Skip to main content
Log in

Design, analysis, and neural control of a bionic parallel mechanism

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the torso plays an important role in the movement coordination and versatile locomotion of mammals, the structural design and neuromechanical control of a bionic torso have not been fully addressed. In this paper, a parallel mechanism is designed as a bionic torso to improve the agility, coordination, and diversity of robot locomotion. The mechanism consists of 6-degree of freedom actuated parallel joints and can perfectly simulate the bending and stretching of an animal’s torso during walking and running. The overall spatial motion performance of the parallel mechanism is improved by optimizing the structural parameters. Based on this structure, the rhythmic motion of the parallel mechanism is obtained by supporting state analysis. The neural control of the parallel mechanism is realized by constructing a neuromechanical network, which merges the rhythmic signals of the legs and generates the locomotion of the bionic parallel mechanism for different motion patterns. Experimental results show that the complete integrated system can be controlled in real time to achieve proper limb-torso coordination. This coordination enables several different motions with effectiveness and good performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ananthanarayanan A, Azadi M, Kim S. Towards a bio-inspired leg design for high-speed running. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2012, 7(4): 046005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gehring C, Coros S, Hutler M, et al. Practice makes perfect: An optimization-based approach to controlling agile motions for a quadruped robot. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2016, 23(1): 34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manoonpong P, Parlitz U, Wörgötter F. Neural control and adaptive neural forward models for insect-like, energy-efficient, and adaptable locomotion of walking machines. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 2013, 7: 12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schilling N, Hackert R. Sagittal spine movements of small therian mammals during asymmetrical gaits. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2006, 209(19): 3925–3939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng Q, Wang S, Xu W, et al. Quasi passive bounding of a quadruped model with articulated spine. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2012, 52: 232–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hildebrand M. Motions of the running cheetah and horse. Journal of Mammalogy, 1959, 40(4): 481–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Galis F, Carrier D R, van Alphen J, et al. Fast running restricts evolutionary change of the vertebral column in mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(31): 11401–11406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Albiez J, Luksch T, Berns K, et al. A behaviour network concept for controlling walking machines. In: Kimura H, Tsuchiya K, Ishiguro A, et al., eds. Adaptive Motion of Animals and Machines. 1st ed. Tokyo: Springer, 2006, 237–246

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Khoramshahi M, Spröwitz A, Tuleu A, et al. Benefits of an active spine supported bounding locomotion with a small compliant quadruped robot. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Karlsruhe: IEEE, 2013, 3329–3334

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuehn D, Beinersdorf F, Bernhard F, et al. Active spine and feet with increased sensing capabilities for walking robots. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space. Karlsruhe: i-SAIRAS, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Takuma T, Ikeda M, Masuda T. Facilitating multi-modal locomotion in a quadruped robot utilizing passive oscillation of the spine structure. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Taipei: IEEE, 2010, 4940–4945

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haynes G C, Pusey J, Knopf R, et al. Laboratory on legs: An architecture for adjustable morphology with legged robots. Proceedings of SPIE: Unmanned Systems Technology XIV, 2012, 8387: 786–796

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seok S, Wang A, Chuah M Y, et al. Design principles for highly efficient quadrupeds and implementation on the MIT Cheetah robot. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Karlsruhe: IEEE, 2013, 3307–3312

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao Q, Ellenberger B, Sumioka H, et al. The effect of spine actuation and stiffness on a pneumatically-driven quadruped robot for cheetah-like locomotion. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). Shenzhen: IEEE, 2013, 1807–1812

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khosravi M A, Taghirad H D. Robust PID control of fully-constrained cable driven parallel robots. Mechatronics, 2014, 24(2): 87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao J, Wang P, Yang T, et al. Design of anovel modal space sliding mode controller for electro-hydraulic driven multi-dimensional force loading parallel mechanism. Instrument Society of America Transaction, 2020, 99: 374–386

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ghasemi J, Moradinezhad R, Hosseini M A. Kinematic synthesis of parallel manipulator via neural network approach. International Journal of Engineering, 2019, 30(9): 1319–1325

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xu J, Du Y, Chen Y H, et al. Bivariate optimization for control design of interconnected uncertain nonlinear systems: A fuzzy set-theoretic approach. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20(6): 1715–1729

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhen S, Zhao H, Huang K, et al. A novel optimal robust control design of fuzzy mechanical systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2015, 23(6): 2012–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Faber M, Johnston C, Schamhardt H C, et al. Three-dimensional kinematics of the equine spine during canter. Equine Veterinary Journal, 2001, 33(S33): 145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smeathers J E. A mechanical analysis of the mammalian lumber spine. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Reading: University of Reading, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grondin D E, Potvin J R. Effects of trunk muscle fatigue and load timing on spinal responses during sudden hand loading. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2009, 19(4): e237–e245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Coros S, Karpathy A, Jones B, et al. Locomotion skills for simulated quadrupeds. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2011, 30(4): 59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu Y, Jin B, Li W, et al. Optimal design of a hexapod walking robot based on energy consumption and workspace. Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 38(3): 305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Macpherson J M, Ye Y. The cat vertebral column: Stance configuration and range of motion. Experimental Brain Research, 1998, 119(3): 324–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Faber M, Schamhardt H, Weeren R, et al. Basic three-dimensional kinematics of the vertebral column of horses walking on a treadmill. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 2000, 61(4): 399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Faber M, Johnston C, Schamhardt H C, et al. Basic three-dimensional kinematics of the vertebral column of horses trotting on a treadmill. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 2001, 62(5): 757–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu Y, Zhou S, Gao D, et al. Synchronization of non-linear oscillators for neurobiologically inspired control on a bionic parallel waist of legged robot. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 2019, 13: 59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu Y, Wu Y, Liu Q, et al. A backward control based on σ-Hopf oscillator with decoupled parameters for smooth locomotion of bio-inspired legged robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2018, 106: 165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Patricia W, Katherine K, Cornejo F. Primate Conservation Education. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016, 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  31. Deban S M, Schilling N, Carrier D R. Activity of extrinsic limb muscles in dogs at walk, trot and gallop. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2012, 215(2): 287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sabelhaus A P, Akella A K, Ahmad Z A, et al. Model-predictive control of a flexible spine robot. In: Proceedings of 2017 American Control Conference (ACC). Seattle: IEEE, 2017

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Kawasaki R, Sato R, Kazama E, et al. Development of a flexible coupled spine mechanism for a small quadruped robot. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). Qingdao: IEEE, 2016

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Danner S M, Wilshin S D, Shevtsova N A, et al. Central control of interlimb coordination and speed dependent gait expression in quadrupeds. Journal of Physiology, 2016, 594(23): 6947–6967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu Y G, Zhang L, Manoonpong P. Virtual motoneuron activation for goal-directed locomotion of a hexapod robot. In: Proceedings of 2020 5th International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM). Shenzhen: IEEE, 2020, 380–386

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu Y, Zhang L, Manoonpong P. Generic mechanism for waveform regulation and synchronization of oscillators: An application for robot behavior diversity generation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2020 (in press)

  37. Thor M, Manoonpong P. Error-based learning mechanism for fast online adaptation in robot motor control. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2019, 31(6): 2042–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ren G, Chen W, Dasgupta S, et al. Multiple chaotic central pattern generators with learning for legged locomotion and malfunction compensation. Information Sciences, 2015, 294: 666–682

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51605039), in part by the Shaanxi International Science and Technology Cooperation Project (Grant No. 2020KW-064), in part by the Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power Transmission and Control (Grant No. GZKF-201923), in part by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018T111005), in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. 300102259308 and 300102259401), and in part by the China Scholarship Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaguang Zhu.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary material, approximately 16.8 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 18.9 MB.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Zhou, S., Poramate, M. et al. Design, analysis, and neural control of a bionic parallel mechanism. Front. Mech. Eng. 16, 468–486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-021-0640-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-021-0640-8

Keywords

Navigation