Skip to main content
Log in

Performance-based and performance-driven architectural design and optimization

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is marching into the sustainable and low-carbon era, the performance of architecture has drawn more attention than ever. Simulation technology has made quantified analysis of architectural performance possible and, therefore, directly enables architects and engineers to incorporate performance analysis into the design work flow. It is argued that performance-based and performance-driven architectural designs differ in that the latter involves computer-aided optimization technique so that the performance can be used as the criteria to truly “drive” the design. The paper starts with a brief introduction of performance issues in architectural design, followed by a review of the evolution of performance-based architectural design. The concept of performance-driven architectural design is presented, and some design projects and research work are reviewed. The driving engine, i.e., optimization technique, and its application in architectural design is discussed. Challenges to making performance-driven design a common practice are explained, and a schematic of integrated performance-based/driven architectural design software is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 10th Edition. Springfield: Merriam-Webster Incorporated, 1997

  2. United States Green Building Council. LEED - New Construction and Major Renovation V2.2 Reference Guide, Washington D C, 2007

  3. The Ministry of Construction of China. Evaluation Standard for Green Building, GB/T 50378, Beijing, 2006 (in Chinese)

  4. Negroponte N. The Architecture Machine, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bijl A, Shawcross G. Housing site layout system. Computer Aided Design, 1975, 7(1): 2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoskins E. Computer aids in system building. Computer-Aided Design, New York: North-Holland Press, 1973, 127–140

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meager M. The application of computer aids to hospital building. Computer-Aided Design, New York: North-Holland Press, 1973, 424–453

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ìlal M. The quest for integrated design system: a brief survey of past and current efforts, METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 2007, (2): 149–158

  9. Baldwin R, Yates A, Howared N, Rao S. BREEAM 98 for offices: An environmental assessment method for office buildings. Garston: Building Research Establishment Ltd, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. US Department of Energy. Getting Started with EnergyPlus, 2009

  11. Crawley D, Lawrie L, Winkelmann F, Buhl W, Huang Y, Pedersen C, Strand R, Liesen R, Fisher D, Witte M, Glazer J. EnergyPlus: Creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 2001, 33(4), 319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fluent Inc. Fluent 6.3 User Guide, 2006

  13. Mentor Graphics. FloVENT - Optimizing Data Center Cooling by Simulation, 2000

  14. Pollock M, Roderick Y, McEwan D, Wheatley C. Building simulation as an assisting tool in designing an energy efficient building: A case study. Integrated Environmental Solutions Limited, White Paper, 2009

  15. Roberts A, Marsh A. ECOTECT: Environmental Prediction in Architectural Education. Wales: Cardiff University, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwitter C. Engineering complexity: performance-based design in use. Performative Architecture - Beyond Instrumentality, New York & London: Spon Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raman M. Sustainable design: An American perspective. Performative Architecture - Beyond Instrumentality, New York & London: Spon Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kolarevic B. Computing the performative. Performative Architecture - Beyond Instrumentality, New York & London: Spon Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  19. Malkawi A. Performance simulation: research and tools. Performative Architecture - Beyond Instrumentality, New York & London: Spon Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  20. Flager F, Welle B, Bansal P, Soremekun G, Haymaker J. Multidisciplinary process integration and design optimization of a classroom building. CIFE Technical Report #TR175, 2008

  21. Wang W, Rivard H, Zmeureanu R. Floor shape optimization for green building design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2006, 20(4): 363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Flager F, Welle B, Bansal P, Soremekun G, Haymaker J. Multidisciplinary process integration and design optimization of a classroom building. CIFE Technical Report #TR175, 2008

  23. Geyer P. Component-oriented decomposition for multidisciplinary design optimization in building design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2009, 23(1): 12–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kämpf J, Robinson D. Optimisation of building form for solar energy utilization using constrained evolutionary algorithms. Energy and Buildings, 2010, 42(6), 807–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marks W. Multicriteria optimsation of shape of energy-saving buildings. Building and Environment, 1997, 32(4): 331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jedrzejuk H, Marks W. Optimization of shape and functional structure of buildings as well as heat source utilization - basic theory. Building and Environment, 2002, 37(12): 1379–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jedrzejuk H, Marks W. Optimization of shape and functional structure of buildings as well as heat source utilization - partial problems solution. Building and Environment, 2002, 37(11): 1037–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jedrzejuk H, Marks W. Optimization of shape and functional structure of buildings as well as heat source utilization - example. Building and Environment, 2002, 37(12): 1249–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Luebkeman C, Shea K. CDO: Computational design + optimization in building practice. The Arup Journal, 2005, 3: 17–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xing Shi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, X. Performance-based and performance-driven architectural design and optimization. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 4, 512–518 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-010-0090-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-010-0090-6

Keywords

Navigation