Skip to main content
Log in

Location patterns of urban industry in Shanghai and implications for sustainability

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China’s economy has undergone rapid transition and industrial restructuring. The term “urban industry” describes a particular type of industry within Chinese cities experiencing restructuring. Given the high percentage of industrial firms that have either closed or relocated from city centres to the urban fringe and beyond, emergent global cities such as Shanghai, are implementing strategies for local economic and urban development, which involve urban industrial upgrading numerous firms in the city centre and urban fringe. This study aims to analyze the location patterns of seven urban industrial sectors within the Shanghai urban region using 2008 micro-geography data. To avoid Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) issue, four distance-based measures including nearest neighbourhood analysis, Kernel density estimation, K-function and co-location quotient have been extensively applied to analyze and compare the concentration and co-location between the seven sectors. The results reveal disparate patterns varying with distance and interesting co-location as well. The results are as follows: the city centre and the urban fringe have the highest intensity of urban industrial firms, but the zones with 20–30 km from the city centre is a watershed for most categories; the degree of concentration varies with distance, weaker at shorter distance, increasing up to the maximum distance of 30 km and then decreasing until 50 km; for all urban industries, there are three types of patterns, mixture of clustered, random and dispersed distribution at a varied range of distances. Consequently, this paper argues that the location pattern of urban industry reflects the stage-specific industrial restructuring and spatial transformation, conditioned by sustainability objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert J M, Casanova M R, Orts V, 2012. Spatial location patterns of Spanish manufacturing firms. Papers in Regional Science, 91(1): 107–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00375.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbia G, Espa G, Quah D, 2008. A class of spatial econometric methods in the empirical analysis of clusters of firms in the space. Empirical Economics, 34: 81–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0154-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai C E, Du Y, Tao Z et al., 2004. Local protectionism and regional specialization: Evidence from China’s industries. Journal of International Economics, 63: 397–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00070-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens K, Bougna T, 2015. An anatomy of the geographical concentration of Canadian manufacturing industries. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 51: 47–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Jefferson G H, Zhang J, 2011. Structural change, productivity growth and industrial transformation in China. China Economic Review, 22(1): 133–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng F, van Oort F, Geertman S et al., 2014. Science parks and the co-location of high-tech small- and mediumsized firms in China’s Shenzhen. Urban Studies, 51(5): 1073–1089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098013493020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromley E K, Wilson-Genderson M, Christman Z et al., 2015. Colocation of older adults with successful aging based on objective and subjective measures. Applied Geography, 56: 13–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.apgeog.2014.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromley R G, Hanink D M, Bentley G C, 2014. Geographically weighted colocation quotients: Specification and application. The Professional Geographer, 66(1): 138–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2013.768130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Glaeser E, 1997. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, 105: 889–927. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w4840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Chuanglin, Liu Xiaoli, 2009. Temporal and spatial differences and imbalance of China’s urbanization development during 1950–2006. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 19(6): 719–732. http://www.geogsci.com/ EN/10.1007/s11442-009-0719-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Krugman P R, Venables A J, 2004. The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 86(1): 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.t01-1-00065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Boyang, Liu Weidong, Michael Dunford, 2014. State land policy, land markets and geographies of manufacturing: The case of Beijing, China. Land Use Policy, 36: 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaubatz P, 1999. China’s urban transformation: Patterns and processes of morphological changes in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Urban Studies, 36(9): 1495–1521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0042098992890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He C, Wang J, 2012. Regional and sectoral differences in the spatial restructuring of Chinese manufacturing industries during the post-WTO period. GeoJournal, 77(3): 361–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9396-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He C, Wei Y D, Xie X, 2008. Globalization, institutional change, and industrial location: Economic transition and industrial concentration in China. Regional Studies, 42(7): 923–945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/003434007-01543272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu C, Xu Z, Yashiro N, 2015. Agglomeration and productivity in China: Firm level evidence. China Economic Review, 33: 50–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2015.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koster H R A, van Ommeren J, Rietveld P, 2014. Estimation of semiparametric sorting models: Explaining geographical concentration of business services. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 44: 14–28. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P, 1991a. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P, 1991b. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99: 483–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w3275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie T F, Frankenfeld C L, Makara M A, 2012. The spatial food environment of the DC metropolitan area: Clustering, co-location, and categorical differentiation. Applied Geography, 35(1/2): 300–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie T F, Kronenfeld B J, 2011. The colocation quotient: A new measure of spatial association between cate gorical subsets of points. Geographical Analysis, 43(3): 306–326. http://dx.doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2011.00821.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, 2014. Global and local: Measuring geographical concentration of China’s manufacturing industries. The Professional Geographer, 66(2): 284–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2013.784953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Tao Z, 2009. Trends and determinants of China’s industrial agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(2): 167–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Li, Jin Fengjun, Song Zhouying et al., 2013. Spatial coupling analysis of regional economic development and environmental pollution in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(3): 525–537. http://www.geogsci.com/EN/10.1007/s11442-013-1026-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A, 1890. Principles of Economics. London: MacMillan.

  • Pan F, Xia Y, 2013. Location and agglomeration of headquarters of publicly listed firms within China’s urban system. Geographical Research, 35(5): 757–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian Z, 2012. Post-reform urban restructuring in China: The case of Hangzhou 1990–2010. Town Planning Review, 83 (4):431–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2012.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley B D, 1976. The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. Journal of Applied Probability, 13(2): 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley B D, 1977. Modelling spatial patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society–Series B (Methodological), 39: 172–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley B D, 1979. Test of ‘randomness’ for spatial point patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society–Series B (Methodological), 41: 368–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Municipal Statistics Bureau (SMSB), 2009. Shanghai Statistical Yearbook (2008). Beijing: China Statistics Press.

  • Shanghai Municipal Statistics Bureau (SMSB), 2011. Shanghai Statistical Yearbook (2010). Beijing: China Statistics Press.

  • Südekum J, 2006. Concentration and specialisation trends in Germany since Reunification. Regional Studies, 40(8): 861–873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400600985087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler W R, 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, 46: 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voinea C L, van Kranenburg H, 2011. Colocation patterns of foreign-owned firms in a small open economy: Evidence from the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 19(12): 2047–2072. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 09654313.2011.633823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen M, 2004. Relocation and agglomeration of Chinese industry. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1): 329–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi H, Cai Y, 2013. Discussion on urban industrial space organizations and the formation mechanism of Shanghai. E-Journal of China Urban Studies, 8(2): 102–109. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, 2012. Restructuring the export-oriented industrialization in the Pearl River Delta, China: Institutional evolution and emerging tension. Applied Geography, 32(1): 143–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Hao P, Cai J, 2015. Economic clusters: A bridge between economic and spatial policies in the case of Beijing. Cities, 42(Part B): 171–185. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan F, Wei Y D, Chen W, 2014. Economic transition, industrial location and corporate networks: Remaking the Sunan Model in Wuxi City, China. Habitat International, 42: 58–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianquan Cheng.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41571124

Author: Cao Weidong, PhD and Professor, specialized in industrial geography.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, W., Li, Y., Cheng, J. et al. Location patterns of urban industry in Shanghai and implications for sustainability. J. Geogr. Sci. 27, 857–878 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1410-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1410-8

Keywords

Navigation