Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characteristics and Long-Term Follow-Up of Participants with Peripheral Arterial Disease During ALLHAT

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Capsule Commentary to this article was published on 05 August 2014

ABSTRACT

Background

Hypertension is a major risk factor for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Little is known about relative efficacy of antihypertensive treatments for preventing PAD.

Objectives

To compare, by randomized treatment groups, hospitalized or revascularized PAD rates and subsequent morbidity and mortality among participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lower Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

Design

Randomized, double-blind, active-control trial in high-risk hypertensive participants.

Participants

Eight hundred thirty participants with specified secondary outcome of lower extremity PAD events during the randomized phase of ALLHAT.

Interventions/events

In-trial PAD events were reported during ALLHAT (1994–2002). Post-trial mortality data through 2006 were obtained from administrative databases. Mean follow-up was 8.8 years.

Main Measures

Baseline characteristics and intermediate outcomes in three treatment groups, using the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate cumulative event rates and post-PAD mortality rates, Cox proportional hazards regression model for hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals, and multivariate Cox regression models to examine risk differences among treatment groups.

Key Results

Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, neither participants assigned to the calcium-channel antagonist amlodipine nor to the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril showed a difference in risk of clinically advanced PAD compared with those in the chlorthalidone arm (HR, 0.86; 95 % CI, 0.72–1.03 and HR, 0.98; 95 % CI, 0.83–1.17, respectively). Of the 830 participants with in-trial PAD events, 63 % died compared to 34 % of those without PAD; there were no significant treatment group differences for subsequent nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularizations, strokes, heart failure, or mortality.

Conclusions

Neither amlodipine nor lisinopril showed superiority over chlorthalidone in reducing clinically advanced PAD risk. These findings reinforce the compelling need for comparative outcome trials examining treatment of PAD in high-risk hypertensive patients. Once PAD develops, cardiovascular event and mortality risk is high, regardless of type of antihypertensive treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Murabito JM, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Wilson WF. Intermittent claudication. A risk profile from the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1997;96:44–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2000. Circulation. 2004;110:738–743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bozkurt AK, Tasci I, Tabak O, Gumus M, Kaplan Y. Peripheral artery disease assessed by ankle-brachial index in patients with established cardiovascular disease or at least one risk factor for atherothrombosis–CAREFUL study: a national, multi-center, cross-sectional observational study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;11:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Meijer WT, Grobbee DE, Hunink MGM, Hofman A, Hoes AW. Determinants of peripheral arterial disease in the elderly: the Rotterdam study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2934–2938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Criqui MH, Denenberg JO. The generalized nature of atherosclerosis: how peripheral arterial disease may predict adverse events from coronary artery disease. Vasc Med. 1998;3:241–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirsch AT, Hartman L, Town RJ, Virnig BA. National health care costs of peripheral arterial disease in the Medicare population. Vasc Med. 2008;13:209–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Antonopoulos S, Kokkoris S, Stasini F, et al. High prevalence of subclinical peripheral artery disease in Greek hospitalized patients. Eur J Intern Med. 2005;16:187–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cacoub PP, Abola MT, Baumgartner I, et al. REACH Registry Investigators. Cardiovascular risk factor control and outcomes in peripheral artery disease patients in the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204:e86–e92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Clement DL, De Buyzere ML, Duprez DA. Hypertension in peripheral arterial disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10:3615–3620.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Buyzere ML, Clement DL. Management of hypertension in peripheral arterial disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;50:238–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singer DR, Kite A. Management of hypertension in peripheral arterial disease: does the choice of drugs matter? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35:701–708.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lauer MS. Comparative effectiveness research: the view from the NHLBI. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1084–1086.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Matchar DB, McCrory DC, Orlando LA, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:16–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sciarretta S, Palano F, Tocci G, Baldini R, Volpe M. Antihypertensive treatment and development of heart failure in hypertension: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of studies in patients with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:384–394.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive And Lipid-Lowering Treatment To Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002;288:2981–2997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cushman WC, Davis BR, Pressel SL, ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group, et al. Mortality and morbidity during and after the Antihypertensive And Lipid-Lowering Treatment To Prevent Heart Attack Trial. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012;14:20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. The fifth report of the Joint National Committee On Detection. Evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure (JNC V). Arch Int Med. 1993;153:154–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Davis BR, Cutler JA, Gordon DJ, et al. Rationale and design for the Antihypertensive And Lipid-Lowering Treatment To Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:342–360.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial Collaborative Research Group. Diuretic versus alpha-blocker as first-step antihypertensive therapy: final results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Hypertension. 2003;42:239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial Protocol. Available at: https://allhat.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Forms/protocol.pdf. Accessed April 28, 2014

  22. Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Regression. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stafylas PC, Sarafidis PA. Carvedilol in hypertension treatment. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4:23–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Espinola-Klein C, Weisser G, Jagodzinski A, et al. ß-Blockers in patients with intermittent claudication and arterial hypertension: results from the nebivolol or metoprolol in arterial occlusive disease trial. Hypertension. 2011;58:148–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bavry AA, Anderson RD, Gong Y, et al. Outcomes among hypertensive patients with concomitant peripheral and coronary artery disease: findings from the INternational VErapamil-SR/Trandolapril STudy. Hypertension. 2010;55:48–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirsch AT, Duprez D. The potential role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Med. 2003;8:273–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Coppola G, Romano G, Corrado E, Grisanti RM, Novo S. Peripheral artery disease: potential role of ACE-inhibitor therapy. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4:1179–1187.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ostergren J, Sleight P, Dagenais G, et al. HOPE study investigators. Impact of ramipril in patients with evidence of clinical or subclinical peripheral arterial disease. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:17–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahimastos AA, Lawler A, Reid CM, Blombery PA, Kingwell BA. Brief communication: ramipril markedly improves walking ability in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:660–664.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gey DC, Lesho EP, Manngold J. Management of peripheral arterial disease. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69:525–532.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, American Association for Vascular Surgery, Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Society for Vascular Nursing, TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus, Vascular Disease Foundation, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1239–1312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gregg EW, Sorlie P, Paulose-Ram R, Gu Q, Eberhardt MS, Wolz M, Burt V, Curtin L, Engelgau M, Geiss L. 1999–2000 National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey. Prevalence of lower-extremity disease in the US adult population >=40 years of age with and without diabetes: 1999–2000 National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1591–1597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Extension Protocol: Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. Available at: https://allhat.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Forms/ExtensionProtocol.pdf. Accessed April 28, 2014

  34. Cimminiello C, Borghi C, Kownator S, PANDORA Study Investigators, et al. Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in patients at non-high cardiovascular risk Rationale and design of the PANDORA study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010;10:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Dawson DL, Hiatt WR, Creager MA, Hirsch AT. Peripheral arterial disease: medical care and prevention of complications. Prev Cardiol. 2002;5:119–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Dr. Ellen Breckenridge, The University of Texas School of Public Health, for editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by contracts NO1-HC-35130 and HHSN268201100036C from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The ALLHAT investigators acknowledge contributions of study medications supplied by Pfizer, Inc. (amlodipine and doxazosin), AstraZeneca (atenolol and lisinopril), and Bristol-Myers Squibb (pravastatin) and financial support provided by Pfizer, Inc.

Prior Presentations

None

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Basil has received honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo and Takeda.

Dr. Probstfield has received research support from GlaxcoSmithKline and Sanofi Aventis.

Dr. Rahman has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim.

Drs. Baraniuk, Dart, Davis, Ellsworth, Fendley, Habib, Piller, Simpson, and Whelton have no financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda B. Piller MD, MPH.

Additional information

Clinical Trial Registration

www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00000542

For a complete list of members of the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group, see JAMA 2002;288:2981–2997.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 533 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piller, L.B., Simpson, L.M., Baraniuk, S. et al. Characteristics and Long-Term Follow-Up of Participants with Peripheral Arterial Disease During ALLHAT. J GEN INTERN MED 29, 1475–1483 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2947-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2947-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation