Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: indications, study protocols and safety

Risonanza magnetica fetale. Indicazioni, protocolli di studio e sicurezza

  • Pediatric Radiology / Radiologia Pediatrica
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to outline the real indications for fetal magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) based on the current clinical and scientific evidence and to determine where it fits into prenatal diagnostic protocols. We also consider the most commonly used FMRI diagnostic protocols and take stock of the safety aspects of this examination. This paper is the result of the work of the Fetal Magnetic Resonance (FMR) Study Group of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) in cooperation with the Study Group of the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (SIEOG). It has been reviewed and approved by the Italian Association of Neuroradiology (AINR). As FMRI is undergoing continuous development, and its indications and role are also likely to change over time, the Fetal Magnetic Resonance Study Group is in agreement with the other scientific bodies involved in the drafting of this document to propose subsequent modifications to it when new clinical and scientific evidence suggest the need.

Riassunto

L’obiettivo di questo lavoro è quello di dare delle risposte, sulla base delle evidenze clinico-scientifiche, a quali siano ad oggi le reali indicazioni allo studio con risonanza magnetica fetale (RMF) e dove questo debba collocarsi nei protocolli diagnostici prenatali. Il documento considera inoltre i protocolli diagnostici di RMF maggiormente in uso e fa il punto sulla sicurezza di questo esame. Questo lavoro è il risultato della attività del Gruppo di Studio di Risonanza Magnetica Fetale della Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica (SIRM) svolto in collaborazione con Gruppo di Studio della Società Italiana di Ecografia Ostetrico-Ginecologico (SIEOG) e rivisto ed approvato anche dal direttivo della Associazione Italiana di Neuroradiologia (AINR). In quanto tecnica in continua evoluzione, anche indicazioni e ruolo della RMF sono destinati verosimilmente a cambiare nel tempo: il Gruppo di Studio in RMF si propone, in accordo con le altre società coinvolte, di indicare successive modifiche a questo documento quando nuove evidenze clinico-scientifiche lo renderanno necessario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References/Bibliografia

  1. Parazzini C, Righini A, Rustico M et al (2008) Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: brain normal linear biometric values below 24 gestational weeks. Neuroradiology 50:877–883

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Garel C (2006) New advances in fetal MR neuroimaging. Pediatr Radiol 36:621–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pilu G (2004) Bollettino SIEOG. SIEOG, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bulas D (2007) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging as a complement to fetal ultrasonography. Ultrasound Q 23:3–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perrone A, Savelli S, Maggi C et al (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography in fetal pathology. Radiol Med 113:225–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Manganaro L, Perrone A, Savelli S et al (2008) Evaluation of normal brain development by prenatal MR imaging. Radiol Med 112:444–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagenvoort AM, Bekker MN, Go AT et al (2000) Ultrafast scan magnetic resonance in prenatal diagnosis. Fetal Diagn Ther 15:364–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Santos XM, Papanna R, Johnson A et al (2010) The use of combined ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of fetal anomalies. Prenatal Diagnosis 30:402–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blaicher W, Prayer D, Bernaschek G (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in the assessment of the fetal central nervous system. J Perinat Med 31:459–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huisman TA, Wisser J, Martin E et al (2002) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system: a pictorial essay. Eur Radiol 12:1952–1961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kubik-Huch RA, Huisman TA, Wisser J et al (2000) Ultrafast MR imaging of the fetus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1599–1606

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon EM, Goldstein RB, Coakley FV et al (2000) Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1688–1698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Triulzi F, Parazzini C, Righini A (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of fetal cerebellar development. Cerebellum 5:199–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shinmoto H, Kashima K, Yuasa Y et al (2000) MR imaging of non-CNS fetal abnormalities: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 20:1227–1243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Daltro P, Werner H, Gasparetto TD et al (2010) Congenital chest malformations: a multimodality approach with emphasis on fetal MR imaging. Radiographics 30:385–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barnewolt CE (2004) Congenital abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract. Semin Roentgenol 39:263–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brugger PC, Prayer D (2006) Fetal abdominal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 57:278–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beeghly M, Ware J, Soul J et al (2010) Neurodevelopmental outcome of fetuses referred for ventriculomegaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:405–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Garel C, Salomon LJ (2006) Thirdtrimester fetal MRI in isolated 10- to 12-mm ventriculomegaly: is it worth it? BJOG 113:942–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B, Levine D (2007) What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal sonographic diagnosis of ventriculomegaly? J Ultrasound Med 26:1513–1522

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Manganaro L, Savelli S, Francioso A et al (2009) Role of fetal MRI in the diagnosis of cerebral ventriculomegaly assessed by ultrasonography. Radiol Med 114:1013–1023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Levine D, Barnes PD, Madsen IR et al (1999) Central nervous system abnormalities assessed with prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 94:1011–1019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gumares CV, Kline Fath BM, Linam LE, Calva Garcia MA, Rubio EI, Lim FY (2010) MRI findings in multifetal pregnancies complicated by twin reversal arterial perfusion sequence (TRAP). Pediatr Radiol DOI: 10.1007/s00247-010-1921-2

  24. Zhang Z, Liu S, Teng G, Fang F, Yu T, Zang F (2010) Development of fetal brain of 20 weeks gestational age: with post-mortem MRI. Eur J Radiol DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.024

  25. Doneda C, Parazzini C, Righini A et al (2010) Early cerebral lesions in cytomegalovirus infection: prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 255:613–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glenn OA, Goldstein RB, Li KC et al (2005) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected abnormalities of the corpus callosum. J Ultrasound Med 24:791–804

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hollier LM, Grissom H (2005) Human herpes viruses in pregnancy: cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and varicella zoster virus. Clin Perinatol 32:671–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Napolitano M, Righini A, Zirpoli S et al (2004) Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging of rhombencephalosynapsis and associated brain anomalies: report of 3 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:762–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmook MT, Brugger PC, Weber M et al (2010) Forebrain development in fetal MRI: evaluation of anatomical landmarks before gestational week 27. Neuroradiology 52:495–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wolpert SM, Anderson M, Scott RM et al (1987) Chiari II malformation: MR imaging evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 149:1033–1042

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Righini A, Zirpoli S, Mrakic F et al (2004) Early prenatal MR imaging diagnosis of polymicrogyria AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:343–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Righini A, Bianchini E, Parazzini C et al (2003) Apparent diffusion coefficient determination in normal fetal brain: a prenatal MR imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:799–804

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gilbert JN, Jones KL, Rorke LB et al (1986) Central nervous system anomalies associated with meningomyelocele, hydrocephalus, and the Arnold-Chiari malformation: reappraisal of theories regarding the pathogenesis of posterior neural tube closure defects. Neurosurgery 18:559–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kok RD, Van Den Berg PP, Van Den Bergh AJ et al (2002) MR spectroscopy in the human fetus. Radiology 223:584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Girard N, Gouny SC, Viola A et al (2006) Assessment of normal fetal brain maturation in utero by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 56:768–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Coakley FV, Hricak H, Filly RA (1999) Complex fetal disorders: effect of MR imaging on management-preliminary clinical experience. Radiology 213:691–696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bui T, Daire JL, Chalard F et al (2006) Microstructural development of human brain assessed in utero by diffusion tensor imaging. Pediatr Radiol 36:1133–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Righini A, Salmona S, Bianchini E et al (2004) Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ischemic brain lesions in the survivors of monochorionic twin pregnancies: report of 3 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:87–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kline-Fath BM, Calvo-Garcia MA, O’hara SM et al (2007) Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: cerebral ischemia is not the only fetal MR imaging finding. Pediatr Radiol 37:47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Borecky N, Gudinchet F, Laurini R et al (1995) Imaging of cervico-thoracic lymphangiomas in children. Pediatr Radiol 25:127–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tekşam M, Ozyer U, Mckinney A, Kirba I (2005) MR imaging and ultrasound of fetal cervical cystic lymphangioma: utility in antepartum treatment planning. Diagn Interv Radiol 11:87–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Goldstein RB (2006) A practical approach to fetal chest masses. Ultrasound Q 22:177–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stocker JT, Madewell JE, Drake RM (1977) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Classification and morphologic spectrum. Hum Pathol 8:155–171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Dolkart LA, Reimers FT, Wertheimer IS, Wilson BO (1992) Prenatal diagnosis of laryngeal atresia. J Ultrasound Med 11:496–498

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Paek BW, Coakley FV, Lu Y et al (2001) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: prenatal evaluation with MR lung volumetry-preliminary experience. Radiology 220:63–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Keller TM, Rake A, Michel SC et al (2004) MR assessment of fetal lung development using lung volumes and signal intensities. Eur Radiol 14:984–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gorincour G, Bourliere-Najean B, Bonello B et al (2007) Feasibility of fetal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:105–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Manganaro L, Savelli S, Di Maurizio M et al (2008) Potential role of fetal cardiac evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience. Prenat Diagn 28:148–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shinmoto H, Kuribayashi S (2003) MRI of fetal abdominal abnormalities. Abdom Imaging 28:877–886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hill BJ, Joe BN, Qayyum A et al (2005) Supplemental value of MRI in fetal abdominal disease detected on prenatal sonography: preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:993–998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Huisman TA, Kellenberger CJ (2008) MR imaging characteristics of the normal fetal gastrointestinal tract and abdomen. Eur J Radiol 65:170–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Inaoka T, Sugimori H, Sasaki Y et al (2007) VIBE MRI for evaluating the normal and abnormal gastrointestinal tract in fetuses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W303–W308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Saguintaah M, Couture A, Veyrac C et al (2002) MRI of the fetal gastrointestinal tract. Pediatr Radiol 32:395–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Veyrac C, Couture A, Saguintaah M, Baud C (2004) MRI of fetal GI tract abnormalities. Abdom Imaging 29:411–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Farhataziz N, Engels JE, Ramus RM et al (2005) Fetal MRI of urine and meconium by gestational age for the diagnosis of genitourinary and gastrointestinal abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1891–1897

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chaumoitre K, Colavolpe N, Shojai R et al (2007) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) determination in normal and pathological fetal kidneys. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:22–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Manganaro L, Francioso A, Savelli S et al (2009) Fetal MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) assessment in the evaluation of renal development: preliminary experience in normal kidneys. Radiol Med 114:403–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Cohen HL, Kravets F, Zucconi W et al (2004) Congenital abnormalities of the genitourinary system. Semin Roentgenol 39:282–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hawkins JS, Dashe JS, Twickler DM (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of severe fetal renal anomalies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:328e1–328e5

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hörmann M, Brugger PC, Balassy C et al (2006) Fetal MRI of the urinary system. Eur J Radiol 57:303–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mcmann LP, Kirsch AJ, Scherz HC et al (2006) Magnetic resonance urography in the evaluation of prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis and renal dysgenesis. J Urol 176:1786–1792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Morales Ramos DA, Albuquerque PA, Carpineta L, Faingold R (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the urinary tract in the fetal and pediatric population. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36:153–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Picone O, Laperelle J, Sonigo P et al (2007) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the antenatal diagnosis and management of hydrocolpos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:105–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Shimada T, Miura K, Gotoh H et al (2008) Management of prenatal ovarian cysts. Early Hum Dev 84:417–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Gowland P (2005) Placental MRI. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 10:485–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lax A, Prince MR, Mennitt KW et al (2007) The value of specific MRI features in the evaluation of suspected placental invasion. Magn Reson Imaging 25:87–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Mazouni C, Gorincour G, Juhan V, Bretelle F (2007) Placenta accreta: a review of current advances in prenatal diagnosis. Placenta 28:599–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Abramowicz JS, Sheiner E (2007) In utero imaging of the placenta: importance for diseases of pregnancy. Placenta 28[Suppl A]:S14–S22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR et al (1994) A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echoplanar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:32–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL (2005) A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87:335–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Dimbylow P (2007) SAR in the mother and foetus for RF plane wave irradiation. Phys Med Biol 52:3791–3802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hand JW, Li Y, Thomas EL et al (2006) Prediction of specific absorption rate in mother and fetus associated with MRI examinations during pregnancy. Magn Reson Med 55:883–893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Levine D, Zuo C, Faro CB et al (2001) Potential heating effect in the gravid uterus during MR HASTE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:856–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Nagaoka T, Togashi T, Saito K et al (2006) An anatomically realistic voxel model of the pregnant woman and numerical dosimetry for a whole-body exposure to RF electromagnetic fields. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:5463–5467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Shellock FG, Kanal E (1994) Guidelines and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management. III. Questionnaire for screening patients before MR procedures. The SMRI Safety Committee. J Magn Reson Imaging 4:749–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Stuchly MA, Abrishamkar H, Strydom ML (2006) Numerical evaluation of radio frequency power deposition in human models during MRI. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:272–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Triulzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Triulzi, F., Manganaro, L. & Volpe, P. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: indications, study protocols and safety. Radiol med 116, 337–350 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-011-0633-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-011-0633-5

Keywords

Parole chiave

Navigation