Abstract
A recurrent theme in the characterization of synthetic biology is the role of engineering. This theme is widespread in the accounts of scholars studying this field and the biologists working in it, in those of the biologists themselves, as well as in policy documents. The aim of this article is to open this black-box of engineering that is supposed to influence and change contemporary life sciences. Too often, both synthetic biologists and their critics assume a very narrow understanding of what engineering is about, resulting in an unfruitful debate about whether synthetic biology possesses genuine engineering methodologies or not. By looking in more detail to the diversity of engineering conceptions in debates concerning synthetic biology, a richer perspective can be developed. In this article, I will examine five influential ways in which engineering is understood in these debates, namely engineering as applied science, as rational methodology, context-sensitive practice, cunning activity or design. The claim is first of all thus to argue that engineering must not be seen as something stable or characterized by a fixed essence. It rather has multiple meanings and interpretations. Secondly, the claim is that most of the debates on synthetic biology cannot be indifferent towards the question which conception of engineering is at play, since the specific questions and concerns that pop up depend to a great extent on the precise conception of engineering one has in account. Many of the existing debates around synthetic biology can thus be reinterpreted and readdressed once one is aware of which conception of engineering is at play.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Synthetic biologists also rewrite the history of biology in light of the ideal of ‘engineering life’ [11].
References
Rabinow P, Bennett G (2012) Designing human practices: an experiment with synthetic biology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Roosth S (2017) Synthetic: how life got made. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Giese B, Koenigstein S, Wigger H, Schmidt J, Gleich A (2013) Rational engineering principles in synthetic biology: a framework for quantitative analysis and an initial assessment. Biol Theory 8(4):324–333
Endy D (2005) Foundations for engineering biology. Nature 438(7067):449–453
Endy D (2008) Synthetic biology: can we make biology easy to engineer? Ind Biotechnol 4(4):340–351
Andrianantoandro E, Basu S, Karig D, Weiss R (2006) Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline. Mol Syst Biol 2(1):1–14
Heinemann M, Panke S (2006) Synthetic biology—putting engineering into biology. Bioinformatics 22(22):2790–2799
Church G, Regis E (2012) Regenesis. How synthetic biology will reinvent nature and ourselves. Basic Books, New York
Képès F (2011) La biologie de synthèse: plus forte que la nature? Le Pommier, Paris
De Lorenzo V, Danchin A (2008) Synthetic biology: discovering new worlds and new words. EMBO Rep 9(9):822–827
Bensaude-Vincent B (2013) Discipline-building in synthetic biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44(2):122–129
European Commission (2005) Synthetic biology. Applying engineering to biology. Report of a NEST high‐level expert group EU 21796. Brussels.
UK synthetic biology roadmap (2012). https://connect.innovateuk.org/web/syntheticbiology-special-interest-group/roadmap-for-synthetic-biology Accessed on 1 October 2018
Boudry M, Pigliucci M (2013) The mismeasure of machine: synthetic biology and the trouble with engineering metaphors. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 44(4):660–668
Pauwels E (2013) Mind the metaphor. Nature 500(7464):523–524
O'Malley M (2009) Making knowledge in synthetic biology: design meets kludge. Biol Theory 4(4):378–389
Lewens T (2013) From bricolage to BioBricks™: synthetic biology and rational design. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 44(4):641–648
Frow E, Calvert J (2013) ‘Can simple biological systems be built from standardized interchangeable parts?’ Negotiating biology and engineering in a synthetic biology competition. Eng Stud 5(1):42–58
Schyfter P (2013) Propellers and promoters: emerging engineering knowledge in aeronautics and synthetic biology. Eng Stud 5(1):6–25
Schyfter P, Calvert J (2015) Intentions, expectations and institutions: engineering the future of synthetic biology in the USA and the UK. Sci Cult 24(4):1–25
Vincenti W (1990) What engineers know and how they know it. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Van de Poel I (2010) Philosophy and engineering: setting the stage. In: Van de Poel I, Goldberg DE (eds) Philosophy and engineering: an emerging agenda. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–11
Bunge M (1966) Technology as applied science. Technol Cult 7(3):329–347
Godin B (2006) The linear model of innovation: the historical construction of an analytical framework. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(6):639–667
SCENHR (2014) Opinion on synthetic biology I: definition. European Commission, Luxembourg
Carlson R (2011) Biology is technology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Pardee K (2018) Perspective: solidifying the impact of cell-free synthetic biology through lyophilisation. Biochem Eng J 138:91–97
Smith M, Wilding K, Hunt J, Bennett A, Bundy B (2014) The emerging age of cell-free synthetic biology. FEBS Lett 588:2755–2761
Harris D, Jewett M (2012) Cell-free biology: exploiting the interface between synthetic biology and synthetic chemistry. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:672–678
Hodgman C, Jewett M (2012) Cell-free synthetic biology: thinking outside of the cell. Metab Eng 14:261–269
Nirenberg M, Matthaei J (1961) The dependence of cell-free protein synthesis in E. coli upon naturally occurring or synthetic polyribonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 47:1588–1602
Katzen F, Chang G, Kudlicki W (2005) The past, present and future of cell-free protein synthesis. Trends Biotechnol 23(3):150–156
Carlson E, Gan R, Hodgman C, Jewett M (2012) Cell-free protein synthesis: applications come of age. Biotechnol Adv 30:1185–1194
Calvert J (2010) Synthetic biology: constructing nature? Sociol Rev 58:95–112
Calvert J (2008) The commodification of emergence: systems biology, synthetic biology and intellectual property. BioSocieties 3(4):383–398
Radder H (ed) (2010) The commodification of academic research: science and the modern university. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
Doudna J, Sternberg S (2017) A crack in creation: gene editing and the unthinkable power to control evolution. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Mitcham C (1994) Thinking through technology: the path between engineering and philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Calvert J (2006) What’s special about basic research? Sci Technol Hum Values 31(2):199–220
Schauz D (2014) What is basic research? Insights from historical semantics. Minerva 52(3):273–328
Gieryn T (1999) Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Chicago
Agapakis C, Silver P (2009) Synthetic biology: exploring and exploiting genetic modularity through the design of novel biological networks. Mol BioSyst 5(7):704–713
Elfick A, Endy D (2014) Synthetic biology: what it is and why it matters. In: Endy D, Elfick A, Schyfter P, Calvert J, Ginsberg AD (eds) Synthetic aesthetics: investigating synthetic biology's designs on nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 3–25
Bud R (1991) Biotechnology in the twentieth century. Soc Stud Sci 21(3):415–457
Boldt J (2013) Creating life: synthetic biology and ethics. In: Kaebnick G, Murray TH (eds) Synthetic biology and morality: artificial life and the bounds of nature. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 35–50
Boldt J, Müller O (2008) Newtons of the leaves of grass. Nat Biotechnol 26(4):387–389
Campos L (2009) That was the synthetic biology that was. In: Schmidt M, Kelle A, Ganguli-Mitra A, de Vriend H (eds) Synthetic biology: The technoscience and its consequences. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 5–21
Morange M (2012) Synthetic biology: a challenge to mechanical explanations in biology? Perspect Biol Med 55(4):543–553
Jacob F (1977) Evolution and tinkering. Science 196(4295):1161–1166
Morange M (2009) Synthetic biology: a bridge between functional and evolutionary biology. Biol Theory 4(4):368–377
Bensaude-Vincent B, Benoit-Browaeys D (2011) Fabriquer la vie: Où va la biologie de synthèse? Seuil, Paris
Calvert J (2013) Engineering biology and society: reflections on synthetic biology. Sci Technol Soc 18(3):405–420
Nordmann A (2015) Synthetic biology at the limits of science. In: Giese B, Pade C, Wigger H, von Gleich A (eds) Synthetic biology: character and impact. Springer, Cham, pp 31–58
Calcott B, Levy A, Siegal M, Soyer O, Wagner A (2015) Engineering and biology: counsel for a continued relationship. Biol Theory 10(1):50–59
Galison P (1997) Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Henderson K (1999) On line and on paper: visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Henderson K (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci Technol Hum Values 16(4):448–473
Cooley M (1980) Architect or bee? The human/technology relationship. South End Press, Boston
Rogers C (1983) The nature of engineering: a philosophy of technology. Macmillan, London
Houkes, W (2008) The nature of technological knowledge. In: Meijers, A (ed) (2008). Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 309–350
Layton E (1984) Science and engineering design. Ann N Y Acad Sci 424(1):173–181
Ryle G (1971) Knowing how and knowing that. In: Collected Papers (Volume 2). Barnes and Nobles, New York, pp 212–225
Polanyi M (1967) The tacit dimension. Doubleday, Garden City
Ferguson E (1992) Engineering and the mind’s eye. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Kuldell N, Bernstein R, Ingram K, Hart K (2015) BioBuilder: synthetic biology in the lab. O'Reilly, Sebastopol
Law J (1987) Technology and heterogeneous engineering: the case of Portuguese expansion. In: Bijker W, Hughes T, Pinch T (eds) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 111–134
Kogge W, Richter M (2013) Synthetic biology and its alternatives. Descartes, Kant and the idea of engineering biological machines. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 44:181–189
Auyang S (2004) Engineering: endless frontier. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Picon A (2004) Engineers and engineering history: problems and perspectives. Hist Technol 20(4):421–436
Vérin H (1993) La gloire des ingénieurs : L'intelligence technique du XVIe au XVIIIe siècle. Albin Michel, Paris
Flusser V (1999) The shape of things: a philosophy of design. Reaktion Books, London
Detienne M, Vernant JP (1978) Cunning intelligence in Greek culture and society. Harvester Press, Hassocks
Horkheimer M, Adorno TW (1972) Dialectic of enlightenment. Herder and Herder, New York
Keller E (2002) Making sense of life: explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Gibson D et al (2010) Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 329(5987):52–56
Pennisi E (2010) Genomics. Synthetic genome brings new life to bacterium. Science 328(5981):958–959
Bedau M, Church G, Rasmussen S, Caplan A, Benner S, Fussenegger M, Collins J, Deamer D (2010) Life after the synthetic cell. Nature 465(7297):422–424
Bryksin A, Brown A, Baksh M, Finn M, Barker T (2014) Learning from nature—novel synthetic biology approaches for biomaterial design. Acta Biomater 10(4):1761–1769
Venter C (2013) Life at the speed of light: from the double helix to the dawn of digital life. Viking, New York
Cambray G, Mutalik V, Arkin A (2011) Toward rational design of bacterial genomes. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:624–630
Marrguet P, Balagadde F, Tan C, You L (2007) Biology by design: reduction and synthesis of cellular components and behavior. J R Soc Interface 4:607–623
Delgado A, Porcar M (2013) Designing de novo: interdisciplinary debates in synthetic biology. Syst Synth Biol 7(1-2):41–50
Drubin D, Way J, Silver P (2007) Designing biological systems. Genes Dev 21:242–254
Deplazes A (2009) Piercing together a puzzle. EMBO Rep 10(5):428–432
Schmidt M, Ganguli-Mitra A, Torgersen H, Kelle A, Deplazes A, Biller-Andorno N (2009) A priority paper for the societal and ethical aspects of synthetic biology. Syst Synth Biol 3:3–7
Rabinow P (2009) Prosperity, amelioration, flourishing: from a logic of practical judgment to reconstruction. Law and Literature 21(3):301–320
Synthetic Biology Leadership Council (2016) Biodesign for the Bioeconomy. UK Synthetic Biology Strategic Plan 2016 https://static1squarespacecom/static/54a6bdb7e4b08424e69c93a1/t/589619873e00be743c62a76e/1486231951837/BioDesign+for+the+Bioeconomy+2016+-+DIGITALpdf. Accessed 1 October 2018
Galle P, Kroes P (2014) Science and design: identical twins? Des Stud 35(3):201–231
Ammon S (2017) Why designing is not experimenting: design methods, epistemic praxis and strategies of knowledge acquisition in architecture. Philosophy & Technology 30(4):495–520
Seely B (1993) Research, engineering, and science in American engineering colleges: 1900-1960. Technol Cult 34(2):344–386
Seely B (1999) The other re-engineering of engineering education, 1900–1965. J Eng Educ 88(3):285–294
Sheppard SD, Macatangay K, Colby A, Sullivan WM, Shulman LS (2009) Educating engineers: designing for the future of the field. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Lewin D (1979) On the place of design in engineering. Des Stud 1(2):113–117
Creed M (1990) On an educational philosophy towards civil engineering design. In: McCabe V (ed) Design in engineering education. SEFI, Brussels, pp 75–78
Cross N (2001) Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Des Issues 17(3):49–55
Simon H (1984) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner. Temple-Smith, London
Petroski H (1995) Design paradigms: case histories of error and judgment in engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Akera A, Seely B (2015) A historical survey of the structural changes in the American system of engineering education. In: Christensen S, Didier C, Jamison A, Meganck M, Mitcham C, Newberry B (eds) International perspectives on engineering education. Springer, Cham, pp 7–32
Williams R (2003) Retooling: a historian confronts technological change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Ijäs T (2018) Design under randomness: how variation affects the engineering of biological systems. Biol Theory 13(3):153–163
Wang H, Church G (2011) Multiplexed genome engineering and genotyping methods: applications for synthetic biology and metabolic engineering. Methods Enzymol 498:409–426
Raman S, Rogers JK, Taylor ND, Church G (2014) Evolution-guided optimization of biosynthetic pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(50):17803–17808
Rogers J, Church G (2016) Multiplexed engineering in biology. Trends Biotechnol 34(3):198–206
Carr P, Church G (2009) Genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol 27(12):1151–1162
Wang H, Isaacs FJ, Carr P, Sun Z, Xu G, Forest C, Church G (2009) Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature 460(7257):894–898
Fujimura J (2005) Postgenomic futures: translations across the machine-nature border in systems biology. New Genetics and Society 24(2):195–226
Green S (2017) Introduction to philosophy of systems biology. In: Green S (ed) Philosophy of systems biology: perspectives from scientists and philosophers. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–23
Acknowledgements
Previous versions of this paper have been presented at the “4èmes Journées sur l’Épistémologie Historique” in Paris (May, 2018) and at the doctoral seminar of the Centre for Metaphysics, Philosophy of Religion and Philosophy of Culture in Leuven (November, 2017). I thank the audiences of both seminars and the anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions and critiques.
Funding
This work was supported by the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simons, M. The Diversity of Engineering in Synthetic Biology. Nanoethics 14, 71–91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-019-00348-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-019-00348-1