Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of daily pan evaporation using partial least squares regression

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presented the application of partial least squares regression (PLSR) in estimating daily pan evaporation by utilizing the unique feature of PLSR in eliminating collinearity issues in predictor variables. The climate variables and daily pan evaporation data measured at two weather stations located near Elephant Butte Reservoir, New Mexico, USA and a weather station located in Shanshan County, Xinjiang, China were used in the study. The nonlinear relationship between climate variables and daily pan evaporation was successfully modeled using PLSR approach by solving collinearity that exists in the climate variables. The modeling results were compared to artificial neural networks (ANN) models with the same input variables. The results showed that the nonlinear equations developed using PLSR has similar performance with complex ANN approach for the study sites. The modeling process was straightforward and the equations were simpler and more explicit than the ANN black-box models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Penman H L. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings, Royal Society of London, 1948, 193: 120–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohler M A, Nordenson T J, Fox W E. Evaporation from Pans on Lakes. Weather Bureau Research Paper 38. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, 1955

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tan S B K, Shuy E B, Chua L H C. Modelling hourly and daily open-water evaporation rates in areas with an equatorial climate. Hydrol Process, 2007, 21(4): 486–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stephens J C, Stewart E H. A Comparison of Procedures for Computing Evaporation and Evapotranspiration. Publication 62, International Association of Scientific Hydrology. International Union of Geodynamics and Geophysics, Berkeley, CA. 1963. 123–133

    Google Scholar 

  5. Priestley C H B, Taylor R J. On the assessment of the surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Rev, 1972, 100: 81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Linacre E T. A simple formula for estimating evaporation rates in various climates, using temperature data alone. Agric Met, 1977, 18(6): 409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanson C L. Prediction of Class A pan evaporation in southwest Idaho. J Irrig Drain Eng, 1989, ASCE 115(2): 166–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kovoor G M, Nandagiri L. Developing regression models for predicting pan evaporation from climatic data—A comparison of multiple least-squares, principal components, and partial leastsquares approaches. J Irrigd Drain Eng, 2007, 133(5): 444–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shirsath P B, Singh A K. A comparative study of daily pan evaporation estimation using ANN, regression and climate based models. Water Resour Manage, 2010, 24: 1571–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y. Study on water surface evaporation forecasting based on single correlation coefficient. Groundwater, 2010, 32(2): 113–114

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sudheer K P, Gosain A K, Rangan D M, et al. Modelling evaporation using an artificial neural network algorithm. Hydrol Process, 2002, 16: 3189–3202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruton J M, McClendon R W, Hoogenboom G. Estimating daily pan evaporation with artificial neural networks. Trans ASAE, 2000, 43(2): 491–496

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keskin M E, Terzi O. Artificial neural network models of daily pan evaporation. J. Hydrol Eng, 2006, 11(1): 65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jin L, Shen S H, Luo Y, et al. Study on ANN calculation of water surface evaporation. J Nanjing Institute of Meteorology, 1996, 19(3): 342–347

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keskin M E, Terzi O, Taylan D. Fuzzy logic model approaches to daily pan evaporation estimation in western Turkey. Hydrol Sci J, 2004, 49(6): 1001–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Terzi O, Keskin M E, Taylan E D. Estimating evaporation using ANFIS. J Irrig Drain Eng, 2006, 132(5): 503–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eslamian S, Gohari S A, Biabanaki M, et al. Estimation of monthly pan evaporation using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. J Appl Sci, 2008, 8(19): 3497–3502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Artificial neural network in hydrology: hydrologic applications. J Hydrol Eng, 2000, 5: 124–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Geladi P, Kowalski B. Partial least squares regression: A tutorial. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1986, 185: 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner M H. Applied Linear Regression Models. 2nd ed. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1989

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abdi H. Partial least squares regression. In: Lewis-Beck M, Bryman A, Futing T, eds. The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Sciences Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003. 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tootle G A, Singh A K, Piechota T C, et al. Long lead-time forecasting of U.S. streamflow using partial least squares regression. J Hydrol Eng, 2007, 12(5): 442–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wold H. Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares. In: Krishnaiah P R, ed. Multivariate Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1966. 391–420

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wold S. PLS for multivariate linear modeling. In: van de Waterbeemd H ed. QSAR: Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design, Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry. Weinheim: Verlag-Chemie, 1994. 195–218

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kim T, Valdes J B. Nonlinear model for drought forecasting based on a conjunction of wavelet transforms and neural networks. J Hydrol Eng, 2003, 8(6): 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Coulibaly P, Anctil F, Bobée B. Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach. J Hydrol, 2000, 3(4): 244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dibike Y B, Solomatine D P. River flow forecasting using artificial neural networks. J Phys Chem Earth, Part B: Hydrol, Oceans Atmos, 2001, 26(1): 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McCuen R H, Rawls W J, Whaley B L. Comparative evaluation of statistical methods for water supply forecasting. Water Resour Bull, 1979, 15(4): 935–947

    Google Scholar 

  29. Garen D C. Improved techniques in regression-based streamflow volume forecasting. J Water Res PL-ASCE, 1992, 118(6): 654–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McCuen R H. Statistical Methods for Engineers. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  31. NeuroDimension, Inc. NeuroSolutions Getting Started Manual Version 5, 2009

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shalamu Abudu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abudu, S., Cui, C., King, J.P. et al. Modeling of daily pan evaporation using partial least squares regression. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54, 163–174 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4205-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4205-z

Keywords

Navigation