Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feasibility, safety and efficacy of argon beam coagulation in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for solid renal masses ≤ 7 cm in size

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most important steps of the partial nephrectomy (PN) is hemostatic control of tumor bed which also effects the warm ischemia time (WIT). Argon beam coagulation (ABC) for decades is a well-known method for surface controls during major open surgical sites. This study aimed to compare peri- and postoperative relevant parameters in patients with ABC or internal renorrhaphy (IR) during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). One hundred seventy patients with ≤ 7 cm tumors, who underwent RAPN at our institutions, were included in this retrospective study. Tumor bed was controlled by either IR or by ABC after closing isolated overt collecting system defects. No additional IR was performed in patients with ABC. Estimated blood loss (EBL), WIT, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change, on- vs. off-clamp procedure as well as Clavien-Dindo > 2 complications in both groups were compared. Eighty-seven (51.1%) patients had ABC and 83 (48.9%) had IR as their tumor bed control method. Tumor size, side and RENAL nephrometry score in both groups were similar. Mean warm ischemia time (WIT) was 20.8 min in ABC group and 23.8 min in IR group (p = 0.03). In 4–7 cm tumors, WIT was 19.9 min in ABC group while 26.6 min in IR group (p = 0.026). eGFR change from baseline and EBL favored ABC in entire cohort as well as in 4–7 cm tumors with statistical significance. There were more off-clamp procedures with ABC in ≤ 4 cm tumors. No ABC specific complications were observed. Within 2 years of follow-up, no patient developed recurrences. The control of the tumor base with ABC during RAPN shortens the warm ischemia times significantly compared to IR. Besides, ABC had better EBL and GFR changes outcomes. With close monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure and frequent venting, disturbing complications of ABC could completely be avoided. ABC was found to be feasible, safe and effective during RAPN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Our data are available if needed.

References

  1. Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, Jang TL, Russo P (2009) Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors—is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol 181(1):55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kates M, Badalato GM, Pitman M, McKiernan JM (2011) Increased risk of overall and cardiovascular mortality after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma 2 cm or less. J Urol 186(4):1247–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Lam T, Marconi L, Merseburger AS et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67(5):913–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang KD, Abdel Raheem A, Kim KH, Oh CK, Park SY, Kim YS, Ham WS, Han WK, Choi YD, Chung BH et al (2018) Functional and oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched-pair analyses with a median of 5 years' follow-up. BJU Int 122(4):618–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang C, Xu Y, Zhang Z, Qiao B, Yang K, Liu R, Ma B (2012) Laparoscopic simple enucleation and coagulation on tumor bed using argon beam coagulator for treating small renal cell carcinomas: an animal study followed by clinical application. Med Sci Monit 18(5):193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Quinlan DM, Naslund MJ, Brendler CB (1992) Application of argon beam coagulation in urological surgery. J Urol 147(2):410–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shin TJ, Song C, Kim CS, Ahn H (2020) Surgical details and renal function change after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 27:457–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Eyraud R, Samarasekera D, Laydner H, Panumatrassamee K, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2013) Three-year oncologic and renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 64(5):744–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dagenais J, Maurice MJ, Mouracade P, Kara O, Malkoc E, Kaouk JH (2017) Excisional precision matters: understanding the influence of excisional volume loss on renal function after partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 72(2):168–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zargar H, Akca O, Ramirez D, Brandao LF, Laydner H, Krishnan J, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2015) The impact of extended warm ischemia time on late renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 29(4):444–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Orvieto MA, Tolhurst SR, Chuang MS, Lyon MB, Ritch CR, Rapp DE, Shalhav AL (2005) Defining maximal renal tolerance to warm ischemia in porcine laparoscopic and open surgery model. Urology 66(5):1111–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Fergany A, Frank I, Gill IS, Blute ML, Campbell SC (2010) Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 58(3):340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Acar O, Esen T, Musaoglu A, Vural M (2014) Do we need to clamp the renal hilum liberally during the initial phase of the learning curve of robot-assisted nephron-sparing surgery? ScientificWorldJournal 2014:498917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Antonelli A, Veccia A, Francavilla S, Bertolo R, Bove P, Hampton LJ, Mari A, Palumbo C, Simeone C, Minervini A et al (2019) On-clamp versus off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urologia 86(2):52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bertolo R, Simone G, Garisto J, Nakhoul G, Armanyous S, Agudelo J, Costantini M, Tuderti G, Gallucci M, Kaouk J (2019) Off-clamp vs on-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes from a propensity-score matching between two high-volume centers. Eur J Surg Oncol 45(7):1232–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohenpour M, Strauss S, Gottlieb P, Peer A, Rimon U, Stav K, Gayer G (2007) Pseudoaneurysm of the renal artery following partial nephrectomy: imaging findings and coil embolization. Clin Radiol 62(11):1104–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bahler CD, Sundaram CP (2016) Effect of renal reconstruction on renal function after partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 30(Suppl 1):S37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Petros F, Sukumar S, Haber GP, Dulabon L, Bhayani S, Stifelman M, Kaouk J, Rogers C (2012) Multi-institutional analysis of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors >4 cm versus </= 4 cm in 445 consecutive patients. J Endourol 26(6):642–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ficarra V, Bhayani S, Porter J, Buffi N, Lee R, Cestari A, Novara G, Mottrie A (2012) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm: results of a multicenter, international series. World J Urol 30(5):665–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Takagi T, Kondo T, Tajima T, Campbell SC, Tanabe K (2014) Enhanced computed tomography after partial nephrectomy in early postoperative period to detect asymptomatic renal artery pseudoaneurysm. Int J Urol 21(9):880–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tohi Y, Murata S, Makita N, Suzuki I, Kubota M, Sugino Y, Inoue K, Ueda H, Kawakita M (2020) Absence of asymptomatic unruptured renal artery pseudoaneurysm on contrast-enhanced computed tomography after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy without parenchymal renorrhaphy. Asian J Urol 7(1):24–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tachibana H, Takagi T, Kondo T, Ishida H, Tanabe K (2018) Comparison of perioperative outcomes with or without renorrhaphy during open partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Int Braz J Urol 44(3):467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hernandez AD, Smith JA Jr, Jeppson KG, Terreros DA (1990) A controlled study of the argon beam coagulator for partial nephrectomy. J Urol 143(5):1062–1065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolf JS Jr, Stoller ML (1994) The physiology of laparoscopy: basic principles, complications and other considerations. J Urol 152(2 Pt 1):294–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Neuhaus SJ, Gupta A, Watson DI (2001) Helium and other alternative insufflation gases for laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 15(6):553–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weld KJ, Ames CD, Landman J, Morrissey K, Connor T, Hruby G, Allaf ME, Bhayani SB (2005) Evaluation of intra-abdominal pressures and gas embolism during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a porcine model. J Urol 174(4 Pt 1):1457–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shanberg AM, Zagnoev M, Clougherty TP (2002) Tension pneumothorax caused by the argon beam coagulator during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 168(5):2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH (2015) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67(5):891–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Koç University, 34010, İstanbul, Turkey

    Kayhan Tarim, Abdullah Erdem Canda, Yakup Kordan, Mevlana Derya Balbay, Omer Acar & Tarik Esen

  2. Department of Urology, VKF American Hospital, 34365, Istanbul, Turkey

    Mert Kilic, Mevlana Derya Balbay & Tarik Esen

  3. Department of Urology, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ersin Koseoglu

Authors
  1. Kayhan Tarim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mert Kilic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ersin Koseoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abdullah Erdem Canda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yakup Kordan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mevlana Derya Balbay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Omer Acar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tarik Esen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kayhan Tarim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Kayhan Tarim, MertKilic, Ersin Koseoglu, Abdullah E. Canda, Yakup Kordan, Mevlana D. Balbay, Omer Acar and Tarik Esen declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Koç University School of Medicine (2020.284.IRB2.075).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarim, K., Kilic, M., Koseoglu, E. et al. Feasibility, safety and efficacy of argon beam coagulation in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for solid renal masses ≤ 7 cm in size. J Robotic Surg 15, 671–677 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01158-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01158-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation