Skip to main content
Log in

Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe changes in rates of types of hysterectomy at a tertiary care community teaching hospital since the introduction of laparoscopic and robotic techniques and to determine the effect of surgeon characteristics on route of hysterectomy. This is a retrospective analysis of types of hysterectomies performed for benign disease during five different years (1989, 1994, 1999, 2004, 2009) at a large community teaching hospital. Hospital discharge data was reviewed to identify all hysterectomies performed during the first six months of each year of the study. Hospital charts were reviewed and patient characteristics, indication for surgery, type of hysterectomy and surgeon characteristics were recorded. Hysterectomies performed for malignancy, suspected malignancy, or postpartum hemorrhage were excluded. Types of hysterectomies included abdominal (AH), vaginal (VH), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal (LAVH), total laparoscopic (TLH), laparoscopic supracervical (LSH) and robotic-assisted (RH). The progressive introduction of newer minimally invasive surgical techniques (LAVH, TLH, LSH, and RH) resulted in an overall reduction in the abdominal hysterectomy rate from 77 to 35.2 % during the time of the study. The majority of abdominal, laparoscopic supracervical and robotic hysterectomies were performed by generalists, while the majority of vaginal, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed by fellowship trained subspecialists. Minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques significantly reduced the rate of abdominal hysterectomies. The LSH and RH were the techniques utilized by generalists as their most preferred minimally invasive surgical approaches to hysterectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reich H, De Caprio J, Mac Glynn F (1989) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 5:213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3): Art. No.: CD003677. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4

  3. Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL (2009) Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:581–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. (2009) Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 114:1156–8

  5. (2011) AAGL Position Statement: Route of hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:1–3

  6. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG (2007) Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 110:1091–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A (2009) Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 114:1041–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyd LR, Novetsky AP, Curtin JP (2010) Effect of surgical volume on route of hysterectomy and short-term morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 116:909–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brenot K, Goyert GL (2009) Impact of robotic surgery on obstetric-gynecologic resident training. J Reprod Med 54:675–677

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matthews CA, Reid N, Ramakrishnan V, Hull K, Cohen S (2010) Evaluation of the introduction of robotic technology on route of hysterectomy and complications in the first year of use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:499.e1-5

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harris MB, Olive DL (1994) Changing hysterectomy patterns after introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:340–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weber AM, Lee JC (1996) Use of alternative techniques of hysterectomy in Ohio, 1988–1994. N Engl J Med 335:483–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brummer TH, Jalkanen J, Fraser J, Heikkinen AM, Kauko M, Makinen J, Puistola U, Sjoberg J, Tomas E, Harkki P (2009) FINHYST 2006—national prospective 1-year survey of 5,279 hysterectomies. Hum Reprod 24:2515–2522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J (2009) A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. Br J Obstet Gynecol 116:492–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Cohen SL, Wright KN, Shah NT, Chavan N, Einarsson JI (2011) Increasing minimally invasive hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 117:1142–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, Strauss LT, Xia Z, Peterson HB (1994) Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988–1990. Obstet Gynecol 83:549–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Julian TM (2008) Vaginal hysterectomy. An apparent exception to evidence-based decision making. Obstet Gynecol 111:812–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Twijnstra ARH, Kolkman W, Trimbos-Kemper GCM, Jansen FW (2010) Implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: national overview of trends. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:487–492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers RM, Julian TM (2005) Training the gynecologic surgeon. Obstet Gynecol 105:197–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pulliam SJ, Berkowitz LR (2009) Smaller pieces of the hysterectomy pie. Obstet Gynecol 113:395–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schimpf MO, Feldman DM, OSullivan DM, LaSala CA (2007) Resident education and training in urogynecology and pelvic reconstructive surgery: a survey. Int Urogynecol J 18:613–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kenton K, Sultana C, Rogers RG, Lowenstein T, Fenner D (2008) How well are we training residents in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:567.e1-567.e4

  23. Einarsson JI, Young A, Tsien L, Sangi-Haghpeykar H (2002) Perceived proficiency in endoscopic techniques among senior obstetrics and gynecology residents. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:158–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Einarsson JI, Sangi-Haghpeykar H (2009) Perceived proficiency in minimally-invasive surgery among senior Ob/Gyn residents. JSLS 13:473–478

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Burkett D, Horwitz J, Kennedy V, Murphy D, Graziano S, Kenton K (2011) Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 17:210–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, Chavan NR, Sangi-Haghpeykar H (2010) Minimally invasive hysterectomies—a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:167–175

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Moen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moen, M., Noone, M., Cholkeri-Singh, A. et al. Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors. J Robotic Surg 8, 13–17 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0412-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0412-5

Keywords

Navigation