Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in radiological imaging frequencies in children before and after the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant has raised concerns about radiation exposure, including medical radiation exposure such as X-ray and CT, in residents of Fukushima.

Materials and methods

We compared the numbers and the ratio of outpatients less than 10 years old who underwent imaging examinations [e.g., CT, X-ray, MRI, ultrasonography (US), etc.] at Fukushima Medical University hospital in Fukushima, Japan before (April 1, 2008–March 31, 2011) and after (April 1, 2011–March 31, 2014) the accident.

Results

The number of outpatients less than 10 years old decreased after the accident. The number of outpatients less than 10 years old who underwent CT and X-ray examinations also significantly decreased after the accident (p < 0.001, p < 0.01, respectively).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the number of pediatric radiological examinations decreased after the accident in Fukushima. We should continue to communicate with patients and their families to ensure that they understand the risks and benefits of radiological imaging in order to overcome their concerns about the nuclear disaster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Howe NL, McHugh K, Kim KP, Lee C, et al. CT scans in young people in Great Britain: temporal and descriptive patterns, 1993–2002. Radiol Res Pract. 2012; 594278.

  2. Mettler FA Jr, Thomadsen BR, Bhargavan M, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Lipoti JA, et al. Medical radiation exposure in the US in 2006: preliminary results. Health Phys. 2008;95(5):502–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, et al. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2400–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berrington de González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004;363:345–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2007;169:2071–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body screening. Radiology. 2004;232:735–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from paediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 report to the General Assembly. United Nations. 2010.

  11. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:499–505.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013;346:f2360.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg LI, et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(8):700–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Journy N, Ancelet S, Rehel JL, Mezzarobba M, Aubert B, Laurier D, et al. Predicted cancer risks induced by computed tomography examinations during childhood, by a quanitative risk assessment approach. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2014;53:39–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hammer GP, Seidenbusch MC, Schneider K, Regulla DF, Zeeb H, Spix C, et al. A cohort study of childhood cancer incidence after postnatal diagnostic X-ray exposure. Radiat Res. 2009;171(4):504–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters of Japanese Government. Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety. The Accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations. Available: http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/fukushima/japan-report/. Accessed 4 Jan 2015.

  17. Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters of Japanese Government. Additional Report of the Japanese Government to the IAEA—The Accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations (second report). Available: http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/fukushima/japan-report. Accessed 4 Jan 2015.

  18. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). UNSCEAR 2013 Report Volume I. Report to the General Assembly Scientific Annex A: levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East-Japan earthquake and tsunami. Available: http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2013/13-85418_Report_2013_Annex_A.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2015.

  19. Yabe H, Suzuki Y, Mashiko H, Nakayama Y, Hisata M, Niwa S, et al. Psychological distress after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident: results of a mental health and lifestyle survey through the Fukushima Health Management Survey in FY2011 and FY2012. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2014;60(1):57–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fukushima Prefecture. Report of age (5 years old rank) distinction population by estimate (in Japanese). http://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp.e.od.hp.transer.com/sec/11045b/15859.html. Accessed 28 Apr 2015.

  21. Miyazaki O. Has pediatric CT practice in Japan changed since the Fukushima nuclear disaster? Pediatr Radiol. 2015;1–4.

  22. Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D, Taylor GA. Has pediatric CT at children’s hospitals reached its peak? AJR. 2010;194:1194–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krille L, Dreger S, Schindel R, Albrecht T, Asmussen M, Barkhansen J, et al. Risk of cancer incidence before the age of 15 years after exposure to ionizing radiation from computed tomography: results from a German cohort study. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2015;54:1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang WY, Muo CH, Lin CY, Jen YM, Yang MH, Lin JC, et al. Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: a nation-wide population-based cohort study. BJC. 2014;110:2354–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagataki S, Takamura N, Kamiya K, Akashi M. Measurements of individual radiation doses in residents living around the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. Rad Res. 2013;180(5):439–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagataki S, Takamura N. A review of the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident: radiation effects on the thyroid and strategies for prevention. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014;21(5):384–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yasumura S, Hosoya M, Yamashita S, Kamiya K, Abe M, Akashi M, et al. Study protocol for the Fukushima health management survey. J Epidemio. 2012;22(5):375–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Agenda of the 17th reviewing board meeting of Fukushima Prefectural Health Survey on February 4, 2014 (in Japanese). Available: https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/sec/21045b/kenkocyosa-kentoiinkai-17-siryo.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2015.

  29. Press Release of Nuclear Safety Commission on March 23, 2011 (in Japanese). Available: http://www.nsr.go.jp/archive/nsc/info/110323_top_siryo.pdf#search=%27%E5%8E%9F%E5%AD%90%E5%8A%9B%E5%A7%94%E5%93%A1%E4%BC%9A+2011%E5%B9%B43%E6%9C%8823%E6%97%A5%27 Accessed 4 Jan 2015.

  30. Orita M, Hayashida N, Urata H, Shinkawa T, Endo Y, Takamura N. Determinants of the return to hometowns after the accident at Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant: a case study for the village of Kawauchi. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2013;156(3):383–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noboru Takamura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshida, K., Hayashida, N., Fukushima, Y. et al. Changes in radiological imaging frequencies in children before and after the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Jpn J Radiol 33, 619–626 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0464-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0464-8

Keywords

Navigation