Abstract
During the pandemic, instructional designers in higher education were busy helping the faculty members transition to remote teaching within a matter of days. However, urgent instructional design (ID) support was not uncommon before the pandemic, especially when supporting adjunct faculty members. After all, design constraints tend to exist in ID projects. This column article discusses an ID model called the layers- of- necessity model. The purpose of this article is to inspire ID practitioners, despite the design constraints, with ideas for supporting faculty in course design activities during pandemic and post-pandemic transition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baaki, J. (2018). Tessmer and Wedman: Ahead of their time. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 7(2), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.28990/jaid2018.072004.
Center for the Advancement of Faculty Excellence. (n.d.). Quick start guide. Retrieved March 2, 2021, from https://elearning.cpp.edu/course-design-academy/#qs_guide
Lowe, A. J., Thurston, W. I., & Brown, S. B. (1983). Clinical approach to formative evaluation. Performance & Instruction, 22(5), 8–11.
Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. F. (1990). A layers-of-necessity instructional development model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298271.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muljana, P.S. Course-Designing during the Pandemic and Post-Pandemic by Adopting the Layers-of-Necessity Model. TechTrends 65, 253–255 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00611-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00611-x