Abstract
Purpose
To clarify the frequency and distribution pattern of calcifications in all and in only non-assessable coronary arterial segments in symptomatic patients with coronary heart disease.
Materials and methods
Among 2355 consecutive coronary CT angiographies performed using a 320-row ADCT, 1129 studies performed by prospective one-beat scanning without metallic and motion artifacts were evaluated. Frequency and degree of calcification were assessed for each coronary segment. Evaluations were performed in all and in only non-assessable segments, and the results were compared.
Results
Calcified segments were observed in 15.6 % of patients and 2.4 % of segments. The most extensively calcified segments were those in the proximal left anterior descending branch. 1.1 % of all of the segments were not assessable due to calcification, and 90 % of those non-assessable segments had high-grade calcifications. When the calcium score value was 1000 or 2000, the expected frequency of non-assessable segments was 27.5 or 53.5 %, respectively.
Conclusion
There were specific features of the distribution of coronary arterial calcifications. It is important to be familiar with these features when deciding whether or not to perform subtraction CCTA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, Mark D, Min J, O’gara P, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1864–94.
Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, Schmid FT, Lieberknecht M, Schulze R, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA. 2005;293:2471–8.
Meng L, Cui L, Cheng Y, Wu X, Tang Y, Wang Y, Xu F. Effect of heart rate and coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of the dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10:347–54.
Burgstahler C, Reimann A, Drosch T, Heuschmid M, Brodoefel H, Tsiflikas I, et al. Cardiac dual-source computed tomography in patients with severe coronary calcifications and a high prevalence of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2007;1:143–51.
Palumbo AA, Maffei E, Martini C, Tarantini G, Di Tanna GL, Berti E, et al. Coronary calcium score as gatekeeper for 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain: per-segment and per-patient analysis. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2127–35.
Ahn SJ, Kang DK, Sun JS, Yoon MH. Accuracy and predictive value of coronary computed tomography angiography for the detection of obstructive coronary heart disease in patients with an Agatston calcium score above 400. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013;37(3):387–94.
Yoshioka K, Tanaka R. K Muranaka K. Subtraction coronary CT angiography for calcified lesions. Cardiol Clin. 2012;30:93–102.
Tanaka R, Yoshioka K. K Muranaka K, Improved evaluation of calcified segments on coronary CT angiography: a feasibility study of coronary calcium subtraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29:75–81.
Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr. Detrano R: quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–32.
Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51:5–40.
Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Cassells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient. a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation. 2003;108:1664–72.
Polonsky TS, McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, Bild DE, Burke GL, Guerci AD, Greenland P. Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction. JAMA. 2010;303:1610–6.
Rozanski A, Gransar H, Shaw LJ, Kim J, Miranda-Peats L, Wong ND, et al. Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1622–32.
Hecht HS, Budoff MJ, Berman DS, Ehrich J, Rumberger JA. Coronary artery calcium scanning: clinical paradigms for cardiac risk assessment and treatment. Am Heart J. 2006;15:1139–46.
Sosonowski M, Parma Z, Czekai A, Tendera M. Traditional risk factors and coronary artery calcium in young adults. Cardiolo J. 2012;19:402–7.
Hecht HS, Narula J. Coronary artery calcium scanning in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus: a paradigm shift. J Diabetes. 2012;4:342–50.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Amanuma, M., Kondo, T., Arai, T. et al. Segmental distributions of calcifications and non-assessable lesions on coronary computed tomographic angiography: evaluation in symptomatic patients. Jpn J Radiol 33, 122–130 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0389-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0389-2