Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment Retention Improves Nationally Recommended Preventive Primary Care Screenings when Integrated into Urban Federally Qualified Health Centers

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buprenorphine maintenance therapy (BMT) expands treatment access for opioid dependence and can be integrated into primary health-care settings. Treating opioid dependence, however, should ideally improve other aspects of overall health, including preventive services. Therefore, we examined how BMT affects preventive health-care outcomes, specifically nine nationally recommended primary care quality health-care indicators (QHIs), within federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) from an observational cohort study of 266 opioid-dependent patients initiating BMT between 07/01/07 and 11/30/08 within Connecticut’s largest FQHC network. Nine nationally recommended preventive QHIs were collected longitudinally from electronic health records, including screening for chronic infections, metabolic conditions, and cancer. A composite QHI score (QHI-S), based on the percentage of eligible QHIs achieved, was categorized as QHI-S ≥80 % (recommended) and ≥90 % (optimal). The proportion of subjects achieving a composite QHI-S ≥80 and ≥90 % was 57.1 and 28.6 %, respectively. Screening was highest for hypertension (91.0 %), hepatitis C (80.1 %), hepatitis B (76.3 %), human immunodeficiency virus (71.4 %), and hyperlipidemia (72.9 %) and lower for syphilis (49.3 %) and cervical (58.5 %), breast (44.4 %), and colorectal (48.7 %) cancer. Achieving QHI-S ≥80 % was positively and independently associated with ≥3-month BMT retention (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.19; 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.18–4.04) and BMT prescription by primary care providers (PCPs) rather than addiction psychiatric specialists (AOR = 3.38; 95 % CI = 1.78–6.37), and negatively with being female (AOR = 0.30; 95 % CI = 0.16–0.55). Within primary health-care settings, achieving greater nationally recommended health-care screenings or QHIs was associated with being able to successfully retain patients on buprenorphine longer (3 months or more) and when buprenorphine was prescribed simultaneously by PCPs rather than psychiatric specialists. Decreased preventive screening for opioid-dependent women, however, may require gender-based strategies for achieving health-care parity. When patients can be retained, integrating BMT into urban FQHCs is associated with improved health outcomes including increased multiple preventive health-care screenings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Degenhardt L, Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to illicit drug use and dependence: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013; 382(9904): 1564–1574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The TEDS Report: characteristics of adolescent heroin admissions. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies; 2009.

  3. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: overview of key findings, 2009. National Institutes on Drug Abuse, ed. Bethesda, MD; 2010: (NIH Publication No. 10–7583)

  4. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: summary of national findings. Vol NSDUH Series H-44, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 12-4713. Rockville, MD; 2012.

  5. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The DAWN Report: Highlights of the 2010 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) findings on drug-related emergency department visits. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, ed. Rockville, MD; 2012.

  6. SAMHSA. Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: national findings. Office of Applied Studies, ed. HHS Publication No. SMA 10-4856: Rockville, MD; 2011.

  7. Lankenau SE, Teti M, Silva K, Jackson Bloom J, Harocopos A, Treese M. Initiation into prescription opioid misuse amongst young injection drug users. Int J Drug Pol. 2012; 23(1): 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Altice FL, Kamarulzaman A, Soriano VV, Schechter M, Friedland GH. Treatment of medical, psychiatric, and substance-use comorbidities in people infected with HIV who use drugs. Lancet. 2010; 376(9738): 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kleber HD. Pharmacologic treatments for heroin and cocaine dependence. Am J Addict. 2003; 12(Suppl 2): S5–S18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Alba I, Samet JH, Saitz R. Burden of medical illness in drug- and alcohol-dependent persons without primary care. Am J Addict. 2004; 13(1): 33–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swindle RW, Rao JK, Helmy A, et al. Integrating clinical nurse specialists into the treatment of primary care patients with depression. Int J Psychiatr Med. 2003; 33(1): 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lieber CS. Hepatic and other medical disorders of alcoholism: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Stud Alcohol. 1998; 59(1): 9–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saitz R, Horton NJ, Larson MJ, Winter M, Samet JH. Primary medical care and reductions in addiction severity: a prospective cohort study. Addict. 2005; 100(1): 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Connock M, Juarez-Garcia A, Jowett S, et al. Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007; 11(9): 1–171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mattick RP, Kimber J, Breen C, Davoli M. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 2: CD002207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Basu S, Smith-Rohrberg D, Bruce RD, Altice FL. Models for integrating buprenorphine therapy into the primary HIV care setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 42(5): 716–721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Altice FL, Sullivan LE, Smith-Rohrberg D, Basu S, Stancliff S, Eldred L. The potential role of buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid dependence in HIV-infected individuals and in HIV infection prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 43(Suppl 4): S178–183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peikes D, Zutshi A, Genevro J, Smith K, Parchman M, Meyers D. Early evidence on the patient-centered medical home. Final report In: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, ed. Rockville, MD: Prepared by Mathematica Policy Research; 2012: AHRQ Publication No. 12-0020-EF. Accessed on June 17, 2013 at http://pcmh.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0020_11787_957210_957210_957210_957218/Early%957220Evidence%957220on%957220the%957220PCMH%957202%952028%952012.pdf.

  19. Butler M, Kane RL, McAlpine D, et al. Integration of mental health/Substance abuse and primary care. In: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, ed. Vol Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 173: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.

  20. Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. An evaluation of racial and ethnic health disparities in the state inpatient services. In: Office of Multicultural Affairs HDI, ed. Hartford, CT: Hartford Department of Public Health; 2008: Accessed on June 17, 2013 at: http://www.ct.gov/dmhas/lib/dmhas/oma/disparitiesreport.pdf.

  21. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2012 national healthcare disparities report. Rockville, MD; 2013: Accessed on July 9, 2013 at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhdr2012/index.html.

  22. Alford DP, LaBelle CT, Kretsch N, et al. Collaborative care of opioid-addicted patients in primary care using buprenorphine: five-year experience. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(5): 425–431.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khan MR, Berger A, Hemberg J, O’Neill A, Dyer TP, Smyrk K. Non-injection and injection drug use and STI/HIV risk in the United States: the degree to which sexual risk behaviors versus sex with an STI-infected partner account for infection transmission among drug users. AIDS Behav. 2013; 17(3): 1185–1194.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vlahov D, Wang C, Ompad D, et al. Mortality risk among recent-onset injection drug users in five U.S. cities. Subst Use Misuse. 2008; 43(3–4): 413–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Degenhardt L, Hall W, Warner-Smith M. Using cohort studies to estimate mortality among injecting drug users that is not attributable to AIDS. Sex Transm Infect. 2006; 82(Suppl 3): S56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bargagli AM, Sperati A, Davoli M, Forastiere F, Perucci CA. Mortality among problem drug users in Rome: an 18-year follow-up study, 1980–97. Addict. 2001; 96(10): 1455–1463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lloyd-Smith E, Brodkin E, Wood E, et al. Impact of HAART and injection drug use on life expectancy of two HIV-positive cohorts in British Columbia. AIDS. 2006; 20(3): 445–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration. Life expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studies. Lancet. 2008; 372(9635): 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. van Sighem AI, Gras LA, Reiss P, Brinkman K, de Wolf F. Life expectancy of recently diagnosed asymptomatic HIV-infected patients approaches that of uninfected individuals. AIDS. 2010; 24(10): 1527–1535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Haddad MS, Zelenev A, Altice FL. Integrating buprenorphine maintenance therapy into federally qualified health centers: real-world substance abuse treatment outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013; 131(1–2): 127–135.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Altice FL, Bruce RD, Lucas GM, et al. HIV treatment outcomes among HIV-infected, opioid-dependent patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone treatment within HIV clinical care settings: results from a multisite study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011; 56(Suppl 1): S22–32.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fiellin DA, Moore BA, Sullivan LE, et al. Long-term treatment with buprenorphine/naloxone in primary care: results at 2–5 years. Am J Addict. 2008; 17(2): 116–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Soeffing JM, Martin LD, Fingerhood MI, Jasinski DR, Rastegar DA. Buprenorphine maintenance treatment in a primary care setting: outcomes at 1 year. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009; 37(4): 426–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stein MD, Cioe P, Friedmann PD. Buprenorphine retention in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20(11): 1038–1041.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schwarz R, Zelenev A, Bruce RD, Altice FL. Retention on buprenorphine treatment reduces emergency department utilization, but not hospitalization, among treatment-seeking patients with opioid dependence. J Subst Abus Treat. 2012; 43(4): 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gelberg L, Andersen RM, Leake BD. The behavioral model for vulnerable populations: application to medical care use and outcomes for homeless people. Health Serv Res. 2000; 34(6): 1273–1302.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stein JA, Andersen R, Gelberg L. Applying the Gelberg–Andersen behavioral model for vulnerable populations to health services utilization in homeless women. J Health Psychol. 2007; 12(5): 791–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006; 55(RR-14): 1–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. In: Department of Health and Human Services, ed. Washington, DC; 2011:1–166; Available at http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2011.

  40. Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepatol. 2009; 49(4): 1335–1374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009. Hepatol. 2009; 50(3): 661–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Calonge N. Screening for syphilis infection: recommendation statement. Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2(4): 362–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lipid disorders in adults: U.S. Preventive services task force recommendation statement. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05114-EF-2, ed. Washington, DC; 2008: Accessed at http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/lipid/lipidrs.htm on December 13, 2012.

  44. American College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians. Cervical cytology screening. In: Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, ed. Washington, DC: ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 109. 2009.

  45. American College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians. Breast cancer screening. Washington: ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 42; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  46. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: clinical summary of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation In: AHRQ Publication No. 08-05124-EF-4, ed. Washington, DC; 2008: Accessed at http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/colocancer/colosum.htm on April 11, 2012.

  47. Preventive Services US. Task Force. Screening for high blood pressure: U.S. Preventive services task force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 147(11): 783–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Korthuis PT, Fiellin DA, Fu R, et al. Improving adherence to HIV quality of care indicators in persons with opioid dependence: the role of buprenorphine. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011; 56(Suppl 1): S83–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jackman S. Estimation and inference via Bayesian simulation: an introduction to Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am J Polit Sci. 2000; 44(2): 375–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sylla L, Bruce RD, Kamarulzaman A, Altice FL. Integration and co-location of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and drug treatment services. Int J Drug Pol. 2007; 18(4): 306–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. World Health Organization. Policy guidelines for collaborative TB and HIV services for injecting and other drug users: an integrated approach. In: Stop TB Department, ed. Geneva; 2008.

  52. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Integrated prevention services for HIV infection, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted diseases, and tuberculosis for persons who use drugs illicitly: summary guidance from CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012; 61(RR-5): 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Abrams MT, Myers CS, Feldman SM, et al. Cervical cancer screening and acute care visits among medicaid enrollees with mental and substance use disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2012; 63(8): 815–822.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pleis JR, Ward BW, Lucas JW. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey. Vital Health Stat 10. 2009; 2010(249): 1–207.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chadwick JJ, Andrade LF, Altice FL, Petry NM. Correlates of having never been HIV tested among entrants to substance abuse treatment clinics: empiric findings from real-world new england settings. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014; 46(3): 208–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. D’Aunno T, Pollack HA, Jiang L, Metsch LR, Friedmann PD. HIV testing in the nation’s opioid treatment programs, 2005–2011: the role of state regulations. Health Serv Res. 2014; 49(1): 230–248.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Edelman EJ, Dinh AT, Moore BA, Schottenfeld RS, Fiellin DA, Sullivan LE. Human immunodeficiency virus testing practices among buprenorphine-prescribing physicians. J Addict Med. 2012; 6(2): 159–165.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Brown LS Jr, Kritz SA, Goldsmith RJ, et al. Characteristics of substance abuse treatment programs providing services for HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C virus infection, and sexually transmitted infections: the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006; 30(4): 315–321.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Weinbaum CM, Williams I, Mast EE, et al. Recommendations for identification and public health management of persons with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008; 57(RR-8): 1–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Springer SA, Qiu J, Saber-Tehrani AS, Altice FL. Retention on buprenorphine is associated with high levels of maximal viral suppression among HIV-infected opioid dependent released prisoners. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5): e38335.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rosenman MB, Tao G, Szucs KA, Wang J, Ambuehl R, Mahon BE. Prenatal syphilis screening rates measured using medicaid claims and electronic medical records. Sex Transm Dis. 2008; 35(4): 387–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. White DA, Alter HJ, Irvin NA, Clark MC, Frazee BW. Low rate of syphilis screening among high-risk emergency department patients tested for gonorrhea and chlamydia infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2012; 39(4): 286–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). State incidence of syphilis reporting, 2008. Atlanta, GA; 2009: Accessed on July 12, 2013 at: http://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis2008/AllSyphilisProfiles-2008.pdf.

  64. Callander D, Baker D, Chen M, Guy R. Including syphilis testing as part of standard HIV management checks and improved syphilis screening in primary care. Sex Transm Dis. 2013; 40(4): 338–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Adams PF, Heyman KM, Vickerie JL. Summary health statistics for the U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey. Vital Health Stat 10. 2008; 2009(243): 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system annual survey data: 2009 survey data. In: Office of Surveillance E, and Laboratory Services, ed. Atlanta, GA; 2009: Accessed on April 12, 2012 at http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/technical_infodata/surveydata/2009.htm.

  67. Ford ES, Li C, Pearson WS, Zhao G, Mokdad AH. Trends in hypercholesterolemia, treatment and control among United States adults. Int J Cardiol. 2010; 140(2): 226–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Gillespie CD, Keenan NL, Miner JB, Hong Y. Screening for lipid disorders among adults—National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, United States, 2005–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61(Suppl): 26–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ostchega Y, Yoon SS, Hughes J, Louis T. Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control—continued disparities in adults: United States, 2005–2006. NCHS Data Brief. 2008(3):1–8.

  70. Meyer JP, Springer SA, Altice FL. Substance abuse, violence, and HIV in women: a literature review of the syndemic. J Womens Health. 2011; 20(7): 991–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Coffield AB, Maciosek MV, McGinnis JM, et al. Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 21(1): 1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Nutting PA, Baier M, Werner JJ, Cutter G, Conry C, Stewart L. Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001; 14(5): 352–361.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Joseph DA, King JB, Miller JW, Richardson LC. Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among adults—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61(Suppl): 51–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Miller JW, King JB, Joseph DA, Richardson LC. Breast cancer screening among adult women—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61(Suppl): 46–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Korthuis PT, Tozzi MJ, Nandi V, et al. Improved quality of life for opioid-dependent patients receiving buprenorphine treatment in HIV clinics. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011; 56(Suppl 1): S39–45.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Bachireddy C, Soule MC, Izenberg JM, Dvoryak S, Dumchev K, Altice FL. Integration of health services improves multiple healthcare outcomes among HIV-infected people who inject drugs in Ukraine. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 134: 106–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Edelman EJ, Chantarat T, Caffrey S, et al. The impact of buprenorphine/naloxone treatment on HIV risk behaviors among HIV-infected, opioid-dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 139: 79–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Schwarz RK, Bruce RD, Ball SA, Herme M, Altice FL. Comparison of tuberculin skin testing reactivity in opioid-dependent patients seeking treatment with methadone versus buprenorphine: policy implications for tuberculosis screening. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2009; 35(6): 439–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Weiss L, Netherland J, Egan JE, et al. Integration of buprenorphine/naloxone treatment into HIV clinical care: lessons from the BHIVES collaborative. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011; 56(Suppl 1): S68–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast cancer screening and socioeconomic status—35 metropolitan areas, 2000 and 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005; 54(39): 981–985.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Coughlin SS, King J, Richards TB, Ekwueme DU. Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15(11): 2154–2159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Meyer JP, Zelenev A, Wickersham JA, Williams CT, Teixeira PA, Altice FL. Women released from jail experience suboptimal HIV treatment outcomes compared to men: results from a multi-center study. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104(3): 434–41.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Aziz M, Smith KY. Challenges and successes in linking HIV-infected women to care in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52(Suppl 2): S231–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Meyer JP, Zelenev A, Wickersham JA, Williams CT, Teixeira PA, Altice FL. Gender disparities in HIV treatment outcomes following release from jail: results from a multicenter study. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104(3): 434–441.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, Ehrlich CM, Miller LH. Satisfaction, gender, and communication in medical visits. Med Care. 1994; 32(12): 1216–1231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, Ehrlich CM, Miller LH. Gender in medical encounters: an analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. Health Psychol. 1994; 13(5): 384–392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: national findings. Rockville: Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-36, HHS Publication No. SMA 09–4434; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Results from the 2011 national survey on drug use and health: summary of national findings. Rockville, MD: NSDUH Series H-44, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 12–4713; 2012.

  89. Walley AY, Alperen JK, Cheng DM, et al. Office-based management of opioid dependence with buprenorphine: clinical practices and barriers. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(9): 1393–1398.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The National Institute on Drug Abuse provided career development funding for Professors Altice (K24 DA017072) and Zelenev (K01 DA037826).

Role of Funding Source

The National Institute on Drug Abuse had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Contributors

All authors participated in the research and manuscript preparation and have approved the final manuscript. All coauthors had complete access to the data each contributed to the other manuscript components:

a. Literature Review: Haddad, Zelenev and Altice

b. Statistical analysis: Zelenev, Haddad, and Altice

c. First draft of manuscript: Haddad

d. Data management: Haddad and Zelenev

e. Study Design: Haddad, Zelenev and Altice

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marwan S. Haddad.

Additional information

Prior Presentations

This work was previously presented as: Haddad MS, Zelenev A, Altice FL. Buprenorphine Treatment Reduces Harms and Improves Quality Health Outcomes [Oral Presentation, Abstract 884]. International Harm Reduction Conference. Vilnius, Lithuania. June 9–12, 2013.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haddad, M.S., Zelenev, A. & Altice, F.L. Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment Retention Improves Nationally Recommended Preventive Primary Care Screenings when Integrated into Urban Federally Qualified Health Centers. J Urban Health 92, 193–213 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9924-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9924-1

Keywords

Navigation