Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A one-way coupled atmospheric-hydrological modeling system with combination of high-resolution and ensemble precipitation forecasting

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coupled hydrological and atmospheric modeling is an effective tool for providing advanced flood forecasting. However, the uncertainties in precipitation forecasts are still considerable. To address uncertainties, a one-way coupled atmospheric-hydrological modeling system, with a combination of high-resolution and ensemble precipitation forecasting, has been developed. It consists of three high-resolution single models and four sets of ensemble forecasts from the THORPEX Interactive Grande Global Ensemble database. The former provides higher forecasting accuracy, while the latter provides the range of forecasts. The combined precipitation forecasting was then implemented to drive the Chinese National Flood Forecasting System in the 2007 and 2008 Huai River flood hindcast analysis. The encouraging results demonstrated that the system can clearly give a set of forecasting hydrographs for a flood event and has a promising relative stability in discharge peaks and timing for warning purposes. It not only gives a deterministic prediction, but also generates probability forecasts. Even though the signal was not persistent until four days before the peak discharge was observed in the 2007 flood event, the visualization based on threshold exceedance provided clear and concise essential warning information at an early stage. Forecasters could better prepare for the possibility of a flood at an early stage, and then issue an actual warning if the signal strengthened. This process may provide decision support for civil protection authorities. In future studies, different weather forecasts will be assigned various weight coefficients to represent the covariance of predictors and the extremes of distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bao H J, Zhao L N, He Y, Li Z J, Wetterhall F, Cloke H L, Pappenberger F, Manful D (2011). Coupling ensemble weather predictions based on TIGGE database with Grid-Xinanjiang model for flood forecast. Adv Geosci, 29: 61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholmes J, Thielen J, Ramos M, Gentilini S (2008). The European Flood Alert System EFAS–Part 2: statistical skill assessment of probabilistic and deterministic operational forecasts. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss, 5(1): 289–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit R, Desgagné M, Pellerin P, Pellerin S, Chartier Y, Desjardins S (1997). A semi-lagrangian, semi-implicit wide-band atmospheric model suited for fine scale process studies and simulation. Mon Weather Rev, 125(10): 2382–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit R, Schär C, Binder P, Chamberland S, Davies H C, Desgagné M, Girard C, Keil C, Kouwen N, Lüthi D, Maric D, Müller E, Pellerin P, Schmidli J, Schubiger F, Schwierz C, Sprenger M, Walser A, Willemse S, Yu W, Zala E (2001). The real-time ultrafine scale forecast support during the special observing period of the MAP. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 83(1): 985–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop C H, Etherton B J, Majumdar S J (2001). Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter Part I: theoretical aspects. Mon Weather Rev, 129(3): 420–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke W, Buizza R, Naughton M (2004). Performance of the ECMWF and the BoM ensemble prediction systems in the Southern Hemisphere. Mon Weather Rev, 132(10): 2338–2357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brankovic C, Palmer T N, Molteni F, Tibaldi S, Cubasch U (1990). Extended-range predictions with ECMWF models: time-lagged ensemble forecasting. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 116(494): 867–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buizza R, Palmer T N (1995). The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric global circulation. J Atmos Sci, 52(9): 1434–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté J, Gravel S, Méthot A, Patoine A, Roch M, Staniforth A (1998). The operational CMC-MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model Part I: design considerations and formulation. Mon Weather Rev, 126(6): 1373–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalcher A, Kalnay E, Hoffman R N (1988). Medium range lagged forecasts. Mon Weather Rev, 116(2): 402–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davolio S, MigliettaMM, Diomede T, Marsigli C, Montani A (2012). A flood episode in Northern Italy: multi-model and single-model mesoscale meteorological ensembles for hydrological predictions. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 9(12): 13415–13450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davolio S, Miglietta M M, Diomede T, Marsigli C, Morgillo A, Moscatello A (2008). A meteo-hydrological prediction system based on a multi-model approach for precipitation forecasting. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 8(1): 143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diomede T, Davolio S, Marsigli C, Miglietta M M, Moscatello A, Papetti P, Paccagnella T, Buzzi A, Malguzzi P (2008b). Discharge prediction based on multi-model precipitation forecasts. Meteorol Atmos Phys, 101(3–4): 245–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diomede T, Marsigli C, Nerozzi F, Papetti P, Paccagnella T (2008a). Coupling high-resolution precipitation forecasts and discharge predictions to evaluate the impact of spatial uncertainty in numerical weather prediction model outputs. Meteorol Atmos Phys, 102(1–2): 37–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erfani A, Méthot A, Goodson R, Bélair S, Yeh K S, Côté J, Moffet R (2003). Synoptic and mesoscale study of a severe convective outbreak with the nonhydrostatic Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model. Meteorol Atmos Phys, 82(1–4): 31–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froude L (2010). TIGGE: comparison of the prediction of northern hemisphere extratropical cyclones by different ensemble prediction systems. Weather Forecast, 25(3): 819–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill M A (1978). Flood routing by the Muskingum method. J Hydrol (Amst), 36(3–4): 353–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habets F, Noilhan J, Golaz C, Goutorbe J P, Lacarrère P, Leblois E, Ledoux E, Martin E, Ottlé C, Vidal-Madjar D (1999). The ISBA surface scheme in a macroscale hydrological model applied to the Hapex-Mobilhy area Part 1: model and database. J Hydrol (Amst), 217(1–2): 75–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Wetterhall F, Cloke H L, Pappenberger F, Wilson M, Freer J, Mc Gregor G (2009). Tracking the uncertainty in flood alerts driven by grand ensemble weather predictions. Meteorol Appl, 16(1): 91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzysztofowicz R (2001). The case for probabilistic forecasting in hydrology. J Hydrol (Amst), 249(1–4): 2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laprise R, Caya D, Bergeron G, Giguère M (1997). The formulation of the Andre Robert MC2 (Mesoscale Compressible Community) model. Atmos-ocean, 35(S1): 195–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zou Z L (2014). Impact of FY-3A MWTS radiances on prediction in GRAPES with comparison of two quality control schemes. Front Earth Sci, 8(2): 251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liguori S, Rico-Ramirez M A (2013). A practical approach to the assessment of probabilistic flow predictions. Hydrol Processes, 27 (1): 18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S Y, Gao W, Xu M, Wang X Y, Liang X Z (2009). China summer precipitation simulations using an optimal ensemble of cumulus schemes. Front Earth Sci, 3(2): 248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Duan Q, Zhao L, Ye A, Tao Y, Miao C, Mu X, Schaake J C (2013). Evaluating the predictive skill of post-processed NCEP GFS ensemble precipitation forecasts in China’s Huai River Basin. Hydrol Processes, 27(1): 57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo B K, Qian X W (1987). Some problems with Muskingum method. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 32(4): 485–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Qu A, Wang Y (2007). The performance of the new tropical cyclone track prediction system of the China National Meteorological Center. Meteorol Atmos Phys, 97(1–4): 29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z K, Fan Z W, Zhang M, Su Y L (2014). Flood risk control of dams and dykes in middle reach of Huaihe River. Water Science and Engineering, 7(1): 17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Noilhan J, Planton S (1989). A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models. Mon Weather Rev, 117(3): 536–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan X D, Li X, Shi X K, Han X J, Luo L H, Wang L X (2012). Dynamic downscaling of near-surface air temperature at the basin scale using WRF—A case study in the Heihe River Basin, China. Front Earth Sci, 6(3): 314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappenberger F, Bartholmes J, Thielen J, Cloke H L, Buizza R, de Roo A (2008). New dimensions in early flood warning across the globe using grand-ensemble weather predictions. Geophys Res Lett, 35 (10): L10404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappenberger F, Stephens E, Thielen J, Salamon P, Demeritt D, van Andel S J, Wetterhall F, Alfieri L (2013). Visualizing probabilistic flood forecast information: expert preferences and perceptions of best practice in uncertainty communication. Hydrol Processes, 27(1): 132–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappenberger F, Thielen J, Del MedicoM(2011). The impact of weather forecast improvements on large scale hydrology: analysing a decade of forecasts of the European Flood Alert System. Hydrol Processes, 25(7): 1091–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park Y Y, Buizza R, Leutbecher M (2008). TIGGE: preliminary results on comparing and combining ensembles. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 134 (637): 2029–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qaddouri A, Cote J, Valin M (2000). A parallel direct 3D elliptic solver. International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, 541: 429–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebber P J, Schultz D M, Colle B A, Stensrud D J (2004). Toward improved prediction: high-resolution and ensemble modeling systems in operation. Weather Forecast, 19(5): 936–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossa A, Liechti K, Zappa M, Bruen M, Germann U, Haase G, Keil C, Krahe P (2011). The COST 731 action: a review on uncertainty propagation in advanced hydro-meteorological forecast systems. Atmos Res, 100(2–3): 150–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si D, Ding Y H, Liu Y J (2009). Decadal northward shift of the Meiyu belt and the possible cause. Chin Sci Bull, 54(24): 4742–4748

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensrud D J, Brooks H E, Du J, Tracton M S, Rogers E (1999). Using ensembles for short-range forecasting. Mon Weather Rev, 127(4): 433–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanguay M, Robert A, Laprise R (1990). A semi-implicit semi- Lagrangian fully compressible regional forecast model. MonWeather Rev, 118(10): 1970–1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thielen J, Bartholmes J, Ramos M, de Roo A (2008). The European flood alert system–part 1: concept and development. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss, 5(1): 257–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S J, Girard C, Benoit R, Desgané M, Pellerin P (1998). A new adiabatic kernel for the MC2 model. Atmos-ocean, 36(3): 241–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todini E (2004). Role and treatment of uncertainty in real-time flood forecasting. Hydrol Processes, 18(14): 2743–2746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei M, Toth Z (2003). A new measure of ensemble performance: perturbation versus error correlation analysis (PECA). Mon Weather Rev, 131(8): 1549–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen L, Yu W, Lin C A, Béland M, Benoit R, Delage Y (2000). The role of land surface schemes in short-range, high spatial resolution forecast. Mon Weather Rev, 128(10): 3605–3617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xuan Y, Cluckie D, Wang Y (2009). Uncertainty analysis of hydrological ensemble forecasts in a distributed model utilising short-range rainfall prediction. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 13(3): 293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakimiw E, Robert A (1986). Accuracy and stability analysis of a fully implicit scheme for the shallow-water equations. Mon Weather Rev, 114(1): 240–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z B, Yang T, Schwartz F W (2014). Water issues and prospects for hydrological science in China. Water Science and Engineering, 7(1): 1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S L (2006). Interactive correct technology for flood forecasting. Shui Kexue Jinzhan, 17(5): 653–657 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y Y, Shao Q X, Xia J, Bunn S E, Zuo Q T (2011). Changes of flow regimes and precipitation in Huai River Basin in the last half century. Hydrol Processes, 25(2): 246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L N, Qi D, Tian F Y, Wu H, Di J Y, Wang Z, Li A H (2012). Probabilistic flood prediction in the upper Huaihe catchment using TIGGE data. Acta Meteorol Sin, 26(1): 62–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao R J (1992). The Xinanjiang model applied in China. J Hydrol (Amst), 135(1–4): 371–381

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China

    Zhiyong Wu, Juan Wu & Guihua Lu

  2. Bureau of Hydrology Information Center of Taihu Basin Authority, Shanghai, 200434, China

    Juan Wu

Authors
  1. Zhiyong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guihua Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Wu, J. & Lu, G. A one-way coupled atmospheric-hydrological modeling system with combination of high-resolution and ensemble precipitation forecasting. Front. Earth Sci. 10, 432–443 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-015-0535-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-015-0535-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation