Abstract
The importance of in vitro tools to complement other ex situ methods for saving plants from extinction is more relevant than ever before. More than 50% of the world’s plant species are endemic to the 34 global biodiversity hotspots (GBHs), each holding at least 1,500 endemic plant species. In addition, a large number of small islands hold a number of endemic species on the brink of extinction. Conservation support concentrating more on these hotspots and small islands would significantly reduce the loss of species that is currently occurring. In the majority of these cases, the resources are either locally scarce or difficult to access for in vitro conservation to support other ex situ measures. Most island countries are small, and their geographical position is a stumbling block to initiate active partnerships with other countries when they need to use in vitro tools to rescue plants that produce recalcitrant seeds/spores or propagate only by vegetative means. However, many biodiversity hotspot countries have facilities and expertise, and they concentrate on their own flora for in vitro conservation programmes. For decades, because of the grave threat these plants face, the Conservation Biotechnology Unit, previously known as the Micropropagation Unit, at Royal Botanic Gardens Kew (RBG Kew) has been at the forefront of assisting countries to save their valuable biodiversity through both in situ and ex situ methods. Approaches mentioned here highlight work on recalcitrant ferns from GBHs and small islands. Source materials from recalcitrant species, either spore or seed and in some cases vegetative material, need to be used immediately after collection for tangible results in vitro. This becomes more difficult when only a few plants or small populations are left in the wild. The task becomes harder when available material is small in quantity, and there is greater restriction on the use of available genetic diversity in the wild. This paper highlights the importance of proper collection measures, in vitro culture procedures and cryopreservation and methods for the integrated conservation of threatened ferns from both GBHs and small islands. The importance of international networking to achieve these conservation goals also will be discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aragon C. F.; Pangua E. Spore viability under different storage conditions in four rupicolous Asplenium L. taxa. Am Fern J 94: 28–38; 2004.
Ballesteros D.; Walters C. Water properties in fern spores: sorption characteristics relating to water affinity, glassy states, and storage stability. J Exp Bot 58: 1185–1196; 2007.
Baninasab B. Amelioration of chilling stress by paclobutrazol in watermelon seedlings. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 121: 144–148; 2009.
Beri A.; Bir S. S. Germination of stored spores of Pteris vittata L. Am Fern J 83: 73–78; 1993.
Cha-Cha R.; Fernandes F.; Romano A. In vitro spore germination of Polystichum depranum, a threatened fern from Madeira Island. J Hort Sci & Biotech 80: 741–745; 2005.
Duckett J. G.; Burch J.; Fletcher P. W.; Matcham H. W.; Read D. J.; Russell A. J.; Pressel S. In vitro cultivation of bryophytes: a review of practicalities, problems, progress and promise. J Bryol 26: 3–20; 2004.
Engelmann F. Plant cryopreservation: Progress and prospects. In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl 40: 427–433; 2004.
Fabre J.; Dereuddre J. Encapsulation Dehydration - a new approach to cryopreservation of Solanum shoot-tips. Cryo Lett 11: 413–426; 1990.
Goller K.; Rybczynski J. J. Gametophyte and sporophyte of tree ferns in vitro culture. Acta Soc Bot Pol 76: 193–199; 2007.
Gray A. (2003) Pteris adscensionis, In: IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.1. <www.iucnredlist.org> Downloaded on 17 March 2010.
Hoagland D. R.; Arnon D. I. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Univ Calif Coll Agric Exp Sta Circ Berkley, CA: 347-353; 1938.
IUCN. IUCN Red List Categories. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland; 1994.
Lloyd R. M.; Klekowski Jr. E. J. Spore germination and viability in Pteridophyta: Evolutionary significance of chlorophyllous spores. Biotropica 2: 129–137; 1970.
Mesipuu M.; Shefferson R. P.; Kull T. Weather and herbivores influence fertility in the endangered fern Botrychium multifidum (SG Gmel.) Rupr. Plant Ecol 203: 23–31; 2009.
Mikula A.; Jata K.; Rybczynski J. J. Cryopreservation Strategies for Cyathea australis (R. Br.) Domin. Cryo Lett 30: 429–439; 2009.
Murashige T.; Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497; 1962.
Myers N.; Mittermeier R. A.; Mittermeier C. G.; da Fonseca G. A. B.; Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858; 2000.
Niedz R. P.; Bausher M. G. Control of in vitro contamination of explants from greenhouse- and field-grown trees. In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl 38: 468–471; 2002.
Parkinson M.; Prendergast M.; Sayegh A. J. Sterilisation of explants and cultures with sodium dichloroisocyanurate. Plant Growth Regul 20: 61–66; 1996.
Pence V. C. Cryopreservation of in vitro grown fern gametophytes. Am Fern J 90: 16–23; 2000a.
Pence V. C. Survival of chlorophyllous and nonchlorophyllous fern spores through exposure to liquid nitrogen. Am Fern J 90: 119–126; 2000b.
Pence V. C. In vitro collecting (IVC). I. The effect of collecting method and antimicrobial agents on contamination in temperate and tropical collections. In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl 41: 324–332; 2005.
Pence V. C. Cryopreservation of Bryophytes and Ferns. In: Reed B. M. (ed) Plant Cryopreservation: A Practical Guide. Springer, New York, pp 117–140; 2008.
Quintanilla L. G.; Amigo J.; Pangua E.; Pajaron S. Effect of storage method on spore viability in five globally threatened fern species. Ann Bot-London 90: 461–467; 2002.
Riviere J. N.; Hivert J.; Schmitt L.; Derroire G.; Sarrailh J. M.; Baret S. Role of tree ferns in flowering plant settlement in the tropical montane rainforests of La Reunion (Mascarene Archipelago, Indian Ocean). Rev Ecol-Terre Vie 63: 199–207; 2008.
Rogge G. D.; Viana A. M.; Randi A. M. Cryopreservation of spores of Dicksonia sellowiana: An endangered tree fern indigenous to South and Central America. Cryo Lett 21: 223–230; 2000.
Rowntree J. K. Development of novel methods for the initiation of in vitro bryophyte cultures for conservation. Plant Cell Tiss Org. Cult. 87: 191–201; 2006.
Rowntree J. K.; Duckett J. G.; Mortimer C. L.; Ramsay M. M.; Pressel S. Formation of specialized propagules resistant to desiccation and cryopreservation in the threatened moss Ditrichum plumbicola (Ditrichales, Bryopsida). Ann Bot-London 100: 483–496; 2007.
Sarasan V.; Cripps R.; Ramsay M. M.; Atherton C.; McMichen M.; Prendergast G. Rowntree JK Conservation in vitro of threatened plants - Progress in the past decade. In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl 42: 206–214; 2006.
Simabukuro E. A.; Dyer A. F.; Felippe G. M. The effect of sterilization and storage conditions on the viability of the spores of Cyathea delgadii. Am Fern J 88: 72–80; 1998.
Srivastava R.; Srivastava J.; Behera S. K.; Khare P. B. In vitro studies on development of gametophyte, sex-ontogeny and reproductive biology of a threatened fern, Microsorium punctatum (L.) Copel. Indian. J Biotechnol 7: 266–269; 2008.
Ye Q.; Pan L.; Kang M.; Huang H.; Leadlay E. (2007) Propagation of endangered fern Adiantum reniforme var. sinense for conservation. Building a sustainable future: the role of botanic gardens. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Global Botanic Gardens Congress, Wuhan, China.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the UKOT Programme Team at RBG Kew for the information and support regarding the UKOT ferns and Stedson Stroud (Ascension Island Government Conservation Office) for providing UKOT fern spores.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor: P. Lakshmanan
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnicoat, H., Cripps, R., Kendon, J. et al. Conservation in vitro of rare and threatened ferns—case studies of biodiversity hotspot and island species. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 47, 37–45 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-010-9303-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-010-9303-x