Skip to main content
Log in

A strategy of the rural governance for territorial spatial planning in China

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rural spatial governance has become an important part of the spatial governance system under the unified management of urban and rural spaces. In-depth theoretical and practical research on rural spatial governance in terms of promoting national spatial planning can help improve the planning and regulation system of rural space. Beginning with a description of rural spatial governance, this paper constructs a theoretical analysis framework of rural spatial governance based on the comprehensive perspective of spatial governance. The study also discusses the internal processes and feasible paths of rural spatial governance in territorial spatial planning and outlines the theoretical and practical research for enhancing rural spatial governance. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Rural spatial governance starts with the coordination theory of human-land relationships in the rural regional system. Through planning and negotiation, governance has effective regulation of rural space and allocates spatial rights in an orderly manner. Rural spatial governance highlights the comprehensive governance processes that combine “top-down” and “bottom-up” participation by multiple subjects. (2) Through the “action-efficiency-target” system, the comprehensive governance analysis framework of “matter-organization-ownership” in rural space provides an effective scheme for constructing rural spatial governance. Rural spatial governance is characterized by both rigidity and flexibility, the interaction between physical space and spatial relationships, and the superposition of spatial ownership and spatial organization. (3) The rural spatial governance features of interconnecting various scales (regional-village-plot) are conducive to improving the rural spatial governance system. (4) The governance means, participation modes, and value-sharing mechanisms of rural spatial governance help enrich the territorial spatial planning system, promote the integration of multiple regulations, refine the regulation of land use, and ensure good rural governance and ecological governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cejudo E, Navarro F, 2020. Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas: Results and Lessons. Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Liu X, Huang Z et al., 2019. Co-construction: A path to high-quality rural revitalization. City Planning Review, 43(3): 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esparcia J, Escribano J, Serrano J J, 2015. From development to power relations and territorial governance: Increasing the leadership role of LEADER local action groups in Spain. Journal of Rural Studies, 42: 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, 2017. Perspective of China’s spatial governance system after 19th CPC National Congress. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32(4): 396–404. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Jie, 2020. High-quality development of national territory space governance and regional economic layout during 14th Five-Year Plan in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 35(7): 796–805. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(22): 570–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisvoll S, 2012. Power in the production of spaces transformed by rural tourism. Journal of Rural Studies, 28: 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge D, Long H, 2020. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(6): 1272–1286. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge D, Long H, Qiao W et al., 2020a. Effects of rural-urban migration on agricultural transformation: A case of Yucheng City, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 76: 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge D, Long H, Zhang Y et al., 2018. Farmland transition and its influences on grain production in China. Land Use Policy, 70: 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge D, Zhou G, Qiao W et al., 2020b. Land use transition and rural spatial governance: Mechanism, framework and perspectives. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(8): 1325–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree K, 2007. Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2): 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H, 1974. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Wu T, Zhang Y et al., 2019. Thoughts on unifying the regulation of territorial space use. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10): 2200–2208. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, 2014. Economic geography for spatial governance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(8): 1109–1116. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, 2020. The basic theory and methodology of rural revitalization planning in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(6): 1120–1113. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wang Y, 2019. Rural land engineering and poverty alleviation: Lessons from typical regions in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(5): 643–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Yang R, Long H et al., 2014. Implications of land-use change in rural China: A case study of Yucheng, Shandong province. Land Use Policy, 40: 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long H, 2014. Land consolidation: An indispensable way of spatial restructuring in rural China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(4): 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long H, 2020. Land Use Transitions and Rural Restructuring in China. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Long H, Qu Y, Tu S et al., 2020. Development of land use transitions research in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(7): 1195–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long H, Zhang Y, 2020. Rural planning in China: Evolving theories, approaches, and trends. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(5): 782–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon D, 2002. Rural governance and local involvement: Assessing state community relations in the Scottish Highlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 18: 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng P, Wang Q, Lang H et al., 2019. Analysis of the challenges and reform orientation of territorial spatial planning system in China under the background of spatial governance system modernization: Reviews from the serial research of territorial spatial governance. China Land Science, 33(11): 8–14. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro F A, Woods M, Cejudo E, 2016. The LEADER initiative has been a victim of its own success: The decline of the bottom-up approach in rural development programmes: The cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(2): 270–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Li B, Dong J et al., 2020. Basic logic of territorial ecological restoration. China Land Science, 34(5): 18–26. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shucksmith M, Brown D L, 2016. Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woods M, 2011. Rural. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, 2017. Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism. Urban Studies, 55(7): 1383–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Xu Q, Long H, 2016. Spatial distribution characteristics and optimized reconstruction analysis of China’s rural settlements during the process of rapid urbanization. Journal of Rural Studies, 47: 413–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye C, Liu Z, 2020. Rural-urban co-governance: Multi-scale practice. Science Bulletin, 65(10): 778–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Xia T. 2019. The change and reconstruction of spatial planning system under the goal of modern national governance. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10): 2040–2050. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Zhou C, Che L et al., 2020. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(5): 724–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dazhuan Ge.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41901204; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, No2019M660109, No.2021T140303; The Foundation of Humanity and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education of China, No.19YJCZH036; Jiangsu Provincial Science Foundation, No.BK20190717; Jiangsu Provincial Social Science Foundation, No.19GLC002

Author: Ge Dazhuan (1987-), PhD, specialized in rural spatial governance and spatial use regulation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, D., Lu, Y. A strategy of the rural governance for territorial spatial planning in China. J. Geogr. Sci. 31, 1349–1364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1900-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1900-6

Keywords

Navigation