Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying pseudogenes from hypothetical proteins for making synthetic proteins

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Systems and Synthetic Biology

Abstract

Nature selected certain regions of the genome for encoding proteins. Most of the sequences were used to encode only RNA. What happened to the remaining sections of the genome? It is possible that some sequences were retired and retained as non-functional entities called pseudogenes. Though several evolutionary prospects with functional endpoints exist, we looked at the possibility of hypothetical proteins correlating with the emergence of pseudogenes and potential of such genes to make novel synthetic molecules. In this commentary, we consider two key aspects: (1) does any correlation exist between hypothetical proteins and pseudogenes and (2)—can we make novel and functional proteins from pseudogenes?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bianchi MM, Sartori G, Vandenbol M, Kaniak A, Uccelletti D, Mazzoni C, Di Rago JP, Carignani G, Slonimski PP, Frontali L (1999) How to bring orphan genes into functional. Yeast 15(6):513–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branca R, Orre L, Johansson H, Granholm V, Huss M, Pérez-Bercoff Å et al (2014) HiRIEF LC-MS enables deep proteome coverage and unbiased proteogenomics. Nat Methods 11(1):59–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar PK, Thwin CS, Tun K, Tsumoto Y, Maurer-Stroh S, Eisenhaber F, Surana U (2009) Synthesizing non-natural parts from natural genomic template. J Biol Eng 3(3):2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dujon B (1996) The yeast genome project: what did we learn? Trends Genet 12:263–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortugno LP (2007) Frontiers in Breast Cancer Research. Nova Publishers, New York, p 195

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin MY, Koonin EV (2004) Conserved hypothetical’ proteins: prioritization of targets for experimental study. Nucleic Acids Res 32(18):5452–5463

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knies K, Schuster B, Ameziane N, Rooimans M, Bettecken T, de Winter J, Schindler D (2012) Genotyping of fanconi anemia patients by whole exome sequencing: advantages and challenges. PLoS ONE 7(12):e52648

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lan L, Djuric N, Guo Y, Vucetic S (2013) MS-kNN: protein function prediction by integrating multiple data sources. BMC Bioinformatics 14(3):S8

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sivashankari S, Shanmughavel P (2006) Functional annotation of hypothetical proteins—A review. Bioinformation 1(8):335–338

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Zhang D, Li J (2013) PREAL: prediction of allergenic protein by maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) feature selection. BMC Syst Biol 7(5):S9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (2008) I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9:40

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashanth Suravajhala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shidhi, P.R., Nair, A.S. & Suravajhala, P. Identifying pseudogenes from hypothetical proteins for making synthetic proteins. Syst Synth Biol 8, 169–171 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11693-014-9148-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11693-014-9148-4

Keywords

Navigation