Skip to main content
Log in

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in morbidly obese patients: a VCQI database study

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare perioperative outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with morbid obesity (body mass index (BMI > 40 kg/m2)) and non-obese patients. Using the Vattikuti Collective quality initiative (VCQI) database for RAPN, data for morbidly obese and non-obese patients was obtained. Propensity scores were calculated for two treatment groups (morbidly obese vs. non-obese) for the following variables i.e. age, sex, tumor size, RNS, surgical access (retroperitoneal/transperitoneal) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to ensure comparability. The primary outcome for the study was comparison of trifecta between the two groups. In this study, 158 morbidly obese patients were matched with 158 non-obese patients undergoing RAPN. Two groups matched well for age, sex, tumor size, eGFR and RNS. There was no difference between two groups for ischemia time, blood loss, blood transfusion, conversion to radical nephrectomy, length of stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Operative time was longer in morbidly obese patients (median 210 min vs. 120 min, p = 0.000). On pathological analysis, malignant tumors were more likely in the morbidly obese group (83.1% vs.73.4%, p = 0.018). Trifecta outcomes were comparable between the two groups (60.1% vs. 63.3%, p = 0.563). The Median duration of follow-up was 12 months (1–96 months). The morbidly obese group had significantly higher day one creatinine (1.25 ± 0.7 vs. 1.07 ± 0.37, p = 0.001) and significantly lower day one eGFR (62.1 ± 19 vs. 69.2 ± 21, p = 0.018). However, there was no difference between the two groups for the last follow-up creatinine and eGFR. RAPN in morbidly obese patients is associated with equivalent perioperative outcomes compared to non-obese patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Corresponding author had access to all the data and is available to genuine authors on request.

References

  1. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Bedke J, Bex A, Capitanio U, Giles RH et al (2021) Members of EAU guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma. https://uroweb.org/guideline/renal-cell-carcinoma/. Accessed 27 Feb 2022

  2. Isac WE, Autorino R, Hillyer SP, Hernandez AV, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2012) The impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 110:e997–e1002 (Epub 2012/10/31)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdullah N, Dalela D, Barod R, Larson J, Johnson M, Mass A et al (2015) Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours in obese patients: perioperative outcomes in a multi-institutional analysis. Can Urol Assoc J 9:E859–E862 (Epub 2016/01/21)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosen DC, Kannappan M, Kim Y, Paulucci DJ, Beksac AT, Abaza R et al (2019) The impact of obesity in patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 33:431–437 (Epub 2019/04/18)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamat AM, Shock RP, Naya Y, Rosser CJ, Slaton JW, Pisters LL (2004) Prognostic value of body mass index in patients undergoing nephrectomy for localized renal tumors. Urology 63:46–50 (Epub 2004/01/31)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haferkamp A, Pritsch M, Bedke J, Wagener N, Pfitzenmaier J, Buse S et al (2008) The influence of body mass index on the long-term survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma after tumour nephrectomy. BJU Int 101:1243–1246 (Epub 2008/02/12)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeon HG, Jeong IG, Lee JH, Lee CJ, Kwak C, Kim HH et al (2010) Prognostic value of body mass index in Korean patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 183:448–454 (Epub 2009/12/17)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sood A, Abdollah F, Sammon JD, Majumder K, Schmid M, Peabody JO et al (2015) The effect of body mass index on perioperative outcomes after major surgery: results from the national surgical quality improvement program (ACS-NSQIP) 2005–2011. World J Surg 39:2376–2385 (Epub 2015/06/11)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Romero FR, Rais-Bahrami S, Muntener M, Brito FA, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR (2008) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in obese and non-obese patients: comparison with open surgery. Urology 71:806–809 (Epub 2008/02/23)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Komninos C, Tuliao P, Koo KC, Chang CH, Han WK, Rha KH (2015) Obesity is not associated with increased operative complications in single-site robotic partial nephrectomy. Yonsei Med J 56:382–387 (Epub 2015/02/17)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Malki M, Oakley J, Hussain M, Barber N (2019) Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29:1027–1032 (Epub 2019/05/30)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arora S, Abaza R, Adshead JM, Ahlawat RK, Challacombe BJ, Dasgupta P et al (2018) “Trifecta” outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in solitary kidney: a Vattikuti Collective Quality Initiative (VCQI) database analysis. BJU Int 121:119–123 (Epub 2017/07/28)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arora S, Heulitt G, Menon M, Jeong W, Ahlawat RK, Capitanio U et al (2018) Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: comparison in a multi-institutional setting. Urology 120:131–137 (Epub 2018/07/28)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383 (Epub 1987/01/01)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182:844–853 (Epub 2009/07/21)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213 (Epub 2004/07/27)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Macleod LC, Hsi RS, Gore JL, Wright JL, Harper JD (2014) Perinephric fat thickness is an independent predictor of operative complexity during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 28:587–591 (Epub 2014/01/01)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ (2003) Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 348:1625–1638 (Epub 2003/04/25)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chow WH, Dong LM, Devesa SS (2010) Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol 7:245–257 (Epub 2010/05/08)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma G, Tyagi S, Mavuduru R, Bora GS, Sharma AP, Devana SK et al (2021) External validation of SPARE nephrometery score in predicting overall complications, trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Minerva Urol Nefrol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03972-7. (Epub 2021/01/14)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Furukawa J, Kanayama H, Azuma H, Inoue K, Kobayashi Y, Kashiwagi A et al (2020) “Trifecta” outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large Japanese multicenter study. Int J Clin Oncol 25:347–353 (Epub 2019/11/05)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Naeem N, Petros F, Sukumar S, Patel M, Bhandari A, Kaul S et al (2011) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in obese patients. J Endourol 25:101–105 (Epub 2011/01/06)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Vattikuti Foundation for providing data.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: GS, GPS Data acquisition: PD, BC, MB, RA, SR, NMB, SA, JRP, CR, AM, RA, KHR, DM, TBY, DJP, UC, KKM, FP, LT Data analysis: GS Drafting of the manuscript: GS, GPS Critical revision of the manuscript: PA, PD, BC, MB, RA, SR, NMB, SA, JRP, CR, AM, RA, KHR, DM, TBY, DJP, UC, KKM, FP, LT, GG. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gopal Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ronney Abaza is a speaker for Intuitive surgical, Conmed Inc and VTI. Benjamin J Challacombe, Kris K Maes, Rajesh Ahlawat and Gagan Gautam are proctors for Intuitive surgical. Other authors report no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, G., Singh, G., Ahluwalia, P. et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in morbidly obese patients: a VCQI database study. J Robotic Surg 17, 2141–2147 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01627-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01627-6

Keywords

Navigation