Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accounting greenhouse gas emissions of food consumption between urban and rural residents in China: a whole production perspective

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Food consumption is necessary for human survival. On a global scale, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission related to food consumption accounts for 19%–29% of the total GHG emission. China has the largest population in the world, which is experiencing a rapid development. Under the background of urbanization and the adjustment of the diet structure of Chinese residents, it is critical to mitigate the overall GHG emission caused by food consumption. This study aims to employ a singleregion input-output (SRIO) model and a multi-regional input-output (MRIO) model to measure GHG emission generated from food consumption in China and compare the contributions of different industrial sectors, uncovering the differences between urban and rural residents and among different provinces (autonomous regions/municipalities), as well as identifying the driving forces of GHG emission from food consumption at a national level. The results indicate that the total GHG emission generated from food consumption in China tripled from 157 Mt CO2e in 2002 to 452 Mt CO2e in 2017. The fastest growing GHG emission is from the consumption of other processed food and meat products. Although GHG emissions from both urban and rural residents increased, the gap between them is increasing. Agriculture, processing and manufacture of food, manufacture of chemical and transportation, storage and post services sectors are key sectors inducing food consumption related GHG emissions. From a regional perspective, the top five emission provinces (autonomous regions/municipalities) include Shandong, Hubei, Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu. Based on such results, policy recommendations are proposed to mitigate the overall GHG emission from food consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jiang H, Geng Y, Tian X, et al. Uncovering CO2 emission drivers under regional industrial transfer in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt: a multi-layer LMDI decomposition analysis. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, online, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0706-z

  2. Song X, Geng Y, Li K, et al. Does environmental infrastructure investment contribute to emissions reduction? A case of China. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, 14(1): 57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mi Z, Zhang Y, Guan D, et al. Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities. Applied Energy, 2016, 184: 1073–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang X, Geng Y, Shao S, et al. How to achieve China’s CO2 emission reduction targets by provincial efforts? An analysis based on generalized Divisia index and dynamic scenario simulation. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 127: 109892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li A, Lin B. Comparing climate policies to reduce carbon emissions in China. Energy Policy, 2013, 60: 667–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao Q, Kang W, Xu S, et al. Estimation and decomposition analysis of carbon emissions from the entire production cycle for Chinese household consumption. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 247: 525–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Y J, Bian X J, Tan W, et al. The indirect energy consumption and CO2 emission caused by household consumption in China: an analysis based on the input-output method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 163: 69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu S, Lei Y, Li S. CO2 emissions from household consumption at the provincial level and interprovincial transfer in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 210: 93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tian X, Geng Y, Dong H, et al. Regional household carbon footprint in China: a case of Liaoning province. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 114: 401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tian X, Geng Y, Dai H C, et al. The effects of household consumption pattern on regional development: a case study of Shanghai. Energy, 2016, 103: 49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang X, Chen S. Urban-rural carbon footprint disparity across China from essential household expenditure: survey-based analysis, 2010–2014. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 267: 110570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vermeulen S J, Campbell B M, Ingram J S I. Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2012, 37(1): 195–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu Z, Sun D W, Zeng X A, et al. Research developments in methods to reduce the carbon footprint of the food system: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2015, 55(9): 1270–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu Y, Wang X, Lu F. The carbon footprint of food consumption in Beijing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(5): 1570–1577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao Z, Hao J, Xing H. Spatial-temporal change of Chinese resident food consumption carbon emissions and its driving mechanism. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(1): 91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhi J, Gao J. Analysis of carbon emission caused by food consumption in urban and rural inhabitants in China. Progress in Geography, 2009, 3: 429–434

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yue Q, Xu X, Hillier J, et al. Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture: from farm production to food consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 149: 1011–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin B, Xie X. CO2 emissions of China’s food industry: an input-output approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 1410–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kucukvar M, Samadi H. Linking national food production to global supply chain impacts for the energy-climate challenge: the cases of the EU-27 and Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 108: 395–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng W, Cai B, Zhang B. A bite of China: food consumption and carbon emission from 1992 to 2007. China Economic Review, 2020, 59: 100949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Song F, Reardon T, Tian X, et al. The energy implication of China’s food system transformation. Applied Energy, 2019, 240: 617–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Su B, Ang B W. Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: some methodological developments. Energy Economics, 2012, 34(1): 177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang X, Huang H, Hong J, et al. A spatiotemporal investigation of energy-driven factors in China: a region-based structural decomposition analysis. Energy, 2020, 207: 118249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu M, Zhao X, Gao Y. Factor decomposition of China’s industrial electricity consumption using structural decomposition analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2019, 51: 67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dietzenbacher E, Kulionis V, Capurro F. Measuring the effects of energy transition: a structural decomposition analysis of the change in renewable energy use between 2000 and 2014. Applied Energy, 2020, 258: 114040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Y. Impact of urban and rural household consumption on carbon emissions in China. Economic Systems Research, 2013, 25(3): 287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Su B, Ang B W. Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities. Energy Economics, 2017, 65: 137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y J, Bian X J, Tan W, et al. The indirect energy consumption and CO2 emission caused by household consumption in China: an analysis based on the input—output method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 163: 69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu G X, Wang X Q, Wu H J, et al. Analysis of energy consumption and carbon emission of urban residents in Anhui province. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology, 2020, 40: 7 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen C. Carbon footprint estimation on food consumption of residences in Lanzhou city. Dissertation for Master’s Degree. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ding L. Research on spatial differences of residents’ food consumption carbon emissions in Guangdong province. Dissertation for Master’s Degree. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  32. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of China. General Principles for Calculation of the Comprehensive Energy Consumption. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  33. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of China. Guidelines for the preparation of provincial GHG inventories. Beijing, China, 2010 (in Chinese)

  34. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2006

  35. Gao Z, Geng Y, Wu R, et al. China’s CO2 emissions embodied in fixed capital formation and its spatial distribution. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2020, 27(16): 19970–19990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Peters G P, Hertwich E G. Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian case. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(4): 379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Miller R E, Blair P D. Input-output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. United Nations. Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. Studies in Methods, Series F, No 61, New York, 1993, avabilable at the website of unstats.un.org

  39. Su B, Ang B W. Input—output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: competitive versus non-competitive imports. Energy Policy, 2013, 56: 83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weber C L, Peters G P, Guan D, et al. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(9): 3572–3577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang B, Qiao H, Chen Z M, et al. Growth in embodied energy transfers via China’s domestic trade: evidence from multi-regional input-output analysis. Applied Energy, 2016, 184: 1093–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mi Z, Meng J, Guan D, et al. Chinese CO2 emission flows have reversed since the global financial crisis. Nature Communications, 2017, 8(1): 1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Guan D, Peters G P, Weber C L, et al. Journey to world top emitter: an analysis of the driving forces of China’s recent CO2 emissions surge. Geophysical Research Letters, 2009, 36(4): L04709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shuang S, Xiu F F. Evolution of final demand pattern, changes in industrial structure and CO2 emission in China—based on input-output model and SDA method. Journal of Shanxi Finance and Economics University, 2013, 35: 11 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  45. National Bureau of Statistics of China. Input-Output Table of China 2002, 2007, 2012, 2017. 2017, available at the website of stats.gov.cn

  46. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Energy Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press (in Chinese)

  47. Fan Z. Study on the impact of family population on residents’ consumption carbon emissions—analysis of CFPs data. Dissertation for Master’s Degree. Kaifeng: Henan University, 2019

    Google Scholar 

  48. Liu W, Tang Z, Han M. The 2012 China Multi-Regional Input-Output Table of 31 Provincial Units. Beijing: China Statistics Press

  49. National Bureau of Statistics of China. Industrial classification for national economic activities, 2011, available at the website of stats.gov.cn

  50. Zhuang M, Geng Y, Pan H, et al. Ecological and socioeconomic impacts of payments for ecosystem services—a Chinese garlic farm case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 285: 124866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Qian H. The structural decomposition of income gap sources between urban and rural residents in China. Statistics & Decisions, 2020, 36(20): 76–79

    Google Scholar 

  52. Geng Y, Fujita T, Chiu A, et al. Responding to the Paris Climate Agreement: global climate change mitigation efforts. Frontiers in Energy, 2018, 12(3): 333–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Deng W F. Overview of China’s fertilizer industry in 2019. 2020, available at the website of leadleo.com

  54. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China. Action Plan for Zero Growth in Fertilizer Use by 2020. 2015, available at the website of moa.gov.cn

  55. Su B, Huang H C, Ang B W, et al. Input—output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: the effects of sector aggregation. Energy Economics, 2010, 32(1): 166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Su B, Ang B W. Multi-region input—output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: the feedback effects. Ecological Economics, 2011, 71: 42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kim B, Neff R. Measurement and communication of greenhouse gas emissions from US food consumption via carbon calculators. Ecological Economics, 2009, 69(1): 186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Albert O, Marianne T, Jonathan L, et al. Tracking the carbon emissions of Denmark’s five regions from a producer and consumer perspective. Ecological Economics, 2020, 177: 106778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Yang X, Jia X. Low-carbon economy and low-carbon food. Energy Procedia, 2011, 5: 1099–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Xian J, Bian J. China launches clean plate campaign 2.0 as Xi calls for end to food wastage. 2020, available at the website of People’s Daily (in Chinese)

  61. Zhang W F, Dou Z X, He P, et al. New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(21): 8375–8380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zentner R P, Lafond G P, Derksen D A, et al. Effects of tillage method and crop rotation on non-renewable energy use efficiency for a thin Black Chernozem in the Canadian Prairies. Soil & Tillage Research, 2004, 77(2): 125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Van Hauwermeiren A, Coene H, Engelen G, et al. Energy lifecycle inputs in food systems: a comparison of local versus mainstream cases. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2007, 9(1): 31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Davis J, Sonesson U, Baumgartner D U, et al. Environmental impact of four meals with different protein sources: case studies in Spain and Sweden. Food Research International, 2010, 43(7): 1874–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. González A D, Frostell B, Carlsson-Kanyama A. Protein efficiency per unit energy and per unit greenhouse gas emissions: potential contribution of diet choices to climate change mitigation. Food Policy, 2011, 36(5): 562–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Weber C L, Matthews H S. Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(10): 3508–3513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ding S. The potential of saving food. West China Development, 2013, 03: 52–54 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Liu Y Q. Do you have cleared your plate today? High School Years, 2013, 13: 4–5 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ding S. What is the potential of saving food? Qiushi, 2013, 05: 23–24 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71810107001, 72088101, and 7169024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Geng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Geng, Y., Gao, Z. et al. Accounting greenhouse gas emissions of food consumption between urban and rural residents in China: a whole production perspective. Front. Energy 16, 357–374 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0763-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0763-y

Keywords

Navigation