Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sampling and Recruitment in Multilevel Studies among Marginalized Urban Populations: The IMPACT Studies

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Illicit drug use in urban settings is a major public health problem. A range of individual level factors are known to influence drug use and its consequences, and a number of recent studies have suggested that the neighborhood in which an individual lives may also play a role. However, studies seeking to identify neighborhood-level determinants of drug use, particularly among marginalized urban populations, need to overcome significant challenges, particularly in the area of sampling and recruitment. One key issue is defining functional neighborhoods that are relevant to local residents. Another arises from the need to sample a representative or even a diverse population when studying marginalized groups such as illicit drug users. These are common problems that raise particular challenges when both need to be addressed in the same study. For example, many sampling approaches for neighborhood-level studies have included some form of random sample of households, but this may systematically overlook marginalized populations. On the other hand, the sampling approaches commonly used in studies of hidden populations such as chain referral, snow ball, and more recently, respondent-driven sampling, typically expand beyond a geographic “neighborhood.” We describe the organization and rationale for the IMPACT Studies in New York City as a case illustration on how such issues may be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hembree C, Galea S, Ahern J, et al. The urban built environment and overdose mortality in New York City neighborhoods. Health Place. 2005;11(2):147–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Galea S, Ahern J, Vlahov D, et al. Income distribution and risk of fatal drug overdose in New York City neighborhoods. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;70(2):139–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper HL, Friedman SR, Tempalski B, Friedman R. Residential segregation and injection drug use prevalence among black adults in US metropolitan areas. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(2):344–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diez Roux AV. Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(11):1783–1789.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krieger N, Waterman P, Chen JT, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R. Zip code caveat: bias due to spatiotemporal mismatches between zip codes and US census-defined geographic areas—the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(7):1100–1102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(5):471–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman SR, Flom PL, Kottiri BJ, et al. Drug use patterns and infection with sexually transmissible agents among young adults in a high-risk neighbourhood in New York City. Addiction. 2003;98(2):159–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inciardi JA, Surratt HL, Kurtz SP. HIV, HBV, and HCV infections among drug-involved, inner-city, street sex workers in Miami, Florida. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(2):139–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davidson PJ, McLean RL, Kral AH, Gleghorn AA, Edlin BR, Moss AR. Fatal heroin-related overdose in San Francisco, 1997–2000: a case for targeted intervention. J Urban Health. 2003;80(2):261–273 June.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Galea S, Nandi A, Vlahov D. The social epidemiology of substance use. Epidemiol Rev. 2004;26:36–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Latkin CA, Curry AD, Hua W, Davey MA. Direct and indirect associations of neighborhood disorder with drug use and high-risk sexual partners. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(6 Suppl):S234–S241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Winstanley EL, Steinwachs DM, Ensminger ME, Latkin CA, Stitzer ML, Olsen Y. The association of self-reported neighborhood disorganization and social capital with adolescent alcohol and drug use, dependence, and access to treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;92(1–3):173–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van de Goor LA, Garretsen HF, Kaplan C, Korf D, Spruit IP, de Zwart WM. Research methods for illegal drug use in hidden populations: summary report of a European invited expert meeting. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1994;26(1):33–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Watters JK, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations. J Social Problems. 1989;36(4):416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997;44(2):174–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watters JK, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations. J Soc Prob. 1989;36:416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiss L, Ompad D, Galea S, Vlahov D. Defining neighborhood boundaries for urban health research. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(6 Suppl):S154–S159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller KW, Wilder LB, Stillman FA, Becker DM. The feasibility of a street-intercept survey method in an African-American community. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(4):655–658.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Robins LN, Cottler L, Bucholz K, Compton W. Diagnostic interview schedule for DSM-IVSt. Louis: Washington University; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Freedy JR, Kilpatrick DG, Resnick HS. Natural disasters and mental health: theory, assessment, and intervention. J Soc Behav Personal. 1993;8(5):49–103.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Acierno R, Kilpatrick DG, Resnick H, Saunders B, De Arellano M, Best C. Assault, PTSD, family substance use, and depression as risk factors for cigarette use in youth: findings from the National Survey of Adolescents. J Trauma Stress. 2000;13(3):381–396.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census 2000. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic and Statistics Administration.

  23. Bryant WK, Ompad DC, Sisco S, et al. Determinants of influenza vaccination in hard-to-reach urban populations. Prev Med. 2006;43(1):60–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuller CM, Ompad DC, Galea S, Wu Y, Koblin BA, Vlahov D. Hepatitis C incidence—a comparison between injection and non-injection drug users in New York City. J Urban Health. 2004;81(1):20–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ompad DC, Galea S, Wu Y, et al. Acceptance and completion of hepatitis B vaccination among drug users in New York City. Commun Dis Public Health. 2004;7(4):294–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ompad DC, Galea S, Fuller CM, Phelan D, Vlahov D. Club drug use among minority substance users in New York City. J Psychoact Drugs. 2004;36(3):397–399.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Glynn M, Rhodes P. Estimated HIV prevalence in the United States at the end of 2003. National HIV Prevention Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, Jun 12–15, 2005; Atlanta, Georgia.

  28. Des Jarlais DC, Arasteh K, Perlis T, et al. Convergence of HIV seroprevalence among injecting and non-injecting drug users in New York City. AIDS. 2007;21(2):231–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Des Jarlais, Perlis T, Arasteh K, et al. Reductions in hepatitis C virus and HIV infections among injecting drug users in New York City, 1990–2001. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 3):S20–S25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tortu S, McMahon JM, Pouget ER, Hamid R. Sharing of noninjection drug-use implements as a risk factor for hepatitis C. Subst Use Misuse. 2004;39(2):211–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kottiri BJ, Friedman SR, Euler GL, et al. A community-based study of hepatitis B infection and immunization among young adults in a high-drug-use neighborhood in New York City. J Urban Health. 2005;82(3):479–487.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McQuillan GM, Coleman PJ, Kruszon-Moran D, Moyer LA, Lambert SB, Margolis HS. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1976 through 1994. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(1):14–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Armstrong GL, Wasley A, Simard EP, McQuillan GM, Kuhnert WL, Alter MJ. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):705–714.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was partly funded by grants DA018061, DA017020, and MH068192 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute of Mental Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle C. Ompad.

Additional information

Ompad, Galea, Fuller, Weiss, Beard, Chan, Edwards, and Vlahov are with the Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies, New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Galea is with the Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Marshall is with the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA; Fuller and Vlahov are with the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ompad, D.C., Galea, S., Marshall, G. et al. Sampling and Recruitment in Multilevel Studies among Marginalized Urban Populations: The IMPACT Studies. J Urban Health 85, 268–280 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9256-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9256-0

Keywords

Navigation