Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A unified treatment of the reference estimation problem in depth EEG recordings

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The starting point of this paper is the analysis of the reference problem in intra-cerebral electroencephalographic (iEEG) recordings. It is well accepted that both surface and depth EEG signals are always recorded with respect to some unknown time-varying signal called reference. This article discusses different methods for determining and reducing the influence of the reference signal for the iEEG signals. In particular, we derive optimal approaches for the estimation of the reference signal in iEEG recording setups and demonstrate their relation to the well-known minimum power/variance distortionless response approaches derived for general array and antenna signal processing applications. We show that the proposed approaches achieve optimal performance in terms of estimation error and that they outperform other reference identification methods proposed in the literature. The developed algorithms are illustrated on simulated examples and on real iEEG signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Synchronicity measures (coherence and similar methods) spectral analysis, source localization [2, 4, 5, 9, 11].

  2. Average or Laplacian references are never used for depth EEG signals. In fact, electrode placement is not symmetric, so there is no reason to suppose that signals should average to 0 as in scalp recordings.

  3. Hu et al. [7] proposed an alternative method replacing the FastICA step by simple principal component analysis, thus not imposing statistical independence but only decorrelation.

  4. Another ambiguity relates to the order of the sources, which is also impossible to recover.

  5. The BSS estimate \(\hat{r}_{\rm BSS}\) was selected, among all sources found by BSS, as the signal having the highest absolute value of the correlation coefficient with the original signal \(r.\)

  6. Still, other BSS algorithms, based on second-order statistics only (SOBI for example) will function also for Gaussian sources.

  7. More specific studies using connectivity measures will be described elsewhere.

References

  1. Dien J (1998) Issues in the application of the average reference: review, critiques and recommendations. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comp 30(1):34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Essl M, Rappelsberger P (1998) EEG coherence and reference signals: experimental results and mathematical explanations. Med Biol Eng Comput 39:399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hjorth B (1975) An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 39(5):526–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu S, Stead M, Dai Q, Worrell G (2010) On the recording reference contribution to EEG correlation, phase synchrony, and coherence. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 40(5):1294–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu S, Stead M, Gardner AB, Worrell GA (2007) Lecture notes in computer science: advances in neural networks. In: The effect of recording reference on EEG: phase synchrony and coherence. Springer, Berlin, pp 1273–1280

  6. Hu S, Stead M, Worrel G (2007) Automatic identification and removal of scalp reference signal for intracranial EEGs based on independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(9):1560–1572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu S, Stead M, Worrell G (2008) Removal of scalp reference signal and line noise for intracranial EEGs. In: IEEE international conference on networking, sensing and control, 2008. ICNSC 2008, pp 1486–1491

  8. Hyvärinen A (1999) Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 10(3):626–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koessler L, Salido-Ruiz R, Ranta R, Louis-Dorr V, Gavaret M, Maillard L (2010) Influence of source separation and montage on ictal source localization. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2010 Annual international conference of the IEEE, pp 2898–2901. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626321

  10. Maillard L, Koessler L, Colnat-Coulbois S, Vignal J, Louis-Dorr V, Marie P, Vespignani H (2009) Combined SEEG and source localisation study of temporal lobe schizencephaly and polymicrogyria. Clin Neurophysiol 120:1628–1636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pascual-Marqui RD (2007) Discrete, 3D distributed, linear imaging methods of electric neuronal activity. Part 1: exact, zero error localization. Tech. rep., The KEY Institute for Brain-Mind Research University Hospital of Psychiatry, Lenggstr. 31, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland. http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3341

  12. Ranta R, Madhu N (2012) Reference estimation in EEG: analysis of equivalent approaches. IEEE Signal Process Lett 19:12–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranta R, Salido-Ruiz R, Louis-Dorr V (2010) Reference estimation in EEG recordings. In: 32nd Annual international conference of the IEEE-EMBS. Buenos Aires, Argentina

  14. Salido-Ruiz R, Ranta R, Louis-Dorr V (2011) EEG montage analysis in the blind source separation framework. Biomed Signal Process Control 6(1):77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanei S, Chambers J (2007) EEG signal processing. Wiley, New York

  16. Strang G (1988) Linear algebra and its applications, 3 edn. Thomson/Brooks Cole, California

  17. van Trees HL (2002) Detection, estimation and modulation theory: part IV. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Woodbury MA (1950) Inverting modified matrices. Tech. Rep. Memorandum Rept. 42, Statistical Research Group, Princeton University

  19. Yao D (2001) A method to standardize a reference of scalp EEG recordings to a point at infinity. Physiol Meas 22:693–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Nilesh Madhu has been supported under the framework of ITN-AUDIS, Digital Signal Processing in Audiology (http://www.audis-itn.eu), funded by the European Union under the Framework 7 People Marie-Curie Programme. This research was partially funded by the Neuro-IC programm of CNRS, France. The authors would like to thank Dr. S. Colnat-Coulbois for her neurosurgical contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radu Ranta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madhu, N., Ranta, R., Maillard, L. et al. A unified treatment of the reference estimation problem in depth EEG recordings. Med Biol Eng Comput 50, 1003–1015 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0946-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0946-0

Keywords

Navigation