Skip to main content
Log in

Fragmentation patterns and systematic transitions of the forested landscape in the upper Amazon region, Ecuador 1990–2008

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The analysis of the systematic transitions in the forested landscape and the study of the forest fragmentation patterns allow us to deepen our understanding of the changes in the vegetation ground cover. The importance of knowing the intricate patterns of the land usage of the upper basin of the Amazon region is widely recognized. This zone is one of the most diverse biological areas in the world, is home to large areas of mature tropical cloud forest and demonstrates high probabilities of stable climatic conditions in light of global warming. The research quantified systematic transitions through the “loss” and “gain” of the different categories of landscape during the eighteen-year study period of the Ecuadorian Amazon Region (EAR), the forest fragmentation patterns were also analyzed based on a set of indicators. Therefore, with respect to the entirety of the landscape, the results registered for the ground coverage in forested areas during the first period (1990–2000), show a decrease of 6.99% and an increase of 0.68%; and during the second period (2000–2008), show a decrease of 3.99% and an increase of 2.14%. It demonstrated that forest and agricultural areas tended to replace or be replaced by herbaceous vegetation faster than expected fortuitously. Finally, the indices of fragmentation signaled intense changes during the 1990–2000 period with a reduction during the period 2000–2008. Percentages registered in the Largest Patch Index (LPI) were between 79.58%; 52.39% and 49.99% respectively; while the Patch Density (PD) varied between 0.04; 0.06 and 0.07. This suggests the propensity of forest cover to remain intact. The results of this investigation suggest a tendency towards stability in Ecuador’s Amazon landscape. Within the framework for development and management of this area, the tendency is natural regeneration. This permits a consolidation of the conservation, reforestation, forestation and agricultural forestry plans, programs and systems for the protected areas in EAR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta A. 2001. Brief Economic History of Ecuador. Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albornoz P. Andrade M, Araujo P, Gómez D, Mejía D, Pohlenz A, Torres F, Morales M. 2008. Geo Ecuador 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenteras D, Rudas G., Rodriguez N, Sua S, Romero M. 2006. Patterns and causes of deforestation in the Colombian Amazon. Ecological Indicators, 6: 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balée W, Erickson C. 2006. Time, Complexity, and Historial Ecology. United State America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benítez MJ, Martínez RM. 2003. Impact of Forest Fragmentation on Understory Plant Species Richness in Amazonia. Conservation Biology, 17: 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayuela L, Benayas JMR, Echeverría C. 2006. Clearance and fragmentation of tropical montane forests in the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico (1975–2000). Forest Ecology and Management, 226: 208–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G., Ehrlich PR. 2006. Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103: 19374–19379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox M. 2003. Effects of rainforest fragmentation on non-flying mammals of the Eastern Dorrigo Plateau, Australia. Biological Conservation, 115: 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries R, Hansen A, Newton A, Hansen M, 2005. Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years. Ecological Application, 15: 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debinski DM, Holt RD. 2000. A Survey and Overview of Habitat Fragmentation Experiments. Conservation Biology, 14: 342–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denevan WM. 2003. The Native Population of Amazonia in 1492 Reconsidered. Revista de Indias, LXIII(227):. 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK. 1998. Altered leaf-litter decomposition rates in tropical forest fragments. Oecología, 116: 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin TL, Pimienta M, Murillo E, Aschero V. 2004. Mapping patterns of β-diversity for beetles across the western Amazon Basin: A preliminary case for improving conservation strategies. Proc Calif Acad Sci, 56: 72–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz G., Russell G.J, Stouffer PC, Bierregaard RO, Pimm SL, Lovejoy TE. 2003. Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100: 14069–14073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finer M, Jenkins CN, Pimm SL, Keane B, Ross C. 2008. Oil and gas projects in the Western Amazon: threats to wilderness, biodiversity, and indigenous peoples. PloS one 3, e2932.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine G.. 2006. Globalization of the Amazon: an Andean perspective. Íconos, 25: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner TA, Barlow J, Chazdon R, Ewers RM, Harvey CA, Peres CA, Sodhi NS. 2009. Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world. Ecology Letters, 12: 561–582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guirado M, Pino J, Rodà F. 2006. Understorey plant species richness and composition in metropolitan forest archipelagos: effects of forest size, adjacent land use and distance to the edge. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15(1): 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, ter Steege H, Bermudez MA, Mora A, Sevink J, Sanmartín I, Sanchez-Meseguer A, Anderson CL, Figueiredo JP, Jaramillo C, Riff D, Negri FR, Hooghiemstra H, Lundberg J, Stadler T, Särkinen T, Antonelli A. 2010. Amazonia through time: Andean uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity. Science, 330: 927–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hugh DE, Belward AS, De Miranda EE, Di Bella CM, Gond V, Huber O, Jones S, Sgrenzaroli M, Fritz S. 2004. A land cover map of South America. Global Change Biology, 10: 731–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITTO (International Tropical Timber Organization) 2006. Ecuador. In: Status of Tropical Forest Management 2005. ITTO Technical Series 24, pp. 224–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killeen TJ, Douglas M, Consiglio T, Jørgensen PM, Mejia J. 2007. Dry spots and wet spots in the Andean hotspot. Journal of Biogeography, 34: 1357–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korning J, Thomsen K, Dalsgaard K. 1994. Characters of three Udults and their relevance to the composition and structure of virgin rain forest of Amazonian Ecuador. Geoderma, 63(2): 145–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb D, Erskine PD, Parrotta JA. 2005. Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science, 310: 1628–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Camargo JLC, Luizão RCC, Laurance, SG., Pimm SL, Bruna EM, Stouffer PC, Bruce Williamson G., Benítez-Malvido J, Vasconcelos HL. 2011. The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: A 32-year investigation. Biological Conservation, 144: 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Ferreira L, Rankin-de Merona J, Laurance SG., Hutchings R, Lovejoy TE. 1998. Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Recruitment Patterns in Amazonian Tree Communities. Conservation Biology, 12(2): 460–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Laurance SG., Ferreira L, Rankin-de Merona J, Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, 1997. Biomass collapse in Amazonian forest fragments. Science, 278: 1117–1118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Vasconcelos HL, Bruna EM, Didham RK, Stouffer PC, Gascon C, Bierregaard RO, Laurance SG., Sampaio E. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-Year investigation. Conservation Biology, 16: 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Peres CA. 2006. Emerging Threats to Tropical Forests. United States: University of Chicago Press, p. 520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HM, Ma YX, Liu WJ, Liu WJ. 2009. Clearance and fragmentation of tropical rain forest in Xishuangbanna, SW, China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18: 3421–3440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linera GW, Domíinguez-Gastelúu V, García-Zurita ME. 1998. Microenvironment and floristics of different edges in a Fragmented Tropical Rainforest. Conservation Biology, 12: 1091–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy TE, Bierregaard RO, Rylands AB, Malcol T Jr, Quintela CE, Harper LH, Brown KS, Powell AH, Schubart HO, Hays MB. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In: M. E. Soulé (ed), Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, pp. 257–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita RCG., Delamo P, Laurance WF. 1999. Efect of surrounding vegetation on edge-related tree mortality in Amazonian forest fragments. Biological Conservation, 91: 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski F, Metzger JP, Peres CA. 2010. Rural property size drives patterns of upland and riparian forest retention in a tropical deforestation frontier. Global Environmental Change, 20: 705–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran EF, Brondizio ES, Tucker JM, Clara M, Mccracken S, Falesi I. 2000. Effects of soil fertility and land-use on à nia forest succession in Amazo. Forest Ecology and Management, 139: 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PJC, Asner GP, Knapp DE, Almeyda A, Galván-gildemeister R, Keene S, Raybin RF, Smith RC. 2007. Land-use allocation protects the Peruvian Amazon. Science, 317: 2005–2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanavibool A, Dearden P, Kutintara U. 2005. Habitat fragmentation in north Thailand: a case study. Bird Conservation International, 14: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peralvo M, Jeaneth D. 2010. Methodological Protocol for the Ecuadorian Deforestation Map. Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres CA, Gardner TA, Barlow J, Zuanon J, Michalski F, Lees AC, Vieira ICG, Moreira FMS, Feeley KJ. 2010. Biodiversity conservation in human-modified Amazonian forest landscapes. Biological Conservation, 143: 2314–2327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichón FJ. 1997. Colonist land-allocation decisions, land use, and deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon frontier. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(4): 707–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitman N, Terborgh J, Silman M, Núñez P, Neill D Cerón C, Palacios W, Aulestia M. 2001. Dominance and distribution of tree species in upper Amazonian terra firme forests. Ecology, 82(8): 2101–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG., Shusas E, McEachern M. 2004. Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 101: 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranta P, Blom TOM. 1998. The fragmented Atlantic rain forest of Brazil: size, shape and distribution of forest fragments. Biodiversity and Conservation, 403: 385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revilla E, Palomares F, Delibes M. 2001. Edge-core effects and the effectiveness of traditional reserves in conservation: Eurasian badgers in Doñana National Park. Conservation Biology, 15: 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldarriaga JG., West DC, Tharp ML. 1988. Long-term chronosequence of forest succession in the upper Rio Negro of Colombia and Venezuela. Journal of Ecology, 76: 938–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scariot A. 1999. Forest fragmentation effects on palm diversity in central Amazonia. Journal of Ecology, 87: 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz JJ, Cayuela L, Echeverria C, Salas J, Rey Benayas JM. 2010. Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of Central Chile (1975–2008). Applied Geography, 30: 436–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierra R, Campos F, Chamberlin J. 2002. Assessing biodiversity conservation priorities: ecosystem risk and representativeness in continental Ecuador. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(2): 95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skole D, Tucker C. 1993. Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: satellite data from 1978–1988. Science, 260: 1905–1910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Brook BW, Peter Ng KL. 2004. Southeast sian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(12): 654–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sourdat M. 1986. Les sols de l’ Amazonie équatorienne: situation, nature, perspectives d’exploitation. Cahiers ORSTOM. Série Pédologie, 22(4): 409–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Steege H, Pitman N, Sabatier D, Castellanos H, Hout PVD, Day DC, Silveira M, Phillips O, Thomas R, Essen JV, Baider C, Maas P, Mori S, Terborgh J, Vargas Pn, Mogollon H, Morawetz W. 2003. A spatial model of tree a-diversity and tree density for the Amazon. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12(11): 2255–2277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steininger MK, Tucker CJ, Townshend JRG, Killeen J, Desch A, Bell V, Ersts P. 2000. Tropical deforestation in the Bolivian Amazon. Environmental Conservation, 28: 127–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer PC, Strong C, Naka LN. 2009. Twenty years of understorey bird extinctions from Amazonian rain forest fragments: consistent trends and landscape-mediated dynamics. Diversity and Distributions, 15: 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stotz Df, fitzpatrick JW, Parker TE, Moskowitz DK. 1996. Neotropical Birds, Ecology and Conservation. University of Chicago Press, p. 478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez E, Morales M, Cueva R, Utreras Bucheli V, Zapata-Ríos G, Toral E, Torres J, Prado W, Vargas Olalla J. 2009. Oil industry, wild meat trade and roads: indirect effects of oil extraction activities in a protected area in north-eastern Ecuador. Animal Conservation, 12: 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker NI, Murphy TM. 1997. The effects of ecological rehabilitation on vegetation recruitment: some observations from the Wet Tropics of North Queensland. Forest Ecology and Management, 99: 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Moss RH, Skole DL. 1993. Relating Land Use and Global Land-cover Change: A Proposal for an IGBP-HDP core Project. Report from the IGBP-HDP Working Group on Land-Use/Land-Cover Change (=IGBP Report 24/HDP Report 5), Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verchot L. 2010. Impacts of forest conversión to agriculture on microbial communities and microbial function. In: Dion, P. (ed.), Soil Biology and Agriculture in the Tropics. London, UK: Springer, pp. 45–63

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young BE, Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Boucher TM. 2004. Disappearing Jewels: The Status of New World Amphibians. Arlington, Virginia. NatureServe, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman C. 2003. Habitat fragmentation impacts on epiphyllous bryophyte communities in Central Amazonia. Ecology, 84(4): 948–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santiago Bonilla-Bedoya.

Additional information

Fund project: This work was supported by the National Secretary of Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation of Ecuador

Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonilla-Bedoya, S., Molina, J.R., Macedo-Pezzopane, J.E. et al. Fragmentation patterns and systematic transitions of the forested landscape in the upper Amazon region, Ecuador 1990–2008. Journal of Forestry Research 25, 301–309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0419-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0419-9

Keywords

Navigation