Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental results and analysis of sparse microwave imaging from spaceborne radar raw data

  • Research Paper
  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sparse microwave imaging is a novel radar framework aiming to bring revolutions to the microwave imaging according to the theory of sparse signal processing. As compressive sensing (CS) is introduced to synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging in recent years, the current SAR sparse imaging methods have shown their advantages over the traditional matched filtering methods. However, the requirement for these methods to process the compressed range data results in the increase of the hardware complexity. So the SAR sparse imaging method that directly uses the raw data is needed. This paper describes the method of SAR sparse imaging with raw data directly, presents the analysis of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the echo signal by combining the traditional radar equation with the compressive sensing theory, and provides the tests on 2-D simulated SAR data. The simulation results demonstrate the validity of the SNR analysis, and the good performance of the proposed method while a large percentage of the raw data is dropped. An experiment with RadarSat-1 raw data is also carried out to show the feasibility of processing the real SAR data via the method proposed in this paper. Our method is helpful for designing new SAR systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curlander J C, McDonough R N. Synthetic Aperture Radar: Systems and Signal Processing. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1991

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cumming I G, Wong F H. Digital Processing of Synthetic Aperture Radar Data: Algorithms and Implementation. MA: Artech House Inc, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  3. Raney R K, Runge H, Bamler R, et al. Precision SAR processing using chirp scaling. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens, 1994, 32: 786–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donoho D L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inform Theor, 2006, 52: 1289–1306

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Candès E J, Tao T. Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encodeing strategies. IEEE Trans Inform Theor, 2006, 52: 5406–5425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Candès E J, Romberg J, Tao T. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Comm Pure Appl Math, 2006, 59: 1207–1233

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Baraniuk R G, Steeghs P. Compressive radar imaging. In: IEEE Radar Conference, Boston, 2007. 128–133

  8. Ender J H G. On compressive sensing applied to radar. Signal Process Spec Sec Statis Signal Array Process, 2010, 90: 1402–1414

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel V M, Easley G R, Healy J, et al. Compressed synthetic aperture radar. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process, 2010, 4: 244–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang B C, Jiang H, Hong W, et al. Synthetic aperture radar imaging of sparse targets via compressed sensing. In: 8th EuSAR, Aachen, 2010. 1–4

  11. Alonso M T, Dekker P L, Mallorqu’i J J. A novel strategy for radar imaging based on compressive sensing. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens, 2010, 48: 4285–4295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herman M A, Strohmer T. High-resolution radar via compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2009, 57: 2275–2284

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin Y G, Zhang B C, Jiang H, et al. Multi-channel SAR imaging based on distributed compressive sensing. Sci China Inf Sci, 2012, 55: 245–259

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Candès E J, Tao T. Decoding by linear programming. IEEE Trans Inform Theor, 2005, 51: 4203–4215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mallat S, Zhang Z. Matching pursuit with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 1993, 41: 3397–3415

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Tropp J A, Gilbert A C. Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans Inform Theor, 2007, 53: 4655–4666

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Daubechies I, Defriese M, DeMol C. An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint. Comm Pure Appl Math, 2004, 57: 1413–1457

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Beck A, Teboulle M. A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J Imag Sci, 2009, 2: 183–202

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Candès E J, Wakin M. An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 2008, 25: 21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hennenfent G, Herrmann F J. Simply denoise: wavefield reconstruction via jittered undersampling. Geophysics, 2008, 73: 19–28

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aeron S, Saligrama V, Zhao M. Information theoretic bounds for compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inform Theor, 2010, 56: 5111–5130

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChengLong Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, C., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z. et al. Experimental results and analysis of sparse microwave imaging from spaceborne radar raw data. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 55, 1801–1815 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-012-4634-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-012-4634-3

Keywords

Navigation