Abstract
Objective
We present herein a novel algorithm for architectural distortion detection that utilizes the point convergence index with the likelihood of lines (e.g., spiculations) relating to architectural distortion.
Materials and methods
Validation was performed using 25 computed radiography (CR) mammograms, each of which has an architectural distortion with radiating spiculations. The proposed method comprises five steps. First, the lines were extracted on mammograms, such as spiculations of architectural distortion as well as lines in the mammary gland. Second, the likelihood of spiculation for each extracted line was calculated. In the third step, point convergence index weighted by this likelihood was evaluated at each pixel to enhance distortion only. Fourth, local maxima of the index were extracted as candidates for the distortion, then classified based on nine features in the last step.
Results
Point convergence index without the proposed likelihood generated 84.48/image false-positives (FPs) on average. Conversely, the proposed index succeeded in decreasing this number to 12.48/image on average when sensitivity was 100%. After the classification step, number of FPs was reduced to 0.80/image with 80.0% sensitivity.
Conclusion
Combination of the likelihood of lines with point convergence index is effective in extracting architectural distortion with radiating spiculations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AD:
-
Architectural distortion
- CAD:
-
Computer-assisted detection/diagnosis
- CR:
-
Computed radiography
References
Minami Y, Tsubono Y, Nishino Y, Ohuchi N, Shibuya D, Hisamichi S (2003) The increase of female breast cancer incidence in Japan: emergency of Birth cohort effect. Int J Cancer 108: 901–906
Erickson BJ, Bartholmai B (2002) Computer-aided detection and diagnosis at the start of the third millennium. J Digital Imaging 15: 59–68
American College of Radiology (1998) Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, VA
Burrell HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson ARM, Pinder SE, Evans AJ, Yeoman LJ, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Blamey RW, Robertson JFR (1996) Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognostic factors. Radiology 199: 811–817
Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, Soo MS (2003) Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. Am J Roentgenol 184: 1083–1088
Evans AJ, Pinder SE, James JJ, Ellis IO, Cornford E (2006) Is mammographic spiculation an independent, Good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer?. Am J Roentgenol 187: 1377–1380
Zwiggelaar R, Parr TC, Schumm JE, Hutt IW, Taylor CJ, Astlay SM, Boggis CRM (1999) Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms. Med Image Anal 3(1): 39–62
Kegelmeyer WP Jr, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper ML (1994) Computer-aided mammographic screening for speculated lesions. Radiology 191: 331–336
Mudigonda NR, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JEL (2001) Detection of breast masses in mammogram by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(12): 1215–1227
Sampat MP, Whitman GJ, Markey MK, Bovik AC (2005) Evidence based detection of spiculated masses and architectural distortions. SPIE 5747: 26–37
Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2004) Detection of architectural distortion in mammograms using phase portraits. SPIE 5370: 587–597
Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2007) Reduction of false positives in the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms by using a geometrically constrained phase portrait model. Int J CARS 1(6): 361–369
Ichikawa T, Matsubara T, Hara T, Fujita H, Endo T, Iwase T (2004) Automated detection method for architectural distortion areas on mammograms based on morphological processing and surface analysis. SPIE 5370: 920–925
Guo Q, Shao J, Ruiz V (2005) Investigation of support vector machine for the detection of architectural distortion in mammographic images. J Phys Conf Ser 15: 88–94
Tourassi GD, Delong DM, Floyd CE Jr (2006) A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms. Phys Med Biol 51(5): 1299–1312
Tateno T, Iinuma T, Takano M (1987) Computed radiography. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 25–30
Yamada S, Murase K (2005) Effectiveness of flexible noise control image processing for digital portal images using computed radiography. Br J Radiol 78(930): 519–527
Yamada M, Shimura K, Nagata T (2003) Selective pattern enhancement processing for digital mammography, algorithms, and the visual evaluation. Proc SPIE 5034: 328–336
Yoshinaga Y, Kobatake H (2000) The line detection method with robustness against contrast and width variation applied in gradient vector field. Syst Comp Japan 31(3): 49–58
Toriwaki J, Hasegawa J, Fukumura T (1976) Recognition of vessel shadows for automated measurements and classification System of Chest photofluorograms. In: Symposium on computer aided diagnosis of medical images, pp 1–8
Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber 9(1): 62–66
Hasegawa J, Tsutsui T, Toriwaki J (1991) Automated extraction of cancer lesions with convergent fold patterns in double contrast X-ray image of stomach. Syst Comp Japan 22(7): 51–62
Monga O, Benayoun S (1995) Using partial derivatives of 3D images to extract typical surface features. Comp Vis Image Understanding 61(2): 171–189
Thirion JP, Gourdon A (1995) Computing the differential characteristics of isointensity surface. Comp Vis Image Understanding 61(2): 190–202
Pudil P, Ferri FJ, Novovicova J, Kittler J (1994) Floating search methods for feature selection with nonmonotoniccriterion functions. In: IEEE Conf B, 12th IAPR, vol 2, pp 279–283
te Brake GM, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JHCL (2000) An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol 45: 2843–2857
Fukunaga K (1990) Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 219–221
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Radiology 143: 29–36
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148: 839–843
Fukunaga K (1990) Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 225–229
Nemoto M, Shimizu A, Kobatake H, Takeo H, Nawano S (2005) Classifier ensemble for mammography CAD system combining feature selection with ensemble learning. In: Proceedings of computer assisted radiology and surgery, pp 1047–1051
Viola P, Jones M (2001) Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of a simple feature. Proc IEEE Comp Soc Conf CVPR 2001: 511–518
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nemoto, M., Honmura, S., Shimizu, A. et al. A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows. Int J CARS 4, 27–36 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0267-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0267-9