Abstract
Background
The stapled gastrojejunostomy of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) can be created by linear and circular stapling techniques. In the circular-stapled technique, the anvil of the stapler can be introduced into the gastric pouch transabdominally or pulled down the esophagus (transorally) by attachment to a modified gastric tube. The purpose of this study is to determine if the transoral technique to introduce the anvil will reduce operative time and cost compared with the transabdominal technique, which requires creating a new gastrotomy to insert the anvil and followed by its closure.
Methods
We compared 60 consecutive morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic RYGBP. First 30 cases were performed by transabdominal anvil insertion, followed by 30 cases using transoral anvil insertion. All of the transabdominal cases were assisted by experienced fellows. The first ten transoral cases were assisted by experienced fellows and the remaining 20 by new fellows in order to evaluate if the transoral technique shortens the learning curve. Surgery duration and operative costs were compared. Complications (bleeding, leaks, anastomotic strictures, ulcers, wound infections) and length of stay were also evaluated. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Results
Mean operative time was shorter in the transoral group compared with the transabdominal group (162.2 ± 35.8 vs. 186 ± 33.6 min respectively, p = 0.01), even though most of the transoral cases (n = 20) were assisted by new fellows and all of the transabdominal cases by experienced fellows. Operative times were not different between new and experienced fellows in the transoral technique. Supply costs per patient were higher in the transabdominal technique compared with the transoral technique (2,983.5 ± 540.9 vs. 2,658.8 ± 474.4 USD, respectively, p = 0.03). Perioperative complications and length of stay were not statistically different.
Conclusion
The transoral introduction of the anvil of the circular stapler into the gastric pouch is a simple, safe, and efficient technique for creating the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic RYGBP. In addition, the transoral technique is less expensive and appears to accelerate the learning curve compared with the transabdominal technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wright JD, Borrud LG, McDowell MA, et al. Nutrition assessment in the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2002. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:822–9.
Smith SC Jr, Clark LT, Cooper RS, et al. Discovering the full spectrum of cardiovascular disease: Minority Health Summit 2003: report of the Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, and Hypertension Writing Group. Circulation 2005;111:e134–9.
McGrath V, Needleman BJ, Melvin WS. Evolution of the laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003;13:221–7.
Long DA, Reed R, Lehman G. The cost of lifestyle health risks: obesity. J Occup Environ Med 2006;48:244–51.
Matthews BD, Sing RF, DeLegge MH, et al. Initial results with a stapled gastrojejunostomy for the laparoscopic isolated roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am J Surg 2000;179:476–81.
Gentileschi P, Kini S, Catarci M, et al. Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2002;16:736–44.
Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg 1995;222:339–50, discussion 350–2.
Cottam DR, Mattar SG, Schauer PR. Laparoscopic era of operations for morbid obesity. Arch Surg 2003;138:367–75.
Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S. Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Clin North Am 2001;81:1145–79.
Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg 2000;232:515–29.
Schauer PR. Open and laparoscopic surgical modalities for the management of obesity. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:468–75.
Blachar A, Federle MP, Pealer KM, et al. Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: clinical and imaging findings. Radiology 2002;223:625–32.
Gonzalez R, Lin E, Venkatesh KR, et al. Gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of 3 techniques. Arch Surg 2003;138:181–4.
Peters MB Jr, Ojeda HF, Reichenbach DJ, et al. Gastrotomy with anvil “dunk”: a novel technique for gastrojejunostomy in the patient undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2006;20:924–8.
Murr MM, Gallagher SF. Technical considerations for transabdominal loading of the circular stapler in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am J Surg 2003;185:585–8.
Teixeira JA, Borao FJ, Thomas TA, et al. An alternative technique for creating the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: experience with 28 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 2000;10:240–4.
Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Schubert KR. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: technique and results in 75 patients with 3–30 months follow-up. Obes Surg 1996;6:500–4.
Scott DJ, Provost DA, Jones DB. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: transoral or transgastric anvil placement? Obes Surg 2000;10:361–5.
Wittgrove AC, Clark GW. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y-500 patients: technique and results, with 3–60 month follow-up. Obes Surg 2000;10:233–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chavarriaga, L.F., Cook, M.W., White, B. et al. Transoral Technique for Gastrojejunostomy in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGBP) Can Accelerate Learning Curve and Reduce Cost. OBES SURG 20, 846–850 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9761-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9761-y