Abstract
Natural durability of two plantation woods, Chinese fir and I-214 poplar, was investigated thoroughly by three testing methods, namely an accelerated laboratory decay test, a fungus cellar test and a field test. After the decay test using Postia placenta and Trametes versicolor, Chinese fir and the I-214 poplar showed 34% and 69% of mass loss, respectively, indicating they should be classified as slightly durable and non-durable wood. This conclusion was confirmed by the fungus cellar test and the field test. Like the performance in the decay test, I-214 poplar showed no resistance to termites either in the laboratory or in the field, whereas Chinese fir would be classified as moderately resistant.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheng J Q, Ding F, Wang K. 1981. Wood Science. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House
Jiang X M, Yin Y F, Urakami H. 2003. Variation within trees of wood anatomical properties in Chinese fir plantation and their relationship modeling equations. Chinese Forestry Science & Technology. 2(2): 1–11
Lu J X, Ye K L, Shimizu K. 2001. Studies on Chinese plantation timber. Proceedings of 112 Congress of Japanese Forestry Society. Gifu, Japan. 400–401
Yamamoto K, Momohara I, Ohmura W. 2001. Evaluation methods for the natural durability of timber species. In: High-Performance Utilization of Wood for Outdoor Uses (Imamura Y ed). Kyoto: Press-Net. 105–111
Zhou Y D, Li X L. 2004. Drying characteristics and drying schedule for plantation grown poplar and Chinese fir lumber. China Wood Industry. 18(3): 4–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
[Supported by Sino-Japanese Technical Cooperation Project Titled “Studies on Chinese Plantation Wood” (JICA PROJECT/033-1418-E-O)]
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xing, Jq., Ikuo, M. & Wakako, O. Natural resistance of two plantation woods Populus × canadensis cv. and Cunninghamia lanceolata to decay fungi and termites. For. Stud. China 7, 36–39 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-005-0055-3
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-005-0055-3