Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation Combined Versus Nerve Stimulation alone for Lumbar Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A nerve stimulation-guided lumbar plexus block is a well-established technique. It is not clear whether ultrasound guidance has additional value for this deep block technique. This study aimed to examine whether ultrasound guidance using a paramedian transverse scan through the intertransverse space (PMTS-ITS) approach in combination with nerve stimulation reduces the onset time of a complete sensory block. Forty-four patients who were scheduled to undergo arthroscopic knee surgery with an ultrasound visibility score (UVS) of ≥10 for the lumbar plexus were enrolled and randomly allocated to the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group (group U-N) or nerve stimulation group (group N) in this prospective, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled study. The primary outcome was the onset time of a complete sensory block. The results showed that the onset time of a complete sensory block to pinprick and cold was 10 (10–40) min and 10 (10–40) min in group U-N, respectively, and 30 (10–40) min and 20 (10–40) min in group N (P=0.005, P=0.004), respectively. The performance time was 658±87 s in group U-N and 528±97 s in group N (P<0.001). There was no (0%) patient who required 5 or more needle passes in group U-N and 6 (27.3%) in group N (P=0.028). The block failure rate was 9.1% in group U-N and 31.8% in group N (P>0.05). In conclusion, ultrasound guidance using the PMTS-ITS approach in combination with nerve stimulation led to a faster onset of a complete sensory block than nerve stimulation alone for a lumbar plexus block in patients with a UVS ≥10. Ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation significantly decreased the number of patients who required 5 or more needle passes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth, 2005,94(1):7–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu SS. Evidence basis for ultrasound-guided block characteristics onset, quality, and duration. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2016,41(2):205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neal JM, Brull R, Chan VW, et al. The asra evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and pain medicine: Executive summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2010,35(2): S1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Neal JM. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and patient safety: Update of an evidence-based analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2016,41(2):195–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Awad IT, Duggan EM. Posterior lumbar plexus block: Anatomy, approaches, and techniques. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2005,30(2):143–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirchmair L, Entner T, Wissel J, et al. A study of the paravertebral anatomy for ultrasound-guided posterior lumbar plexus block. Anesth Analg, 2001,93(4): 477–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karmakar MK, Ho AM, Li X, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block through the acoustic window of the lumbar ultrasound trident. Br J Anaesth, 2008,100(4): 533–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karmakar MK, Li JW, Kwok WH, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block using a transverse scan through the lumbar intertransverse space: A prospective case series. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2015,40(1): 75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sauter AR UK, Bendtsen TF, Borglum J. The ‘shamrock method’ a new and promising technique for ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block. Br J Anaesth, 2013 e-letter (http://www..bjaoxfordjournalsorg/forum/topic/brjana_el%3B9814)

  10. Karmakar MK, Li JW, Kwok WH, et al. Sonoanatomy relevant for lumbar plexus block in volunteers correlated with cross-sectional anatomic and magnetic resonance images. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2013,38(5): 391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karmakar MK, Li X, Ho AM, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: Evaluation of a novel in-plane technique. Br J Anaesth, 2009,102(6): 845–854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Doi K, Sakura S, Hara K. A modified posterior approach to lumbar plexus block using a transverse ultrasound image and an approach from the lateral border of the transducer. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2010,38(1):213–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein SM, Melton MS, Grill WM, et al. Peripheral nerve stimulation in regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2012,37(4): 383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Winnie AP RS, Durrani Z, Radonjic R. Plexus blocks for lower extremity surgery. Anesthesiol Rev, 1974,1(1):6

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marhofer P, Oismuller C, Faryniak B, et al. Three-in-one blocks with ropivacaine: Evaluation of sensory onset time and quality of sensory block. Anesth Analg, 2000,90(1): 125–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sites BD, Beach ML, Chinn CD, et al. A comparison of sensory and motor loss after a femoral nerve block conducted with ultrasound versus ultrasound and nerve stimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2009,34(5): 508–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bromage PR, Burfoot MF, Crowell DE, et al. Quality of epidural blockade. I. Influence of physical factors. Br J Anaesth, 1964,36(6):342–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu R, Shen C, Yang C, et al. Comparison of lumbar plexus block using the short axis in-plane method at the plane of the transverse process and at the articular process: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol, 2018,18:17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Andres J, Alonso-Inigo JM, Sala-Blanch X, et al. Nerve stimulation in regional anesthesia: Theory and practice. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2005, 19(2):153–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farny J, Drolet P, Girard M. Anatomy of the posterior approach to the lumbar plexus block. Can J Anaesth, 1994,41(6):480–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato M, Hara M, Uchida O. An antero-lateral approach to ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block in supine position combined with quadratus lumborum block using single-needle insertion for pediatric hip surgery. Paediatr Anaesth, 2017,27(6):1064–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Y, Ke X, Wu X, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block in supine position. Anesthesiology, 2018, 128(4):812

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong Liu or Wei Mei.

Additional information

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization or corporation or individual that can inappropriately influence this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, Jy., Fang, Y., Yu, Y. et al. Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation Combined Versus Nerve Stimulation alone for Lumbar Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial. CURR MED SCI 40, 1182–1190 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-020-2307-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-020-2307-9

Key words

Navigation