Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We present herein a novel algorithm for architectural distortion detection that utilizes the point convergence index with the likelihood of lines (e.g., spiculations) relating to architectural distortion.

Materials and methods

Validation was performed using 25 computed radiography (CR) mammograms, each of which has an architectural distortion with radiating spiculations. The proposed method comprises five steps. First, the lines were extracted on mammograms, such as spiculations of architectural distortion as well as lines in the mammary gland. Second, the likelihood of spiculation for each extracted line was calculated. In the third step, point convergence index weighted by this likelihood was evaluated at each pixel to enhance distortion only. Fourth, local maxima of the index were extracted as candidates for the distortion, then classified based on nine features in the last step.

Results

Point convergence index without the proposed likelihood generated 84.48/image false-positives (FPs) on average. Conversely, the proposed index succeeded in decreasing this number to 12.48/image on average when sensitivity was 100%. After the classification step, number of FPs was reduced to 0.80/image with 80.0% sensitivity.

Conclusion

Combination of the likelihood of lines with point convergence index is effective in extracting architectural distortion with radiating spiculations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AD:

Architectural distortion

CAD:

Computer-assisted detection/diagnosis

CR:

Computed radiography

References

  1. Minami Y, Tsubono Y, Nishino Y, Ohuchi N, Shibuya D, Hisamichi S (2003) The increase of female breast cancer incidence in Japan: emergency of Birth cohort effect. Int J Cancer 108: 901–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Erickson BJ, Bartholmai B (2002) Computer-aided detection and diagnosis at the start of the third millennium. J Digital Imaging 15: 59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Radiology (1998) Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, VA

  4. Burrell HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson ARM, Pinder SE, Evans AJ, Yeoman LJ, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Blamey RW, Robertson JFR (1996) Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognostic factors. Radiology 199: 811–817

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, Soo MS (2003) Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. Am J Roentgenol 184: 1083–1088

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evans AJ, Pinder SE, James JJ, Ellis IO, Cornford E (2006) Is mammographic spiculation an independent, Good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer?. Am J Roentgenol 187: 1377–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zwiggelaar R, Parr TC, Schumm JE, Hutt IW, Taylor CJ, Astlay SM, Boggis CRM (1999) Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms. Med Image Anal 3(1): 39–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kegelmeyer WP Jr, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper ML (1994) Computer-aided mammographic screening for speculated lesions. Radiology 191: 331–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mudigonda NR, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JEL (2001) Detection of breast masses in mammogram by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(12): 1215–1227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sampat MP, Whitman GJ, Markey MK, Bovik AC (2005) Evidence based detection of spiculated masses and architectural distortions. SPIE 5747: 26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2004) Detection of architectural distortion in mammograms using phase portraits. SPIE 5370: 587–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2007) Reduction of false positives in the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms by using a geometrically constrained phase portrait model. Int J CARS 1(6): 361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ichikawa T, Matsubara T, Hara T, Fujita H, Endo T, Iwase T (2004) Automated detection method for architectural distortion areas on mammograms based on morphological processing and surface analysis. SPIE 5370: 920–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo Q, Shao J, Ruiz V (2005) Investigation of support vector machine for the detection of architectural distortion in mammographic images. J Phys Conf Ser 15: 88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tourassi GD, Delong DM, Floyd CE Jr (2006) A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms. Phys Med Biol 51(5): 1299–1312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tateno T, Iinuma T, Takano M (1987) Computed radiography. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yamada S, Murase K (2005) Effectiveness of flexible noise control image processing for digital portal images using computed radiography. Br J Radiol 78(930): 519–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamada M, Shimura K, Nagata T (2003) Selective pattern enhancement processing for digital mammography, algorithms, and the visual evaluation. Proc SPIE 5034: 328–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshinaga Y, Kobatake H (2000) The line detection method with robustness against contrast and width variation applied in gradient vector field. Syst Comp Japan 31(3): 49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toriwaki J, Hasegawa J, Fukumura T (1976) Recognition of vessel shadows for automated measurements and classification System of Chest photofluorograms. In: Symposium on computer aided diagnosis of medical images, pp 1–8

  21. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber 9(1): 62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasegawa J, Tsutsui T, Toriwaki J (1991) Automated extraction of cancer lesions with convergent fold patterns in double contrast X-ray image of stomach. Syst Comp Japan 22(7): 51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Monga O, Benayoun S (1995) Using partial derivatives of 3D images to extract typical surface features. Comp Vis Image Understanding 61(2): 171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thirion JP, Gourdon A (1995) Computing the differential characteristics of isointensity surface. Comp Vis Image Understanding 61(2): 190–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pudil P, Ferri FJ, Novovicova J, Kittler J (1994) Floating search methods for feature selection with nonmonotoniccriterion functions. In: IEEE Conf B, 12th IAPR, vol 2, pp 279–283

  26. te Brake GM, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JHCL (2000) An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol 45: 2843–2857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fukunaga K (1990) Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 219–221

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Radiology 143: 29–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148: 839–843

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fukunaga K (1990) Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 225–229

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nemoto M, Shimizu A, Kobatake H, Takeo H, Nawano S (2005) Classifier ensemble for mammography CAD system combining feature selection with ensemble learning. In: Proceedings of computer assisted radiology and surgery, pp 1047–1051

  32. Viola P, Jones M (2001) Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of a simple feature. Proc IEEE Comp Soc Conf CVPR 2001: 511–518

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsutaka Nemoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nemoto, M., Honmura, S., Shimizu, A. et al. A pilot study of architectural distortion detection in mammograms based on characteristics of line shadows. Int J CARS 4, 27–36 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0267-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0267-9

Keywords

Navigation