Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of suitable geometrical parameters for designing a tendon-driven under-actuated mechanical finger

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to optimize the geometrical parameters of an under-actuated mechanical finger by conducting a theoretical analysis of these parameters. The finger is actuated by a flexion tendon and an extension tendon. The considered parameters are the tendon guide positions with respect to the hinges. By applying such an optimization, the correct kinematical and dynamical behavior of the closing cycle of the finger can be obtained. The results of this study are useful for avoiding the snapthrough and the single joint hyperflexion, which are the two breakdowns most frequently observed during experimentation on prototypes. Diagrams are established to identify the optimum values for the tendon guides position of a finger with specified dimensions. The findings of this study can serve as guide for future finger design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bicchi A. Hands for dexterous manipulation and robust grasping: A difficult road toward simplicity. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2000, 16(6): 652–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biagiotti L, Lotti F, Melchiorri C, et al. Design aspects for advanced robot hands. In: Proceedings of 2002 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Lausanne: IEEE, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown C Y, Asada H H. Inter-finger coordination and postural synergies in robot hands via mechanical implementation of principal components analysis. In: Proceedings of 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Diego: IEEE, 2007, 2877–2882

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dechev N, Cleghorn W L, Naumann S. Multiple finger, passive adaptive grasp prosthetic hand. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2001, 36(10): 1157–1173

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gosselin C, Pelletier F, Laliberté T. An anthropomorphic underactuated robotic hand with 15 dofs and a single actuator. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Pasadena: IEEE, 2008, 749–754

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Baril M, Laliberté T, Gosselin C, et al. On the design of a mechanically programmable underactuated anthropomorphic prosthetic gripper. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2013, 135(12): 121008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Catalano M G, Grioli G, Serio A, et al. Adaptive synergies for a humanoid robot hand. In: Proceedings of 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. Osaka: IEEE, 2012, 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  8. Penta F, Rossi C, Savino S. An underactuated finger for a robotic hand. International Journal of Mechanics and Control, 2014, 15(2): 63–68

    Google Scholar 

  9. Penta P, Rossi C, Savino S. Gripping analysis of an underactuated finger. In: Borangiu T, ed. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Volume 371). Springer International Publishing, 2015, 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  10. Niola V, Penta F, Rossi C, et al. An underactuated mechanical hand: Theoretical studies and prototyping. International Journal of Mechanics and Control, 2015, 16(1): 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rossi C, Savino S. An underactuated multi-finger grasping device. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2014, 11(1): 201

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi C, Savino S, Niola V, et al. A study of a robotic hand with tendon driven fingers. Robotica, 2015, 33(5): 1034–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carbone G, Rossi C, Savino S. Performance comparison between FEDERICA Hand and LARM Hand. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2015, 12: 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Niola V, Rossi C, Savino S, et al. An underactuated mechanical hand prosthesys by IFToMM Italy. In: Proceedings of the 14th IFToMM World Congress. Taipei, 2015, 415–420

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hirose S, Umetani Y. The development of soft gripper for versatile robot hand. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1978, 13(3): 351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Townsend W. The BarretHand grasper—Programmably flexible part handling and assembly. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2000, 27(3): 181–188

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Birglen L, Kragten G A, Herder J L. Underactuated Grasping—Special Issue in the Journal of Mechanical Sciences. Göttingen: Copernicus Publications, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaneko M, Higashimori M, Takenaka R, et al. The 100 G capturing robot—Too fast to see. IEEE/ASME Transaction on Mechatronics, 2003, 8(1): 37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Laliberté T, Birglen L, Gosselin C M. Underactuation in robotic grasping hands. Japanese Journal of Machine Intelligence & Robotic Control, 2002, 4(3): 77–87

    Google Scholar 

  20. Doria M, Birglen L. Design of an underactuated compliant gripper for surgery using nitinol. Journal of Medical Devices, 2009, 3(1): 011007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zottola M, Ceccarelli M. Underactuated finger mechanism for LARM Hand. In: Ceccarelli M, Glazunov V A. eds. Advances on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators. Springer International Publishing, 2014, 283–291

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson C A, Dessauw E, Saiter J M, et al. Design of a compliant underactuated robotic finger with coordinated stiffness. In: Proceedings of ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013, V06BT07A017–V06BT07A017

    Google Scholar 

  23. Groenewegen M W, Aguirre M E, Herder J L. Design of a partially compliant, three-phalanx underactuated prosthetic finger. In: Proceedings of ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015, V05AT08A040–V05AT08A040

    Google Scholar 

  24. Niola V, Rossi C, Savino S, et al. Robot trajectory planning by points and tangents. In: Proceedings of 10th WSEAS International Conference on Robotics, Control and Manufacturing Technology. Hangzhou, 2010, 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rossi C, Savino S. Robot trajectory planning by assigning positions and tangential velocities. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2013, 29(1): 139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, 80125, Italy

    Francesco Penta, Cesare Rossi & Sergio Savino

Authors
  1. Francesco Penta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cesare Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sergio Savino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesare Rossi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Penta, F., Rossi, C. & Savino, S. Analysis of suitable geometrical parameters for designing a tendon-driven under-actuated mechanical finger. Front. Mech. Eng. 11, 184–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-016-0385-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-016-0385-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation