Skip to main content
Log in

Prophylactic Inferior Vena Cava Filters in High-Risk Bariatric Surgery

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bariatric patients are at significant risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and a subset may benefit from retrievable inferior vena cava filters (rIVCFs). Optimal VTE prophylaxis and a consensus on factors which make bariatric patients high risk have not been established. This study describes our experience with the use of rIVCFs in combination with chemoprophylaxis for high-risk bariatric surgery patients.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of high-risk patients bariatric surgery patients. Patients with a hypercoaguable condition, prior history of VTE, body mass index (BMI) > 55 kg/m2, and severe immobility were considered high risk. Patients underwent rIVCF placement and standard chemoprophylaxis. A venogram was performed at retrieval.

Results

Forty-four patients, age of 48 ± 12 years and BMI of 58.4 ± 9.4 kg/m2 underwent gastric bypass with rIVCF placement. Follow-up was 204 days. One patient had a preoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT). All patients received chemoprophylaxis and rIVCF placement. Indications for rIVCF were BMI (68%), prior VTE (30%), and immobility (2%). The operation was performed laparoscopically in all patients, and the mean operative time was 106.1 ± 21.6 min and length of stay was 3.1 ± 1.2 days. Postoperative venous duplex revealed two DVTs (5%). Retrieval was successful in 28 patients. No significant thrombus was found on venogram. Two minor complications of filter placement occurred. One mortality occurred due to MI, and no pulmonary emboli were clinically evident.

Conclusions

rIVCFs in our cohort of high-risk bariatric surgery patients was associated with an acceptably low incidence of DVT (5%) and no clinically evident PE. Despite safe removal after long dwell times, previous data suggest that rIVCFs are associated with a higher incidence of VTE. Thus, filters, if placed, should be removed once the risk of VTE has passed. Larger multicenter studies are needed to truly identify long-term safety and efficacy of rIVCFs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rocha AT, de Vasconcellos AG, da Luz Neto ER, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized obese medical patients and in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16(12):1645–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carmody BJ, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, et al. Pulmonary embolism complicating bariatric surgery: detailed analysis of a single institution’s 24-year experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(6):831–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gargiulo 3 rd NJ, Veith FJ, Lipsitz EC, et al. The incidence of pulmonary embolism in open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;21(5):556–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldhaber SZ, Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, et al. A prospective study of risk factors for pulmonary embolism in women. JAMA. 1997;277(8):642–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamad GG, Bergqvist D. Venous thromboembolism in bariatric surgery patients: an update of risk and prevention. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(1):97–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansson PO, Eriksson H, Welin L, et al. Smoking and abdominal obesity: risk factors for venous thromboembolism among middle-aged men: “the study of men born in 1913”. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(16):1886–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cotter SA, Cantrell W, Fisher B, et al. Efficacy of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15(9):1316–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frezza EE, Wachtel MS. A simple venous thromboembolism prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14(11):1961–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamad GG, Choban PS. Enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: findings of the prophylaxis against VTE outcomes in bariatric surgery patients receiving enoxaparin (PROBE) study. Obes Surg. 2005;15(10):1368–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller MT, Rovito PF. An approach to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14(6):731–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shepherd MF, Rosborough TK, Schwartz ML. Heparin thromboprophylaxis in gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2003;13(2):249–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prystowsky JB, Morasch MD, Eskandari MK, et al. Prospective analysis of the incidence of deep venous thrombosis in bariatric surgery patients. Surgery. 2005;138(4):759–63. discussion 763–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation. 2005;112(3):416–22

  14. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du risque d’embolie pulmonaire par interruption cave study group. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(7):409–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gargiulo 3 rd NJ, Veith FJ, Lipsitz EC, et al. Experience with inferior vena cava filter placement in patients undergoing open gastric bypass procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(6):1301–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuster R, Hagedorn JC, Curet MJ, et al. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters may be safely applied in gastric bypass surgery. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2277–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Halmi D, Kolesnikov E. Preoperative placement of retreivable inferior vena cava filters in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(6):602–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rajasekhar A, Crowther M. Inferior vena caval filter insertion prior to bariatric surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(6):1266–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vaziri K, Bhanot P, Hungness ES, et al. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(10):2203–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB, et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(3):449–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barba CA, Harrington C, Loewen M. Status of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among bariatric surgeons: have we changed our practice during the past decade? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(3):352–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sapala JA, Wood MH, Schuhknecht MP, et al. Fatal pulmonary embolism after bariatric operations for morbid obesity: a 24-year retrospective analysis. Obes Surg. 2003;13(6):819–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Crochet DP, Brunel P, Trogrlic S, et al. Long-term follow-up of Vena Tech-LGM filter: predictors and frequency of caval occlusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(2 Pt 1):137–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Galhotra S, Amesur NB, Zajko AB, et al. Migration of the Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter to the chest. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18(12):1581–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parkin E, Serracino-Inglott F, Chalmers N, et al. Symptomatic perforation of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter after a dwell time of 5 years. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(2):417–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schweitzer M, Steele KE, Lidor A, et al. Acute vena cava thrombosis after placement of retrievable inferior vena cava filter before laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(6):661–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Veroux M, Tallarita T, Pennisi M, et al. Late complication from a retrievable inferior vena cava filter with associated caval, aortic, and duodenal perforation: a case report. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(1):223–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Piano G, Ketteler ER, Prachand V, et al. Safety, feasibility, and outcome of retrievable vena cava filters in high-risk surgical patients. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(4):784–8. discussion 788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Binkert CA, Sasadeusz K, Stavropoulos SW. Retrievability of the recovery vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(2 Pt 1):299–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Terhaar OA, Lyon SM, Given MF, et al. Extended interval for retrieval of Gunther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15(11):1257–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

Drs. Vaziri, Lee, Brody, Sarin, Ignacio, Chun, and Lin have no financial ties or conflicts of interest to disclose. Mr. Watson and Ms. Harper have no financial ties or conflicts of interest to disclose. Dr. Venbrux has received honoraria for lectures from Bard, Cook, Cordis, and Rex medical. Dr. Venbrux is also a consultant for Bard Peripheral Vascular

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khashayar Vaziri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaziri, K., Devin Watson, J., Harper, A.P. et al. Prophylactic Inferior Vena Cava Filters in High-Risk Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 21, 1580–1584 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0301-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0301-1

Keywords

Navigation