Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correlation Between Symptomatic Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Erosive Esophagitis (EE) Post-vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (VSG)

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the preferred bariatric procedure in many countries. However, there is one shortcoming of LSG in the long-term follow-up and this is the onset of GERD and erosive esophagitis (EE). Current evidence of the effect of SG on GERD did not consolidate to a consensus. In this study, we objectively evaluate the incidence of EE 1 year post-LSG with upper endoscopy (EGD) and try to identify the significant variables and possible underlying mechanisms of the EE post-LSG.

Methods

Over a period of 5 years (2011–2016) at Singapore General Hospital, we retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of a cohort of patients whom had LSG by a single surgeon who routinely performed EGD pre-operative and 1 year post-operative to assess EE and hiatal hernia. Patient’s endoscopic findings and demographic and anthropometric data were analyzed.

Results

We identified a total of 97 obese patients who underwent LSG at our hospital by studied surgeon. Sixty-three patients (64.9% of original sample) were finally evaluated in the present study, 40 (59.7%) of whom were female. The mean (range) age of patients was 38.2 (18–66) years, and mean BMI was 36.3 ± 4.1 kg/m2. Median time to follow-up EGD was 13 months (range, 12–15). Following LSG, there was a significant decrease in both BMI (42.1 ± 1.2 vs. 29.9 ± 1.0 kg/m2) and percentage excess weight loss of 56.6 ± 3.6%. The prevalence of EE on endoscopy increased from 9 (14.3%) to 28 (44.4%) patients. Of which 15 (23.8%) were grade A, 11 (17.5%) were grade B, and 2 (3.2%) were grade C. There was no correlation between GERD symptoms with EE; however, our study found a trend suggesting higher prevalence of EE with a sleeve diameter measuring > 2 cm wide (p = 0.069).

Conclusion

Although LSG is effective in treating obesity and its metabolic syndromes, the prevalence of EE increased significantly 1 year after the surgery. Since we do not fully understand the long-term impact of chronic esophagitis in post-sleeve population, we recommend follow-up EGD assessment post-operatively and treat the esophagitis if present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO Media Centre: Obesity and overweight. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html 2014. Accessed March, 2017

  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Washington, DC: U.S. DHHS, Public Health Service (PHS) 1998

  3. Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JEet al. VanItallie TB Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. JAMA 1999;282:1530–1538

  4. Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1567–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery and endoluminal procedures: IFSO worldwide survey 2014. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2279–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jossart GH, Anthone G, et al. The history of sleeve gastrectomy. Bariatric Times. 2010;7:9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8:267–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marceau P, Biron Simon, St Georges R, at al. Biliopancreatic diversion with gastrectomy as surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg 1991;1:381–387

  9. Kim WW, Gagner M, Kini S, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch: a comparative study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:552–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Daes J, Jimenez ME, Said N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux can be reduced by changes in surgical technique. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1874–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiu S, Birch DW, Shi X. Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:510–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. GUT. 1999;45:172–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadiere GB. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1450–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Braghetto I, Csendes A, Korn O, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:148–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lakdawala MA, Bhasker A, Mulchandani D, et al. Comparison between the results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the Indian population: a retrospective 1 year study. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carter PR, LeBlanc KA, Hausmann MG, et al. Association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:569–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Howard DD, Caban AM, Cendan JC, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:709–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tai CM, Huang CK, Lee YC, et al. Increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and erosive esophagitis 1 year after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy among obese adults. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1260–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Genco A, Soricelli E, Casella G, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a possible, underestimated long-term complication. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(4):568–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaheen NJ, Richter JE. Barrett’s oesophagus. Lancet 2009;7:373:850–861

  21. Frederik HJ, Lars P, Asbjorn MD, et al. Incidence of adenocarcionoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus. NEJM. 2011;365:1375–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Braghetto I, Csendes A. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in bariatric patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):710–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mion F, Tolone S, Garros A, et al. High-resolution impedance manometry after sleeve gastrectomy: increased intragastric pressure and reflux are frequent events. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2449–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burgerhart JS, van Rutte PWJ, Edelbroek MAK, et al. Association between postprandial symptoms and gastric emptying after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015;25:209–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Melissas J, Leventi A, Klinaki I, et al. Alterations of global gastrointestinal motility after sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2013;258:976–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Michalsky D, Dvorak P, Belacek J, et al. Radical resection of the pyloric antrum and its effect on gastric emptying after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2013;23:567–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shah S, Shah P, Todkar J, et al. Prospective controlled study of effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on small bowel transit time and gastric emptying half-time in morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:152–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Braghetto I, Davanzo C, Korn O, et al. Scintigraphic evaluation of gastric emptying in obese patients submitted to sleeve gastrectomy compared to normal subjects. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1515–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernstine H, Tzioni-Yehoshua R, Groshar D, et al. Gastric emptying is not affected by sleeve gastrectomy—scintigraphic evaluation of gastric emptying after sleeve gastrectomy without removal of the gastric antrum. Obes Surg. 2009;19:293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Melissas J, Koukouraki S, Askoxylakis J, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy–a restrictive procedure? Obes Surg. 2007;17:57–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Melissas J, Daskalakis M, Koukouraki S, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy—a “food limiting” operation. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1251–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Samuel B, Atiemo K, Cohen P, et al. The effect of sleeve gastrectomy on gastroparesis: a short clinical review. Bariatric Surg Pract Patient Care. 2016;11:84–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chin Hong Lim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest Statement

Author 1, author 2, author 3, author 4, author 5, author 6, author 7 & author 8 have nothing to disclose.

Ethics Approval Statement

For this type of retrospective study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, C.H., Lee, P.C., Lim, E. et al. Correlation Between Symptomatic Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Erosive Esophagitis (EE) Post-vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (VSG). OBES SURG 29, 207–214 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3509-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3509-0

Keywords

Navigation