Skip to main content
Log in

Vibration-based crack prediction on a beam model using hybrid butterfly optimization algorithm with artificial neural network

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vibration-based damage detection methods have become widely used because of their advantages over traditional methods. This paper presents a new approach to identify the crack depth in steel beam structures based on vibration analysis using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) combined with Butterfly Optimization Algorithm (BOA). ANN is quite successful in such identification issues, but it has some limitations, such as reduction of error after system training is complete, which means the output does not provide optimal results. This paper improves ANN training after introducing BOA as a hybrid model (BOA-ANN). Natural frequencies are used as input parameters and crack depth as output. The data are collected from improved FEM using simulation tools (ABAQUS) based on different crack depths and locations as the first stage. Next, data are collected from experimental analysis of cracked beams based on different crack depths and locations to test the reliability of the presented technique. The proposed approach, compared to other methods, can predict crack depth with improved accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Magagnini E, Khatir S. Effect of damage by notches in the vibration response of homogeneous and heterogeneous beam models. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 2021, 148: 187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Capozucca R, Magagnini E. Analysis of cracked RC beams under vibration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, 842(1): 012076

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar P, Siddiqui A, Ghadi A, Tony D, Rhenius S, Rane S. Damage detection in beams using vibration analysis and artificial neural network. In: 2021 4th Biennial International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE). Chengdu: IEEE, 2021, 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seguini M, Khatir S, Boutchicha D, Nedjar D, Wahab M A. Crack prediction in pipeline using ANN-PSO based on numerical and experimental modal analysis. Smart Structures and Systems, 2021, 27: 507–523

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khatir S, Boutchicha D, Le Thanh C, Tran-Ngoc H, Nguyen T N, Abdel-Wahab M. Improved ANN technique combined with Jaya algorithm for crack identification in plates using XIGA and experimental analysis. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 107: 102554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nourani B, Salmasi F, Ghorbani M A. Modeling and estimating the uplift force of gravity dams using finite element and artificial neural network whale optimization algorithm methods. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 52(7): 393–396

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mehrjoo M, Khaji N, Moharrami H, Bahreininejad A. Damage detection of truss bridge joints using artificial neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 2008, 35(3): 1122–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeung W T, Smith J W. Damage detection in bridges using neural networks for pattern recognition of vibration signatures. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27(5): 685–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khatir S, Wahab M A, Tiachacht S, Le Thanh C, Capozucca R, Magagnini E, Benaissa B. Damage identification in steel plate using FRF and inverse analysis. Fracture and Structural Integrity, 2021, 15(58): 416–433

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maity D, Saha A. Damage assessment in structure from changes in static parameter using neural networks. Sadhana, 2004, 29(3): 315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cunha E, Caetano E. Experimental modal analysis of civil engineering structures. Sound and Vibration, 2006, 40: 12–20

    Google Scholar 

  12. Padil K H, Bakhary N, Muyideen A, Li J, Hao H. Non-probabilistic method to consider uncertainties in frequency response function for vibration-based damage detection using artificial neural network. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 467: 115069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khiem N T, Lien T V. Multi-crack detection for beam by the natural frequencies. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, 273(1–2): 175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee J J, Lee J W, Yi J H, Yun C B, Jung H Y. Neural networks-based damage detection for bridges considering errors in baseline finite element models. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2005, 280(3–5): 555–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Samaniego E, Anitescu C, Goswami S, Nguyen-Thanh V M, Guo H, Hamdia K, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362: 112790

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhuang X, Guo H, Alajlan N, Zhu H, Rabczuk T. Deep autoencoder based energy method for the bending, vibration, and buckling analysis of Kirchhoff plates with transfer learning. European Journal of Mechanics. A, Solids, 2021, 87: 104225

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. 2021, arXiv:2102.02617

  19. Nguyen-Thanh V M, Anitescu C, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T, Zhuang X. Parametric deep energy approach for elasticity accounting for strain gradient effects. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 386: 114096

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Nanthakumar S S, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Zi G, Rabczuk T. Detection of material interfaces using a regularized level set method in piezoelectric structures. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 2016, 24(1): 153–176

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Arora S, Singh S. Butterfly optimization algorithm: A novel approach for global optimization. Soft Computing, 2019, 23(3): 715–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arora S, Singh S. An improved butterfly optimization algorithm with chaos. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2017, 32(1): 1079–1088

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Arora S, Singh S. An effective hybrid butterfly optimization algorithm with artificial bee colony for numerical optimization. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 4(4): 14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Faravelli L, Materazzi F, Rarina M. Genetic algorithms for structural identification. Proceedings of ICOSSAR, 2005, 5: 3115–3121

    Google Scholar 

  25. Casciati S. Stiffness identification and damage localization via differential evolution algorithms. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2008, 15(3): 436–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khatir A, Tehami M, Khatir S, Abdel Wahab M. Multiple damage detection and localization in beam-like and complex structures using co-ordinate modal assurance criterion combined with firefly and genetic algorithms. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2016, 18(8): 5063–5073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Samir K, Idir B, Serra R, Brahim B, Aicha A. Genetic algorithm based objective functions comparative study for damage detection and localization in beam structures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2015, 628(1): 012035

    Google Scholar 

  28. Horibe T, Watanabe K. Crack identification of plates using genetic algorithm. JSME International Journal Series A Solid Mechanics and Material Engineering, 2006, 49(3): 403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lai X, Zhang M. An efficient ensemble of GA and PSO for real function optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2009 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology. Beijing: IEEE, 2009, 651–655

    Google Scholar 

  30. Khatir A, Tehami M, Khatir S, Wahab M A. Damage detection and localization on thin plates using vibration analysis. Research in Veterinary Science, 2016, 106: 107–111

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zenzen R, Belaidi I, Khatir S, Wahab M A. A damage identification technique for beam-like and truss structures based on FRF and Bat Algorithm. Mecanical Reports, 2018, 346(12): 1253–1266

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ghannadi P, Kourehli S S. Structural damage detection based on MAC flexibility and frequency using moth-flame algorithm. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2019, 70(6): 649–659

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moezi S A, Zakeri E, Zare A, Nedaei M. On the application of modified cuckoo optimization algorithm to the crack detection problem of cantilever Euler-Bernoulli beam. Computers & Structures, 2015, 157: 42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim J T, Stubbs N. Crack detection in beam type structures using frequency data. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 259(1): 145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang M, Cheng S, Zhang H, Gul M, Lu H. Structural damage identification under temperature variations based on PSO-CS hybrid algorithm. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2019, 19(11): 1950139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Baghmisheh M V, Peimani M, Sadeghi M H, Ettefagh M M, Tabrizi A F. A hybrid particle swarm-Nelder-Mead optimization method for crack detection in cantilever beams. Applied Soft Computing, 2012, 12(8): 2217–2226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vakil-Baghmisheh M T, Peimani M, Sadeghi M H, Ettefagh M M. Crack detection in beam-like structures using genetic algorithms. Applied Soft Computing, 2008, 8(2): 1150–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dehuri S, Cho S B. A hybrid genetic based functional link artificial neural network with a statistical comparison of classifiers over multiple datasets. Neural Computing & Applications, 2010, 19(2): 317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Awan S M, Aslam M, Khan Z A, Saeed H. An efficient model based on artificial bee colony optimization algorithm with Neural Networks for electric load forecasting. Neural Computing & Applications, 2014, 25(7–8): 1967–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mirjalili S Z, Saremi S, Mirjalili S M. Designing evolutionary feedforward neural networks using social spider optimization algorithm. Neural Computing & Applications, 2015, 26(8): 1919–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen J F, Do Q H, Hsieh H N. Training artificial neural networks by a hybrid PSO-CS algorithm. Algorithms, 2015, 8(2): 292–308

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Rukhaiyar S, Alam M N, Samadhiya N K. A PSO-ANN hybrid model for predicting factor of safety of slope. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 12(6): 556–566

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shahrouzi M, Sabzi A H. Damage detection of truss structures by hybrid immune system and teaching-learning-based optimization. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 19(7): 811–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tran-Ngoc H, He L, Reynders E, Khatir S, Le-Xuan T, De Roeck G, Bui-Tien T, Wahab M A. An efficient approach to model updating for a multispan railway bridge using orthogonal diagonalization combined with improved particle swarm optimization. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 476: 115315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chatterjee S, Sarkar S, Hore S, Dey N, Ashour A S, Balas V E. Particle swarm optimization trained neural network for structural failure prediction of multistoried RC buildings. Neural Computing & Applications, 2017, 28(8): 2005–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ahmad F, Mat-Isa N A, Hussain Z, Boudville R, Osman M K. Genetic Algorithm-Artificial Neural Network (GA-ANN) hybrid intelligence for cancer diagnosis. In: 2010 2nd International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks. Liverpool: IEEE, 2010, 78–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Yaghini M, Khoshraftar M M, Fallahi M. A hybrid algorithm for artificial neural network training. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2013, 26(1): 293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This experimental research was supported by research funds provided by Università Politecnica Delle Marche. The authors would like to express their gratitude to all the technicians and students who collaborated to develop the experimental research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samir Khatir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khatir, A., Capozucca, R., Khatir, S. et al. Vibration-based crack prediction on a beam model using hybrid butterfly optimization algorithm with artificial neural network. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 16, 976–989 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0840-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0840-2

Keywords

Navigation