Skip to main content
Log in

Association between grip strength and bone mineral density in general US population of NHANES 2013–2014

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Association between strength of nonadjacent muscles and bone mineral density is unclear. We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to convince the effect of grip strength on femoral neck and lumbar spine mineral density in the general US population. This research can broaden the area of muscle-bone interaction.

Introduction

Grip test measures the maximum isotonic strength of hand and forearm and is often used as an indicator of general muscle strength. Muscle has been shown to exert positive effects on bone health, and studies are needed to test whether grip strength can be associated with bone mineral density of nonadjacent bones. The aim of this study is to assess whether grip strength is an independent predictor for bone mineral density (BMD) of femoral neck and total lumbar spine in the general US population.

Methods

We used the data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013–2014, and 1850 participants aged from 40 to 80 years old were included in the analysis. Grip strength was recorded as the largest reading of three efforts of one’s dominant hand using a handgrip dynamometer. Femoral neck and lumbar spine BMDs were measured through Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were done to examine the association between grip strength and BMDs.

Results

After adjusting for age, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), use of female hormones, smoking habit, drinking habit, family history of osteoporosis, use of calcium and vitamin D supplements, physical activity, serum calcium, and phosphorus levels, grip strength is associated with increased femoral neck and total lumbar spine BMDs in men (P < 0.001, P = 0.005), premenopausal women (P = 0.040, P = 0.014), and postmenopausal women (P = 0.016, P = 0.012).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that (1) grip strength can be associated with BMD of nonadjacent bones, and (2) grip strength of dominant hand can be an indicator of BMD in the general US population across genders and menopausal status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright NC, Saag KG, Dawson-Hughes B, Khosla S, Siris ES (2017) The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the USA. Osteoporos Int 28(4):1225–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Melton LJ 3rd et al (1992) Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 7(9):1005–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Stone K, Fox KM, Ensrud KE, Cauley J, Black D, Vogt TM (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of osteoporotic fractures research group. N Engl J Med 332(12):767–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho-Pham LT, Nguyen UD, Nguyen TV (2014) Association between lean mass, fat mass, and bone mineral density: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(1):30–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo B, Zhang ZK, Liang C, Li J, Liu J, Lu A, Zhang BT, Zhang G (2017) Molecular communication from skeletal muscle to bone: a review for muscle-derived myokines regulating bone metabolism. Calcif Tissue Int 100(2):184–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Colaianni G, Mongelli T, Colucci S, Cinti S, Grano M (2016) Crosstalk between muscle and bone via the muscle-myokine irisin. Curr Osteoporos Rep 14(4):132–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Norman K et al (2011) Hand grip strength: outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clin Nutr 30(2):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bohannon RW (2015) Muscle strength: clinical and prognostic value of hand-grip dynamometry. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 18(5):465–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bevier WC, Wiswell RA, Pyka G, Kozak KC, Newhall KM, Marcus R (1989) Relationship of body composition, muscle strength, and aerobic capacity to bone mineral density in older men and women. J Bone Miner Res 4(3):421–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson NK, Price RI, Cole JH, Gutteridge DH, Bhagat CI (1995) Bone density in young women is associated with body weight and muscle strength but not dietary intakes. J Bone Miner Res 10(3):384–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thorsen K, Nordström P, Lorentzon R, Dahlén GH (1999) The relation between bone mineral density, insulin-like growth factor I, lipoprotein (a), body composition, and muscle strength in adolescent males. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84(9):3025–3029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blain H, Vuillemin A, Teissier A, Hanesse B, Guillemin F, Jeandel C (2001) Influence of muscle strength and body weight and composition on regional bone mineral density in healthy women aged 60 years and over. Gerontology 47(4):207–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerdhem P, Ringsberg KA, Akesson K, Obrant KJ (2003) Influence of muscle strength, physical activity and weight on bone mass in a population-based sample of 1004 elderly women. Osteoporos Int 14(9):768–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ribom E, Ljunggren O, Piehl-Aulin K, Ljunghall S, Bratteby LE, Samuelson G, Mallmin H (2004) Muscle strength correlates with total body bone mineral density in young women but not in men. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14(1):24–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pang MY, Eng JJ (2005) Muscle strength is a determinant of bone mineral content in the hemiparetic upper extremity: implications for stroke rehabilitation. Bone 37(1):103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang MT, Bassin S, Dutto D, Braun W, Wong N, Pontello AM, Cooper DM, Arnaud SB (2007) Bone mineral density and leg muscle strength in young Caucasian, Hispanic, and Asian women. J Clin Densitom 10(2):157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rikkonen T, Sirola J, Salovaara K, Tuppurainen M, Jurvelin JS, Honkanen R, Kröger H (2012) Muscle strength and body composition are clinical indicators of osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 91(2):131–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsui Y, Takemura M, Harada A, Ando F, Shimokata H (2014) Effects of knee extensor muscle strength on the incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis after 6 years. J Bone Miner Metab 32(5):550–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahedi H, Aitken D, Scott D, Blizzard L, Cicuttini F, Jones G (2014) The association between hip muscle cross-sectional area, muscle strength, and bone mineral density. Calcif Tissue Int 95(1):64–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pasco JA et al (2015) Muscle strength and areal bone mineral density at the hip in women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sirola J et al (2008) Grip strength may facilitate fracture prediction in perimenopausal women with normal BMD: a 15-year population-based study. Calcif Tissue Int 83(2):93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaya A, Ozgocmen S, Ardicoglu O, Kamanli A, Gudul H (2005) Relationship between grip strength and hand bone mineral density in healthy adults. Arch Med Res 36(5):603–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Osei-Hyiaman D et al (1999) Influence of grip strength on metacarpal bone mineral density in postmenopausal Japanese women: a cross-sectional study. Calcif Tissue Int 64(3):263–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan DC, Lee WT, Lo DH, Leung JC, Kwok AW, Leung PC (2008) Relationship between grip strength and bone mineral density in healthy Hong Kong adolescents. Osteoporos Int 19(10):1485–1495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nasri R, Hassen Zrour S, Rebai H, Fadhel Najjar M, Neffeti F, Bergaoui N, Mejdoub H, Tabka Z (2013) Grip strength is a predictor of bone mineral density among adolescent combat sport athletes. J Clin Densitom 16(1):92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aydin G, Atalar E, Keleş I, Tosun A, Zöğ G, Keleş H, Orkun S (2006) Predictive value of grip strength for bone mineral density in males: site specific or systemic? Rheumatol Int 27(2):125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dixon WG, Lunt M, Pye SR, Reeve J, Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, O'Neill TW, European Prospective Osteoporosis Study Group (2005) Low grip strength is associated with bone mineral density and vertebral fracture in women. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44(5):642–646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E (1994) Grip strength and bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res 9(1):45–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lau EM et al (1993) Low bone mineral density, grip strength and skinfold thickness are important risk factors for hip fracture in Hong Kong Chinese. Osteoporos Int 3(2):66–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S3–S7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Taaffe DR, Cauley JA, Danielson M, Nevitt MC, Lang TF, Bauer DC, Harris TB (2001) Race and sex effects on the association between muscle strength, soft tissue, and bone mineral density in healthy elders: the health, aging, and body composition study. J Bone Miner Res 16(7):1343–1352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sahin G, Duce MN, Milcan A, Bagis S, Cimen OB, Cimen B, Erdogan C (2002) Bone mineral density and grip strength in postmenopausal Turkish women with osteoporosis: site specific or systemic? Int J Fertil Womens Med 47(5):236–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fujita K, Kaburagi H, Nimura A, Miyamoto T, Wakabayashi Y, Seki Y, Aoyama H, Shimura H, Kato R, Okawa A (2019) Lower grip strength and dynamic body balance in women with distal radial fractures. Osteoporos Int 30(5):949–956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Naka H, Iki M, Morita A, Ikeda Y (2005) Effects of pubertal development, height, weight, and grip strength on the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip in peripubertal Japanese children: Kyoto kids increase density in the skeleton study (Kyoto KIDS study). J Bone Miner Metab 23(6):463–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sirola J et al (2005) Associations between grip strength change and axial postmenopausal bone loss--a 10-year population-based follow-up study. Osteoporos Int 16(12):1841–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Foley KT et al (1999) Maximum grip strength is not related to bone mineral density of the proximal femur in older adults. Calcif Tissue Int 64(4):291–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Goodman CA, Hornberger TA, Robling AG (2015) Bone and skeletal muscle: key players in mechanotransduction and potential overlapping mechanisms. Bone 80:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pedersen BK, Febbraio MA (2012) Muscles, exercise and obesity: skeletal muscle as a secretory organ. Nat Rev Endocrinol 8(8):457–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaji H (2016) Effects of myokines on bone. Bonekey Rep 5:826

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miao He.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 270 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 46 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Y., Jiang, K. & He, M. Association between grip strength and bone mineral density in general US population of NHANES 2013–2014. Arch Osteoporos 15, 47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00719-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00719-2

Keywords

Navigation