Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Noninvasive Evaluation of Abdominal Fat and Liver Changes Following Progressive Weight Loss in Severely Obese Patients Treated with Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

  • Research
  • Clinical
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a chronic complex disease, consequence of an unbalance between energy intake and expenditure and of the interaction between predisposing genotype and facilitating environmental factors. The aim of the study was to evaluate body composition, abdominal fat, and metabolic changes in a group of severely obese patients before and after laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) at standardized (10% and 25%) total weight loss.

Methods

Twenty-eight patients (14 M, 14 F; age 41.71 ± 6.9 years; body mass index (BMI) 49.76 ± 5.8 kg/m2) were treated with laparoscopic gastric bypass. All evaluations before surgery and after achieving ~10% and ~25% weight loss (WL). Body composition was assessed by bioimpedance analysis; resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured by indirect calorimetry.

Results

Body weight, BMI, and waist circumference significantly decreased at 10% and 25% WL. We observed a significant reduction of both RMR (2,492 ± 388 at entry vs. 2,098 ± 346.6 at 10% WL vs. 2,035 ± 312 kcal per 24 h at 25% WL, p = 0.001 vs. baseline) as well as of RMR corrected for fat-free mass (FFM; 35.7 ± 6.7 vs. 34.9 ± 9.0 at 10% WL vs. 33.5 ± 5.4 at 25% WL kilocalorie per kilogram FFM × 24 h, p = 0.041 vs. baseline). Body composition analysis showed a relative increase in FFM and a reduction of fat mass at 25% WL. A significant reduction in blood glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment index was observed. Ultrasonography showed a marked decrease in the signs of hepatic steatosis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study confirms that LGBP is a safe procedure in well-selected severely obese patients and has early favorable effects on both metabolic parameters and body composition. Longer-term observations are required for in-depth evaluation of body composition changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, et al. Body mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and metabolic prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371:569–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hsu IR, Kim SP, Kabir M, et al. Metabolic syndrome, hyperinsulinemia, and cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:867–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Olshansky SY, Passaro DJ, Hershow RC, et al. A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(11):1138–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007;56:2655–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Contaldo F, Pasanisi F, Finelli C, et al. Obesity, heart failure and sudden death. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2002;12(4):190–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003;37:917–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, et al. Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:134–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Colicchio P, Tarantino G, del Genio F, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in young adult severely obese non-diabetic patients in South Italy. Ann Nutr Metab. 2005;49:289–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stampfer MJ, Maclure KM, Colditz GA, et al. Risk of symptomatic gallstones in women with severe obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55:652–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. NIH. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel (Adult Treatment Panel III). Bethesda: NIH Publication; 2001. p. 01-3670.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bedogni G, Bellentani S, Miglioli L, et al. The Fatty Liver Index: a simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2006;6:33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. del Genio F, Alfonsi L, Marra M, et al. Metabolic and nutritional status changes after 10% weight loss in severely obese patients treated with laparoscopic surgery vs integrated medical treatment. Obes Surg. 2007;17(12):1592–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saverymuttu SH, Joseph AEA, Maxwell JA. Ultrasound scanning in the detection of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis. Br Med J. 1986;292:13–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ricci C, Longo R, Gioulis E, et al. Noninvasive in vivo quantitative assessment of fat content in human liver. J Hepatol. 1997;27:108–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Osawa H, Mori Y. Sonographic diagnosis of fatty liver using a histogram technique that compares liver and renal cortical amplitude. J Clin Ultrasound. 1996;24:25–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ribeiro-Filho FF, Faria AN, Azjen S, et al. Methods of estimation of visceral fat: advantages of ultrasonography. Obes Res. 2003;11:1488–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cignarelli M, DePergola G, Picca G, et al. Relationship of obesity and body fat distribution with ceruloplasmin serum levels. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996;20:809–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Targher G, Tonoli M, Agostino G, et al. Ultrasonographic intra-abdominal depth and its relation to haemostatic factors in healthy males. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996;20:882–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rissanen P, Makimattila S, Vehmas T, et al. Effect of weight loss and regional fat distribution on plasma leptin concentration in obese women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23:645–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kinoshita T, Ittoh M. Longitudinal variance of fat mass deposition during pregnancy evaluated by ultrasonography: the ratio of visceral fat to subcutaneous fat in the abdomen. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;61(2):115–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anonymous. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: National institutes of health consensus development conference draft statement. Obes Surg. 1991;1:257–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buchwald H, Williams SE. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003. Obes Surg. 2004;14(9):1157–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harris ML, Flegal KM, Cowie LL, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in US adults: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988–94. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:518–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Colditz GA, Willet WC, Rotnitky A, et al. Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes in women. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:481–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222(3):339–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Despres JP. The insulin-resistance-dyslipidemic syndrome of visceral obesity: effect on patient’s risk. Obes Rev. 1998;6(1):8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubino F, Gagner M, Gentileschi P, et al. The early effect of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on hormones involved in body weight regulation and glucose metabolism. Ann Surg. 2004;240:236–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoene M, Weigert C. The role of interleukin-6 in insulin-resistance, body fat distribution and energy balance. Obes Rev. 2008;9:20–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Benedetti G, Mingrone G, Marcoccia S, et al. Body composition and energy expenditure after weight loss following bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000;19:270–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Carey DG, Pliego GJ, Raymond RL. Body composition and metabolic changes following bariatric surgery: effects on fat mass, lean mass and basal metabolic rate: six months to one-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1602–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. de Boer JO, van Es AJH, Roovers LCA, et al. Adaptation of energy metabolism of overweight women to low-energy intake, studied with whole body calorimeters. Am J Clin Nutr. 1986;44:585–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kushner RF, Schoeller DA, Field CR, et al. Is the impedance index (ht2/R) significant in predicting total body water? Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56(5):835–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Marra M, Caldara A, Montagnese C, et al. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in constitutionally lean females, ballet dancers and patients with anorexia nervosa. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008; in press

  35. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, et al. The contribution of sonography to the measurement of intra abdominal fat. J Clin Ultrasound. 1990;18:563–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vlachos IS, Hatziioannou A, Perelas A, et al. Sonographic assessment of regional adiposity. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1545–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Koda M, Senda M, Kamba M, et al. Sonographic subcutaneous and visceral fat indices represent the distribution of body fat volume. Abdom Imaging. 2007;32:387–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Robbi R, et al. Total and intra-abdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computerized tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993;17:209–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tornaghi G, Raiteri R, Pozzato C, et al. Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1994;18:771–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Abe T, Kawakami Y, Sugita M, et al. Use of B-mode ultrasound for visceral fat mass evaluation: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging. Appl Human Sci. 1995;14:133–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Pontiroli AE, Pizzocri P, Giacomelli M, et al. Ultrasound measurement of visceral and subcutaneous fat in morbidly obese patients before and after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: comparison with computerized tomography and with anthropometric measurements. Obes Surg. 2002;12:648–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Stolk RP, Meijer R, Mali WP, et al. Ultrasound measurements of intra abdominal fat estimate the metabolic syndrome better than do measurements of waist circumference. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:857–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Minocci A, Savia G, Lucantoni R, et al. Leptin plasma concentrations are dependent on body fat distribution in obese patients. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:1139–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ribeiro-Filho FF, Faria AN, Kohlmann O Jr, et al. Ultrasonography for the evaluation of visceral fat and cardiovascular risk. Hypertension. 2001;38:713–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim SK, Kim HJ, Hur KY, et al. Visceral fat thickness measured by ultrasonography can estimate not only visceral obesity but also risks of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:593–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Leite CC, Wajchenberg BL, Radominski R, et al. Intra-abdominal thickness by ultrasonography to predict risk factors for cardiovascular disease and its correlation with anthropometric measurements. Metab. 2002;51:1034–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Busetto L, Tregnaghi A, De Marchi F, et al. Liver volume and visceral obesity in women with hepatic steatosis undergoing gastric banding. Obes Res. 2002;10(5):408–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Interuniversity Center for Obesity and Eating Disorder (CISRO), Federico II School of Medicine, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy

    Federica del Genio, Maurizio Marra, Lucia Alfonsi, Carmine Finelli, Franco Contaldo & Fabrizio Pasanisi

  2. I Department of General and Gastroenterologic Surgery, Second University, Naples, Italy

    Gianmattia del Genio

  3. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine “F. Magrassi e A. Lanzara”, Second University, Naples, Italy

    Ilario De Sio

Authors
  1. Federica del Genio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gianmattia del Genio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ilario De Sio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maurizio Marra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lucia Alfonsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Carmine Finelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Franco Contaldo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fabrizio Pasanisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica del Genio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

del Genio, F., del Genio, G., De Sio, I. et al. Noninvasive Evaluation of Abdominal Fat and Liver Changes Following Progressive Weight Loss in Severely Obese Patients Treated with Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 19, 1664–1671 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9891-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9891-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation