Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reproducibility of retrobulbar blood flow velocity measurements in normal subjects using two different CDI devices

  • HEAD, NECK AND DENTAL RADIOLOGY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was done to evaluate the intra- and inter-operator reproducibility of colour Doppler imaging (CDI) in assessing blood flow velocity in the ophthalmic (OA), central retinal (CRA) and short posterior ciliary arteries (SPCA) in healthy subjects.

Materials and methods

The right eye of two groups of eight healthy volunteers was examined. Two radiologists and two ophthalmologists, divided into pairs, measured peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV) and resistivity index (RI) of each vessel using a different CDI device for each group. The concordance between two measurements was evaluated with Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

Results

Globally, very good degrees of intra-operator concordance were obtained for the PSV (0.859 cm/s), EDV (0.834 cm/s) and RI (0.859) of the OA. There was moderate concordance for PSV (0.574 cm/s) and EDV (0.594 cm/s) and good concordance for RI (0.694) for the CRA. Good degrees of concordance were obtained for the SPCA measurements. However, inter-operator concordance was found globally poor.

Conclusions

These data show that CDI measurements in retrobulbar vessels are operator dependent. To increase the intra-operator and inter-operator concordance, rules should be adopted for timing of the examination and positioning of the probe to minimise the pressure applied on the eye.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Glaucoma Society (2008) Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma, 3rd edn. Dogma, Savona

    Google Scholar 

  2. Galassi F, Giambene B, Varriale R (2011) Systemic vascular dysregulation and retrobulbar hemodynamics in normal-tension glaucoma. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 52:4467–4471. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Galassi F, Giambene B, Menchini U (2008) Ocular perfusion pressure and retrobulbar haemodynamics in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:411–416. doi:10.1007/s00417-007-0709-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris A, Kagemann L, Cioffi GA (1998) Assessment of human ocular hemodynamics. Surv Ophthalmol 42:509–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tranquart F, Bergès O, Koskas P et al (2003) Color Doppler imaging of orbital vessels: personal experience and literature review. J Clin Ultrasound 31:258–273. doi:10.1002/jcu.10169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rojanapongpun P, Morrison B, Drance SM (1993) Reproducibility of transcranial Doppler ultrasound examinations of the ophthalmic artery flow velocity. Br J Ophthalmol 77:22–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rankin SJ, Walman BE, Buckley AR, Drance SM (1995) Color Doppler imaging and spectral analysis of the optic nerve vasculature in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 119:685–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Quaranta L, Harris A, Donato F et al (1997) Color Doppler imaging of ophthalmic artery blood flow velocity: a study of repeatability and agreement. Ophthalmology 104:653–658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stalmans I, Siesky B, Zeyen T et al (2009) Reproducibility of color Doppler imaging. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247:1531–1538. doi:10.1007/s00417-009-1178-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehrlich R, Harris A, Siesky B et al (2011) Repeatability of retrobulbar blood flow velocity measured using color Doppler imaging in the Indianapolis Glaucoma Progression Study. J Glaucoma 20:540–547. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f46606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brunel P, Girend X, Laurent S et al (1992) Acute changes in forearm haemodynamics produced by cigarette smoking in healthy normotensive non-smokers are not influenced by propranolol or pindolol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 42:143–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mort JR, Kruse HR (2008) Timing of blood pressure measurement related to caffeine consumption. Ann Pharmacother 42:105–110. doi:10.1345/aph.1K337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stalmans I, Vandewalle E, Anderson DR et al (2011) Use of colour Doppler imaging in ocular blood flow research. Acta Ophthalmol 89:609–630. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02178.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmtterer L, Kiel J (2012) Ocular Blood Flow. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaoa J, Panb Y, Haberb M (2012) Assessment of observer agreement for matched repeated binary measurements. Comput Stat Data An 56:1052–1060. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2011.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlson KH, McLaren JW, Topper JE, Brubaker RF (1987) Effect of body position on intraocular pressure and aqueous flow. Invest Ophthalmol 28:1346–1352

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Founti P, Harris A, Papadopoulou D et al (2011) Agreement among three examiners of color Doppler imaging retrobulbar blood flow velocity measurements. Acta Ophthalmol 89(8):e631–e634. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02236.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Németh J, Kovacs R, Harkanyi Z et al (2002) Observer experience improves reproducibility of color Doppler sonography of orbital blood vessels. J Clin Ultrasound 30:332–335. doi:10.1002/jcu.10079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Centro per la Comunicazione e la Ricerca of the Ghislieri College of Pavia for supporting the project “Investigation of hemodynamics of the optic nerve with color Doppler imaging in normal tension glaucoma”.

Conflict of interest

C. Dellafiore, M. Lava, A. C. Verticchio Vercellin, C. A. Cutolo, C. Tinelli, F. Calliada, G. Milano declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study.

Ethical standards

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Dellafiore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dellafiore, C., Lava, M., Verticchio Vercellin, A.C. et al. Reproducibility of retrobulbar blood flow velocity measurements in normal subjects using two different CDI devices. Radiol med 120, 737–744 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0522-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0522-4

Keywords

Navigation