Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Facilitators and Barriers to Family Involvement in Problem Gambling Treatment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research has shown that family involvement in problem gambling (PG) treatment is important because families are significantly impacted and their involvement can improve treatment outcomes for the family and PG individual. This qualitative study examined facilitators and barriers to family involvement in PG treatment with a sample of PG individuals and family members (n = 11 dyads) receiving treatment at an addiction/mental health treatment centre. The study found that communication, coping skills and support facilitated family involvement; while conflict, isolation, mental health concerns and substance use were barriers to family involvement. There were three types of family involvement among participants in this study including high, moderate and low involvement. Families with high involvement described several facilitators and no barriers to family involvement. They had better treatment outcomes, as well as more positive individual and family functioning. The study demonstrates the importance and complexity of family involvement. Practice and research implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding error.

References

  • Afifi, T. O., Brownridge, D. A., MacMillan, H., & Sareen, J. (2010). The relationship of gambling to intimate partner violence and child maltreatment in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44, 331–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Afifi, T. O., Cox, B. J., Martens, P. J., Sareen, J., & Enns, M. W. (2011). Developing a population health framework for studying problem gambling. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 30(1), 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreae, D. (2011). General systems theory: contributions to social work theory and practice. In F. J. Turner (Ed.), Social work treatment: interlocking theoretical approaches (pp. 242–254). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., Nock, M., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case research designs: strategies for studying behavior change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. W., Shaw, M. C., McCormick, B. A., & Allen, J. (2012). Marital status, childhood maltreatment, and family dysfunction: a controlled study of pathological gambling. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 73, 1293–1297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, K. S., Jorm, A. F., Miller, H. E., Rodda, S. N., Reavley, N. J., Kelly, C. M., & Kitchener, B. A. (2016). How a concerned family member, friend or member of the public can help someone with gambling problems: a Delphi consensus study. BMC Psychology, 4(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughton, R., & Falenchuk, O. (2007). Vulnerability and comorbidity factors of female problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(3), 323–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage.

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., Abbott, M., DeSouza, R., & Bellringer, M. (2007). An overview of help seeking by problem gamblers and their families including barriers to and relevance of services. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5(4), 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copello, A., & Orford, J. (2002). Addiction and the family: is it time for services to take notice of the evidence? Addiction, 97(11), 1361–1363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Copello, A. G., Copello, A. G., Velleman, R. D., & Templeton, L. J. (2005). Family interventions in the treatment of alcohol and drug problems. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24(4), 369–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csiernik, R. (2002). Counseling for the family: the neglected aspect of addiction treatment in Canada. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 2(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darbyshire, P., Oster, C., & Carrig, H. (2001). The experience of pervasive loss: children and young people living in a family where parental gambling is a problem. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(1), 23–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift, V. A., James, E. L., & Kippen, S. (2005). The experience of living with a problem gambler: spouses and partners speak out. Journal of Gambling Issues, 13, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N. A. (2014). The impact of gambling problems on families. Australian Institute of Family Studies: Australian Gambling Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N., Jackson, A. C., Thomas, S. A., & Frydenberg, E. (2010). Children at risk of developing problem gambling. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N. A., Rodda, S. N., Lubman, D. I., & Jackson, A. C. (2014). The impacts of problem gambling on concerned significant others accessing web-based counselling. Addictive Behaviors, 39(8), 1253–1257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dugard, P., File, P., & Todman, J. (2012). Single-case and small-n experimental designs. A practical guide to randomization tests (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferland, F., Fournier, P. M., Ladouceur, R., Brochu, P., Bouchard, M., & Paquet, L. (2008). Consequences of pathological gambling on the gambler and his spouse. Journal of Gambling Issues, 22, 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J. & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index. Final report submitted to the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse (CCSA).

  • Gomes, K., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009). Primed for change: facilitating factors in problem gambling treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(1), 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J. E., Kim, S. W., & Kuskowski, M. (2004). Retrospective review of treatment retention in pathological gambling. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 45(2), 83–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., Tiyce, M., Holdsworth, L., & Nuske, E. (2013). All in the family: help-seeking by significant others of problem gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11(3), 396–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D. C., & el-Guebaly, N. (2004). Retrospective and prospective reports of precipitants to relapse in pathological gambling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(1), 72–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D. C., Peden, N., & Cassidy, E. (2005). The association between comorbidity and outcome in pathological gambling: a prospective follow-up of recent quitters. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(3), 255–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D. C., Shead, N. W., & Makarchuk, K. (2007a). Relationship satisfaction and psychological distress among concerned significant others of pathological gamblers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1(195), 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., Makarchuk, K., Skinner, W., & Vincent, S. (2007b). Minimal treatment approaches for concerned significant others of problem gamblers: a randomized control trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 215–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurcom, C., Copello, A., & Orford, J. (2000). The family and alcohol: effects of excessive drinking and conceptualizations of spouses over recent decades. Substance Use & Misuse, 35(4), 473–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingle, P. J., Marotta, J., McMillan, G., & Wisdom, J. P. (2008). Significant others and problem gambling treatment outcomes. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 381–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kourgiantakis, T. (2016). Family involvement in problem gambling treatment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).

  • Kourgiantakis, T., Saint-Jacques, M. C., & Tremblay, J. (2013). Problem gambling and families: a systematic review. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 13(4), 353–372.

  • Ladouceur, R., Gosselin, P., Laberge, M., & Blaszczynski, A. (2001). Drop-outs in clinical research. Do results reported in the field of addiction reflect clinical reality? The Behavior Therapist, 24, 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. (2002). Well-being by choice not by chance: an integrative system-based couple treatment model for problem gambling. Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, Ontario: Final report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. K., & Awosoga, O. (2015). Congruence couple therapy for pathological gambling: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 1047–1068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B., & Rovers, M. (2008). Bringing torn lives together again. Effects of the first congruence couple therapy application to clients in pathological gambling. International Gambling Studies, 8(1), 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucksted, A., McFarlane, W., Downing, D., Dixon, L., & Adams, C. (2012). Recent developments in family psychoeducation as an evidence-based practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 101–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, K. and Wynne, H. (2003). Fighting the odds. Perspectives. (Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 75-001-XIE), 5–13.

  • Martyres, K., Sundbery, J., & Weir, S. (2015). Addressing problem gambling harm: working with families and friends. Australia: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Retrieved from http://www.responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/18980/Discussion-paper-Family-and-friends.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M., & Volberg, R. (2013). Impact of problem gambling on financial, emotional and social well-being of Singaporean families. International Gambling Studies, 13(1), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., & Saint-Jacques, M.-C. (2000). L’entrevue de recherche. In R. Mayer, F. Ouellet, M.-C. Saint-Jacques, & D. Turcotte (Eds.), Méthodologie de recherche pour les intervenants sociaux (pp. 115–133). Gaëtan Morin Éditeurs: Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComb, J. L., Lee, B. K., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2009). Conceptualizing and treating problem gambling as a family issue. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35(4), 415–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrady, B. S. (2012). Treating alcohol problems with couple therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(5), 514–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrady, B. S., & Epstein, E. E. (2009). Overcoming alcohol problems: a couples-focused program. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, R. J., Dominguez, T. P., & Smith, J. E. (1996). Community reinforcement training with concerned others. In V. B. Hasselt & M. Hersen (Eds.), Sourcebook of psychological treatment manuals for adult disorders (pp. 257–294). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56, 289–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morasco, B. J., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Petry, N. M. (2007). Psychological factors that promote and inhibit pathological gambling. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 14(2), 208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, T. J., & Clements, K. (2012). Review of outcome research on marital and family therapy in treatment for alcoholism. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 122–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J., Templeton, L., Velleman, R., & Copello, A. (2005). Family members of relatives with alcohol, drug and gambling problems: a set of standardized questionnaires for assessing stress, coping and strain. Addiction, 100(11), 1611–1624.

  • Orford, J., Copello, A., Velleman, R., & Templeton, L. (2010). Family members affected by a close relative's addiction: the stress-strain-coping-support model. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 17(sup1), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J., Velleman, R., Natera, G., Templeton, L., & Copello, A. (2013). Addiction in the family is a major but neglected contributor to the global burden of adult ill-health. Social Science & Medicine, 78, 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patford, J. (2007a). The yoke of care: how parents and parents-in-law experience, understand and respond to adult children’s gambling problems. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 13, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patford, J. L. (2007b). Linked lives: adult children’s experiences of late onset parental gambling problems. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5, 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M., & Weiss, L. (2009). Social support is associated with gambling treatment outcomes in pathological gamblers. American Journal on Addictions, 18(5), 402–408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66(5), 564–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piquette, N., & Norman, E. (2013). An all-female problem-gambling counseling treatment: perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 8(1), 51–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rash, C. J., & Petry, N. M. (2014). Psychological treatments for gambling disorder. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 7, 285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rodda, S. N., Lubman, D. I., Dowling, N. A., & McCann, T. V. (2013). Reasons for using web-based counselling among family and friends impacted by problem gambling. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 3(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rychtarik, R. G., & McGillicuddy, N. B. (2006). Preliminary evaluation of a coping skills training program for those with a pathological gambling partner. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 165–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., & Korn, D. A. (2002). Gambling and related mental disorders: a public health analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 23(1), 171–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, W., Kourgiantakis, T., & O’Grady, C. (2013). Family pathways to care, treatment, and recovery. In M. Herie and W. Skinner (Eds.), Fundamentals of addiction: a practical guide for counselors (pp. 295–319). Toronto, ON: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.

  • Steinglass, P. (2008). Family systems and motivational interviewing: a systemic-motivational model for treatment of alcohol and other drug problems. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 26(1–2), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suurvali, H., Hodgins, D., Toneatto, T., & Cunningham, J. (2008). Treatment seeking along Ontario problem gamblers: results of a population survey. Psychiatric Services, 59, 1343–1346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, J., Romild, U., & Shepherdson, E. (2013). The concerned significant others of people with gambling problems in a national representative sample in Sweden–a 1 year follow-up study. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepperman, L., Korn, D. & Reynolds, J. (2006). Partner influences on gambling: an exploratory study. Final report submitted to the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre (OPGRC).

  • Toneatto, T., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Treatment of pathological gambling: a critical review of the literature. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17(4), 284–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, J., Bouchard, G., & Bertrand, K. (2009). Vie conjugale et abus de substances: interrelations et traitement. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy/Revue canadienne de counseling et de psychothérapie, 43(4), 311–323.

  • Tremblay, J., Savard, A. C., Blanchette-Martin, N., Dufour, M., Bertrand, K., Ferland, F., et al. (2015). Integrative couple treatment for pathological gambling/ICT-PG: description of the therapeutic process. Canadian Journal of Addiction, 6(2), 54–61.

  • Trudel, G., Poirier-Arbour, A., Harvey, P., Boyer, R., Villeneuve, V., Anderson, A., & Ouellette-Ngocsoeng, M. (2008). Couple et jeu de hasard. Report submitted to the Fonds Québécois de Recherche sur la Société et la Culture. Montreal: Université du Québec à Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, R., Cousins, J., & Orford, J. (2015). Effects of gambling on the family. In H. Bowden-Jones & S. George (Eds.), A Clinician's guide to working with problem gamblers (pp. 90–103). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, G. G., & Constantine, L. L. (1993). Systems theory. In P.G. Boss, W.J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W.R., Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: a contextual approach (pp. 325–352). New York: Plenum Press.

  • Williams, R.J., Volberg, R.A. & Stevens, R.M.G. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. March 2012.

Download references

Acknowledgements

There are no funding sources for this article.The authors would like to acknowledge the participation of the families and clinicians in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toula Kourgiantakis.

Ethics declarations

All of the participants in this study gave written informed consent and the study was approved by the REB at CAMH (#123/2013) and CÉRUL at Université Laval (#2014–013).

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kourgiantakis, T., Saint-Jacques, MC. & Tremblay, J. Facilitators and Barriers to Family Involvement in Problem Gambling Treatment. Int J Ment Health Addiction 16, 291–312 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9742-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9742-2

Keywords

Navigation