Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Artificial Neural Network for Detection of Simulated Dental Caries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objects A neural network was developed to diagnose artificial dental caries using images from a charged-coupled device (CCD)camera and intra-oral digital radiography. The diagnostic performance of this neural network was evaluated against a gold standard.

Materials and methods The neural network design was the Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ) used to classify a tooth surface as sound or as having dental caries. The depth of the dental caries was indicated on a graphic user interface (GUI) screen developed by Matlab programming. Forty-nine images of both sound and simulated dental caries, derived from a CCD camera and by digital radiography, were used to ‘train’ an artificial neural network. After the ’training’ process, a separate test-set comprising 322 unseen images was evaluated. Tooth sections and microscopic examinations were used to confirm the actual dental caries status.The performance of neural network was evaluated using diagnostic test.

Results The sensitivity (95%CI)/specificity (95%CI) of dental caries detection by the CCD camera and digital radiography were 0.77(0.68-0.85)/0.85(0.75-0.92) and 0.81(0.72-0.88)/0.93(0.84-0.97), respectively. The accuracy of caries depth-detection by the CCD camera and digital radiography was 58 and 40%, respectively.

Conclusions The model neural network used in this study could be a prototype for caries detection but should be improved for classifying caries depth. Our study suggests an artificial neural network can be trained to make the correct interpretations of dental caries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Douglas CW, Valachovic RW, Wijesinha A, Chauncey HH, Kapur KK, McNeil BJ (1986) Clinical efficacy of dental radiography in the detection of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62:330–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van der Stelt PF (2000) Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digial imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29:312–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abreu M Jr, Mol A, Ludlow JB (2001) Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91:381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wenzel A (2001) Computer-automated caries detection in digital bitewings: consistency of a program and its influence on observer agreement. Caries Res 35:12–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wenzel A, Hintze H, Kold LM, Kold S (2002) Accuracy of computer-automated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers. Eur J Oral Sci 110:199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale M (1995) Neural network design. PWS Publishing Co, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindahl D, Palmer J, Edenbrandt L (1999) Myocardial SPET: artificial neural networks describe extent and severity of perfusion defects. Clin Physiol 19:497–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holst H, Mare K, Jarund A, Astrom K, Evander E, Ohlsso M, Edenbrandt L (2001) An independent evaluation of a new method for automated interpretation of lung scintigrams using artificial neural networks. Eur J Nucl Med 28: 33–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mendonça EA (2004) Clinical decision support systems: perspectives in dentistry. J Dent Educ 68:589–597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyle EL, Higham SM, Edgar WM (1998) The production of subsurfaced artificial caries lesion on third molar teeth. Caries Res 32:154–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Speight PM, Elliott AE, Jullien JA, Downer MC, Zakzrewska JM (1995) The use of artificial intelligence to identify people at risk of oral cancer and precancer. Br Dent J 179:382– 387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brickley MR, Shepherd JP (1997) Comparisons of the abilities of a neural network and three consultant oral surgeons to make decisions about third molar removal. Br Dent J 182: 59–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Park SW, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC, Park TW, You DS (1999) Artificial neural network system in evaluating cervical lymphnode metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 29:149–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suwadee Kositbowornchai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kositbowornchai, S., Siriteptawee, S., Plermkamon, S. et al. An Artificial Neural Network for Detection of Simulated Dental Caries. Int J CARS 1, 91–96 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-006-0040-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-006-0040-x

Keywords

Navigation