure time-series prediction: Application of recurrent neural networks. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12(1): 453–467

    Google Scholar 

  41. Safa M, Sari P A, Shariati M, Suhatril M, Trung N T, Wakil K, Khorami M. Development of neuro-fuzzy and neuro-bee predictive models for prediction of the safety factor of eco-protection slopes. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020, 550: 124046

    Google Scholar 

  42. Suykens J A K, Vandewalle J. Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Processing Letters, 1999, 9(3): 293–300

    Google Scholar 

  43. Suykens J A K, Gestel T V, Brabanter J D, Moor B D, Vandewalle J. Least Squares Support Vector Machines. Singapore: World Scientific, 2002

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Duncan J M. State of the art: Limit equilibrium and finite-element analysis of slopes. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 122(7): 577–596

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li S G. A reflection on the Mohr failure criterion. Mechanics of Materials, 2020, 148: 103442

    Google Scholar 

  46. Johnston I W. Strength of intact geomechanical materials. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(6): 730–749

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang X J, Chen W F. Stability analysis of slopes with general nonlinear failure criterion. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1987, 11(1): 33–50

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Drescher A, Christopoulos C. Limit analysis slope stability with nonlinear yield condition. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1988, 12(3): 341–345

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jiang J C, Baker R, Yamagami T. The effect of strength envelope nonlinearity on slope stability computations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(2): 308–325

    Google Scholar 

  50. Yang X L, Yin J H. Slope stability analysis with nonlinear failure criterion. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130(3): 267–273

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rafiai H, Jafari A, Mahmoudi A. Application of ANN-based failure criteria to rocks under polyaxial stress conditions. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 59: 42–49

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wu S, Zhang S, Guo C, Xiong L. A generalized nonlinear failure criterion for frictional materials. Acta Geotechnica, 2017, 12(6): 1353–1371

    Google Scholar 

  53. Xue X H, Xiao M. Deformation evaluation on surrounding rocks of underground caverns based on PSO-LSSVM. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 69: 171–181

    Google Scholar 

  54. Barzegar R, Ghasri M, Qi Z, Quilty J, Adamowski J. Using bootstrap ELM and LSSVM models to estimate river ice thickness in the mackenzie river basin in the northwest territories, Canada. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2019, 577: 123903

    Google Scholar 

  55. Adnan R M, Liang Z, Heddam S, Zounemat-Kermani M, Kisi O, Li B. Least square support vector machine and multivariate adaptive regression splines for streamflow prediction in mountainous basin using hydro-meteorological data as inputs. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2020, 586: 124371

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wei J, Chen H. Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models by twice K-fold cross validation. Economics Letters, 2020, 191: 109149

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Chandler R J. Lias clay: The long-term stability of cutting slopes. Geotechnique, 1974, 24(1): 21–38

    Google Scholar 

  58. MATLAB. Version 9.4.0. Natick, MA: The Mathworks, Inc., 2018

  59. Perry J. A technique for defining non-linear shear strength envelopes, and their incorporation in a slope stability method of analysis. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 1994, 27(3): 231–241

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tordesillas A, Zhou Z Z, Batterham R. A data-driven complex systems approach to early prediction of landslides. Mechanics Research Communications, 2018, 92: 137–141

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zhou X P, Huang X C, Zhao X F. Optimization of the critical slip surface of three-dimensional slope by using an improved genetic algorithm. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(8): 04020120

    Google Scholar 

  62. Xiao S G, Guo W D, Zeng J X. Factor of safety of slope stability from deformation energy. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2018, 55(2): 296–302

    Google Scholar 

  63. Vapnik V N. Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1998

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Brabanter K D, Karsmakers P, Ojeda F, Alzate C, Brabanter J D, Pelckmans K, Moor B D, Vandewalle J, Suykens J A K. LS-SVMlab Toolbox User’s Guide. Heverlee: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51578466).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaohong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, S., Li, S. LSSVM-based approach for refining soil failure criteria and calculating safety factor of slopes. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 16, 871–881 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0863-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0863-8

Keywords

Navigation