Skip to main content
Log in

Age-related Patterns of Upper Arm Muscle and Fat Area in Turkish Children and Assessment of Nutritional Status

  • Published:
International Journal of Anthropology

Abstract

Anthropometric estimation of midarm muscularity and fatness was employed as a general index of nutritional status in developing countries. The present study attempts to evaluate the sex- and age-related pattern of regional muscle and fat area characteristics in Turkish children. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 1,068 10- to 14-year-old children (583 boys and 485 girls) from junior high schools in Ankara, the capital city of Turkey. According to general anthropometric protocols, weight, height, triceps skinfold thickness, and midarm circumference measurements were taken and socioeconomic data were collected. Arm muscle area (AMA) and arm fat area (AFA) were calculated and centile curves were evaluated using least median squares method. Results showed significant sexual dimorphism in muscle and fat patterning. AFA was found to be higher among girls and AMA among boys. The present findings suggest that the different levels of socioeconomic status (SES) appeared to be more prevalent on muscularity among boys (p < 0.05) and adiposity among girls (p < 0.001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Bogin B (1999) Patterns of human growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolzan A, Guimarey L, Frisancho AR (1999) Study of growth in rural school children from Buenos Aires, Argentina using upper arm muscle area by height and other anthropometric dimensions of body composition. Ann Hum Biol 26(2):185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boye KR, Dimitriou T, Manz F, Schoenau E, Neu C, Wudy S, Remer T (2002) Anthropometric assessment of muscularity during growth: estimating fat-free mass with 2 skinfold-thickness measurements is superior to measuring mid-upper arm muscle area in healthy prepubertal children. Am J Clin Nutr 76(3):628–632

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cole TJ, Green PJ (1992) Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med 10:1305–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cole TJ, Freeman JV, Preece MA (1998) British 1990 growth reference centiles for weight, height, body mass index and head circumference fitted by maximum penalized likelihood. Stat Med 17:407–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Derman O, Yalcin SS, Kanbur N, Kinik E (2002) The influence of the sexual stages of adolescent boys on the circumference of the arm. muscle area and skinfold measurements. Int J Adolesc Med Health 14(1):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duyar I (1990) 10 yas grubu cocukların antropometrik olculerinde eseysel ve sosyo-ekonomik konuma gore gorulen farklılıklar. Ankara Universitesi Dil ve Tarih-Cografya Fakultesi Dergisi 34:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  8. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2001) Nutrition country profiles. FAO, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frisancho AR (1974) Triceps skinfold and upper arm muscle size norms for assessment of nutritional status. Am J Clin Nutr 27:1052–1057

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frisancho AR (1981) New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status. Am J Clin Nutr 34:2540–2545

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frisancho AR (1990) Anthropometric standards for the assessment of growth and nutritional status. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbour

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gunay U, Sapan N, Salih C, Dogruyol H (1990) Determination of arm fat area and arm muscle area norms in children 6–12 years of age in Bursa. Turk J Pediatr 32(2):93–100

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HUIPS), Ministry of Health, State Planning Organization, and European Union (2004) 2003 Turkey demographic and Health Survey. HUIPS, Ankara

  14. Heymsfield SB, McManus C, Smith J, Stevens V, Nixon DW (1982) Anthropometric measurement of muscle mass: revised equations for calculating bone-free arm muscle area. Am J Clin Nutr 36:680–690

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim KB, French KE, Spurgeon JH (1999) Somatic comparisons at four ages of South Korean females and females of other Asian groups. Am J Hum Biol 11(6):735–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R (1988) Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Human Kinetics Books, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lukaski H (1997) Sarcopenia: assessment of muscle mass. J Nutr 127(5):994–997

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martine T, Claessens AL, Vlietinck R, Marchal G, Beunen G (1997) Accuracy of anthropometric estimation of muscle cross-sectional area of the arm in males. Am J Hum Biol 9:73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roche AF (1992) Growth, maturation and body composition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roche AF, Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG (1996) Human body composition. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ryan AS, Roche AF, Kuczmarski RJ (1996) Weight, stature, and body mass index data for Mexican Americans from the third national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III, 1988–1994). Am J Hum Biol 11(5):673–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saatcioglu A (1988) Growth standards for 7 to 11-year-old Turkish children. University of Kuopio, Kuopio

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weiner JES, Lourie JA (1969) Human biology: a guide to field methods. IBP handbook, no. 9. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are especially indebted to the principals of schools and children involved for their patient and friendly collaboration. We also thank the Physical Anthropology Laboratory members of Kyoto University for their constructive comments and anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the improvement of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timur Gültekin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gültekin, T., Özer, B.K., Katayama, K. et al. Age-related Patterns of Upper Arm Muscle and Fat Area in Turkish Children and Assessment of Nutritional Status. Intl Jnl Anthropology 21, 231–239 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11599-007-9025-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11599-007-9025-6

Keywords

Navigation