Abstract
This study was designed to investigate the nature of activities in an immersion English class and a non-immersion English class in the mainland of China, and to find out the differences between these two types of class through data gained from observation and interviews. Spoken discourse analysis was used to analyze the data, where Engeström’s activity complex system was used as the analytical framework to examine the nature of activities in the two types of classes. The results showed that it is the dynamic and situated nature of activity that makes a difference between the activities in these two classes. The interaction among the activity components, the social relations emerging through the process, the use of target language as the main mediational tool, and the subject content revealed in the activities enhance our emic understanding of the nature of activities. Implications can be drawn for English language teaching and for students’ English language learning for the schools in the mainland of China. This study contributes to both immersion education and classroom interaction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anton, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(3), 314–342.
Bedny, G., & Meister, D. (1997). The Russian theory of activity: Current applications to design and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brooks, F. B. (1992). Communicative competence and the conversation course: A social interaction perspective. Linguistics and Education, 4(2), 219–246.
Chi, Y. P., & Zhao, W. (2004). 我国小学英语浸入式教学实验综述 [A review of English immersion experiments in Chinese elementary schools]. 比较教育研究 [Comparative Education Review], 25(7), 13–18.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Donato, R. (1988). Beyond group: A psycholinguistic rationale for collective activity in second language learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language reseach (pp. 33–56). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Engestörm, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to development research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engestörm, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Fang, J. M., Wang, J. Y., & Siegel, L. (Eds). (2001). 当代中国少数民族双语教学理论与实践 [Theory and practice of bilingual teaching of contemporary China’s minorities]. 西安, 中国: 陕西人民教育出版社 [Xi’an, China: Shaanxi People’s Education Publishing House].
Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskian perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 19–44.
Genesee, F. (1985). Second language learning through immersion: A review of U.S. programs. Review of Research in Education, 55(4), 541–561.
Hall, J. K. (1995). (Re)creating our worlds with word: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 206–232.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Knell, E., Qiang, H. Y., Pei, M., Chi, Y. P., Siegel, L., Zhao, L., & Zhao W. (2007). Early English immersion and literacy in Xi’an China. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 395–417.
Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. American Psychologist, 41(3), 264–274.
Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian perspectives on second language research. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1–32). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141–158). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Luria, A. R. (1974). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 93–121.
Ohta, A. S. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in learner-learner classroom interaction. In L. F. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning. Monograph series Volume 8 (pp. 223–242). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Pei, M. (1998). 教师是浸入式教学模式的关键 (增刊) [Teacher as the key role in English immersion program (Supplemental edition)]. 陕西师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版) [Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)], (1), 26–30.
Pei, M. (2007). Scaffolding and participation in classroom interaction: Perspectives from English immersion teaching in the People’s Republic of China. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Qiang, H. Y. (2000). 加拿大第二语言浸入式教学创举及其在我国的尝试—双语人才早期培养研究 [Canadian second language immersion and application in China: Research on early cultivation of bilingualism]. 幼儿园教育教学 [Preschool Education Review], (5), 25–28.
Qiang, H. Y., & Zhao, L. (2000). 加拿大第二语言浸入式教学及其在我国的借鉴 [Canadian second language immersion and its application in China], 比较教育研究 [Comparative Education Review], (4), 38–41.
Qiang, H. Y., & Zhao, L. (2001). 中外第二语言浸入式教学研究 [A study of immersion models of second language learning in China and abroad]. 西安, 中国: 西安交通大学出版社 [Xi’an, China: Xi’an Jiaotong University Press].
Robbins, D. (2003). Vygotsky’s and A. A. Leontev’s Semiotics and Psycholinguistics: Applications for education, second language acquisition, and theories of language. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Siegel, L., Knell, E., Pei M., Qiang, H. Y., Zhao, W., & Zhao, L. (2009). Teaching English to Chinese-speaking children. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 233–254). Hong Kong, China: Springer, Comparative Education Research Centre, the University of Hong Kong.
Swain, M., & Johnson, R. K. (1997). Immersion education: A category within bilingual education. In R. K. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–338.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Tsui, A. B. M., & Law, D. Y. K. (2007). Learning as boundary-crossing in school-university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1289–1301.
van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London, England: Longman.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Wertsch, J. V. (1981). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: An introduction. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 3–36). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wink, J., & Putney, L. (2002). A vision of Vygotsky. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Zhang, L., & Yan, R. (2007). 不同英语认读教法对儿童词汇认读能力的影响 [Impact of different teaching approaches on English word-reading ability for children]. 幼儿教育(教育科学版) [Early Childhood Education (Educational Sciences)], (6), 8–11.
Zhang, X. Z., & Pei, M. (2005). 小学英语浸入式课程与教学实验中的问题 [Problems in primary school English immersion curriculum and experimental instruction]. 山东师范大学外国语学院学报(基础英语教育) [Journal of Foreign Language Institute of Shandong Normal University (Elementary English Teaching Journal)], 5(7), 9–11.
Zhao, L., & Qiang, H. Y. (2002). 儿童早期第二语言浸入式教学与课程建构研究 [Research on children’s second language immersion and curriculum development. 学前教育研究 [Preschool Education Review], (4), 30–33.
Zhao, W., Zhang, L., Li, W. G., & Gao, X. M. (2007). 上海市幼儿园英语浸入式教学实验研究 [A research report on the results of English immersion in Shanghai kindergartens]. 幼儿教育(教育科学版) [Early Childhood Education (Educational Sciences)], (6), 12–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, X. An analysis of the nature of classroom activities: A comparative study of an immersion English class and a non-immersion English class in the mainland of China. Front. Educ. China 6, 310–330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-011-0134-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-011-0134-2