Abstract
Rural spatial governance has become an important part of the spatial governance system under the unified management of urban and rural spaces. In-depth theoretical and practical research on rural spatial governance in terms of promoting national spatial planning can help improve the planning and regulation system of rural space. Beginning with a description of rural spatial governance, this paper constructs a theoretical analysis framework of rural spatial governance based on the comprehensive perspective of spatial governance. The study also discusses the internal processes and feasible paths of rural spatial governance in territorial spatial planning and outlines the theoretical and practical research for enhancing rural spatial governance. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Rural spatial governance starts with the coordination theory of human-land relationships in the rural regional system. Through planning and negotiation, governance has effective regulation of rural space and allocates spatial rights in an orderly manner. Rural spatial governance highlights the comprehensive governance processes that combine “top-down” and “bottom-up” participation by multiple subjects. (2) Through the “action-efficiency-target” system, the comprehensive governance analysis framework of “matter-organization-ownership” in rural space provides an effective scheme for constructing rural spatial governance. Rural spatial governance is characterized by both rigidity and flexibility, the interaction between physical space and spatial relationships, and the superposition of spatial ownership and spatial organization. (3) The rural spatial governance features of interconnecting various scales (regional-village-plot) are conducive to improving the rural spatial governance system. (4) The governance means, participation modes, and value-sharing mechanisms of rural spatial governance help enrich the territorial spatial planning system, promote the integration of multiple regulations, refine the regulation of land use, and ensure good rural governance and ecological governance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cejudo E, Navarro F, 2020. Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas: Results and Lessons. Switzerland: Springer.
Chen Q, Liu X, Huang Z et al., 2019. Co-construction: A path to high-quality rural revitalization. City Planning Review, 43(3): 67–74.
Esparcia J, Escribano J, Serrano J J, 2015. From development to power relations and territorial governance: Increasing the leadership role of LEADER local action groups in Spain. Journal of Rural Studies, 42: 29–42.
Fan J, 2017. Perspective of China’s spatial governance system after 19th CPC National Congress. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32(4): 396–404. (in Chinese)
Fan Jie, 2020. High-quality development of national territory space governance and regional economic layout during 14th Five-Year Plan in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 35(7): 796–805. (in Chinese)
Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(22): 570–574.
Frisvoll S, 2012. Power in the production of spaces transformed by rural tourism. Journal of Rural Studies, 28: 447–457.
Ge D, Long H, 2020. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(6): 1272–1286. (in Chinese)
Ge D, Long H, Qiao W et al., 2020a. Effects of rural-urban migration on agricultural transformation: A case of Yucheng City, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 76: 85–95.
Ge D, Long H, Zhang Y et al., 2018. Farmland transition and its influences on grain production in China. Land Use Policy, 70: 94–105.
Ge D, Zhou G, Qiao W et al., 2020b. Land use transition and rural spatial governance: Mechanism, framework and perspectives. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(8): 1325–1340.
Halfacree K, 2007. Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2): 125–141.
Lefebvre H, 1974. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lin J, Wu T, Zhang Y et al., 2019. Thoughts on unifying the regulation of territorial space use. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10): 2200–2208. (in Chinese)
Liu W, 2014. Economic geography for spatial governance. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(8): 1109–1116. (in Chinese)
Liu Y, 2020. The basic theory and methodology of rural revitalization planning in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(6): 1120–1113. (in Chinese)
Liu Y, Wang Y, 2019. Rural land engineering and poverty alleviation: Lessons from typical regions in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(5): 643–657.
Liu Y, Yang R, Long H et al., 2014. Implications of land-use change in rural China: A case study of Yucheng, Shandong province. Land Use Policy, 40: 111–118.
Long H, 2014. Land consolidation: An indispensable way of spatial restructuring in rural China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(4): 211–225.
Long H, 2020. Land Use Transitions and Rural Restructuring in China. Singapore: Springer.
Long H, Qu Y, Tu S et al., 2020. Development of land use transitions research in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(7): 1195–1214.
Long H, Zhang Y, 2020. Rural planning in China: Evolving theories, approaches, and trends. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(5): 782–786.
MacKinnon D, 2002. Rural governance and local involvement: Assessing state community relations in the Scottish Highlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 18: 307–324.
Meng P, Wang Q, Lang H et al., 2019. Analysis of the challenges and reform orientation of territorial spatial planning system in China under the background of spatial governance system modernization: Reviews from the serial research of territorial spatial governance. China Land Science, 33(11): 8–14. (in Chinese)
Navarro F A, Woods M, Cejudo E, 2016. The LEADER initiative has been a victim of its own success: The decline of the bottom-up approach in rural development programmes: The cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(2): 270–288.
Peng J, Li B, Dong J et al., 2020. Basic logic of territorial ecological restoration. China Land Science, 34(5): 18–26. (in Chinese)
Shucksmith M, Brown D L, 2016. Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies. New York: Routledge.
Woods M, 2011. Rural. New York: Routledge.
Wu F, 2017. Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism. Urban Studies, 55(7): 1383–1399.
Yang R, Xu Q, Long H, 2016. Spatial distribution characteristics and optimized reconstruction analysis of China’s rural settlements during the process of rapid urbanization. Journal of Rural Studies, 47: 413–424.
Ye C, Liu Z, 2020. Rural-urban co-governance: Multi-scale practice. Science Bulletin, 65(10): 778–780.
Zhang J, Xia T. 2019. The change and reconstruction of spatial planning system under the goal of modern national governance. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10): 2040–2050. (in Chinese)
Zhou L, Zhou C, Che L et al., 2020. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(5): 724–742.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41901204; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, No2019M660109, No.2021T140303; The Foundation of Humanity and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education of China, No.19YJCZH036; Jiangsu Provincial Science Foundation, No.BK20190717; Jiangsu Provincial Social Science Foundation, No.19GLC002
Author: Ge Dazhuan (1987-), PhD, specialized in rural spatial governance and spatial use regulation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ge, D., Lu, Y. A strategy of the rural governance for territorial spatial planning in China. J. Geogr. Sci. 31, 1349–1364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1900-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1900-6