Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

EMDS 3.0: A modeling framework for coping with complexity in environmental assessment and planning

  • Published:
Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Ecosystem Management Decision Support (EMDS) system is an application framework for knowledge-based decision support of ecological assessments at any geographic scale. The system integrates state-of-the-art geographic information system (GIS) as well as knowledge-based reasoning and decision modeling technologies to provide decision support for a substantial portion of the adaptive management process of ecosystem management. EMDS 3.0 is implemented as an ArcMap® extension and integrates the logic engine of NetWeaver® to perform landscape evaluations, and the decision modeling engine of Criterium DecisionPlus® for evaluating management priorities. Key features of the system’s evaluation component include abilities to (1) reason about large, abstract, multi-faceted ecosystem management problems, (2) perform useful evaluations with incomplete information, (3) evaluate the influence of missing information, and (4) determine priorities for missing information. A key feature of the planning component is the ability to determine priorities for management activities, taking into account not only ecosystem condition, but also criteria that account for the feasibility and efficacy of potential management actions. Both components include powerful and intuitive diagnostic features that facilitate communicating the explanation of modeling results to a broad audience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reynolds K M. EMDS users guide (version 2.0): knowledge-based decision support for ecological assessment, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-470, Portland, Oregon: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reynolds K M, Rodriguez S, Bevans K. User guide for the Ecosystem Management Decision Support System, version 3.0, Redlands, California: Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saaty T L. Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytical Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saaty T L. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh. Pennsylvania: RWS Publications, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets. Inf Cont, 1965, 8: 338–353

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Zadeh L A. Probability measures of fuzzy events. J. Math Anal Appl, 1968, 23: 421–427

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Part I. Information Science, 1975, 8: 199–249

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Part II. Information Science, 1975, 8: 301–357

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Part III. Information Science, 1976, 9: 43–80

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaufmann A. Introduction to the theory of fuzzy subsets, Volume 1, Fundamental Theoretical Elements. New York: Academic Press, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blonda P, Bennardo A, Satalino G, et al. Fuzzy logic and neural techniques integration: an application to remotely sensed data. Pattern Recognit Lett, 1996, 17: 1343–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holland J M. Using fuzzy logic to evaluate environmental threats. Sensors, 1994, 11: 57–61

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moraczewski I R. Fuzzy logic for phytosociology 1: Syntaxa as vague concepts, Vegetatio, 1993, 106: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moraczewski I R. Fuzzy logic for phytosociology 2: Generalizations and prediction, Vegetatio, 1993, 106: 13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Openshaw S. Fuzzy logic as a new scientific paradigm for doing geography, Environment & Planning A, 1996, 28: 761–766

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salski A, Sperlbaum C. Fuzzy logic approach to modelling in ecosystem research. Lect Notes Comp Sci, 1991, 20: 520–527

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith P N. A fuzzy logic evaluation method for environmental assessment, J Environ Syst, 1995, 24: 275–285

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith P N. Environmental project evaluation: a fuzzy logic based method. Int J Syst Sci, 1997, 28: 467–474

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Anonymous, Fuzzy logic applied to catchment modeling, Water & Wastewater International, 1994, 9: 40–43.

  20. Baum B A, Tovinkere V, Titlow J, et al. Automated cloud classification of global AVHRR data using a fuzzy logic approach. J Appl Meteorol, 1997, 6: 1519–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hahn A, Pfeiffenberger P, Wirsam B, et al. Evaluation and optimization of nutrient supply by fuzzy logic, Ernahrungs-Umschau, 1995, 42: 367–375

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mays M D, Bogardi I, Bardossy A. Fuzzy logic and risk-based soil interpretations, Geoderma, 1997, 77: 299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McBratney A B, Odeh I O A. Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: Fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma, 1997, 77: 85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ranst E Van, Tang H, Groenemans R, et al. Application of fuzzy logic to land suitability for rubber production in peninsular Thailand. Geoderma, 1996 70: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ray D, Reynolds K, Slade J, et al. A spatial solution to ecological site classification for british forestry using ecosystem management decision support. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference on GeoComputation Conference. Bristol, UK, September 17–19, 1998, published on CD-ROM, 1998

  26. Reynolds K, Jensen M, Andreasen J, et al. Knowledge-based assessment of watershed condition. Comput Electron Agric, 1999, 27: 315–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bourgeron P S, Humphries HC, Reynolds K M. Conducting large-scale conservation evaluation and conservation area selection using a knowledge-based system. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, 2–8 September 2000, Banff, Alberta, 2000

  28. Schmoldt D L, Rauscher H M. Building Knowledge-Based Systems for Natural Resource Management. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  29. Saunders M C, Coulson R N, Folse J. Applications of artificial intelligence in agriculture and natural resource management. In: Kent A, Willeams J, eds. Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology. Volume 25, Supplement 10, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1990, 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stone N D, Coulson R N, Frisbie R E, et al. Expert systems in entomology: three approaches to problem solving. Bull Entomol Soc Am, 1986, 32: 161–66

    Google Scholar 

  31. Edwards W. How to use multi-attribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, 1977, 7: 326–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Edwards W, Newman J R. Multi-attribute Evaluation, Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kamenetzky R. The relationship between the analytical hierarchy process and the additive value function. Decis Sci, 1982, 13: 702–716

    Google Scholar 

  34. Maser C, Bormann B T, Brookes M H, et al. Sustainable forestry through adaptive ecosystem management is an open-ended experiment. In: ed. C Maser, Sustainable Forestry: Philosophy, Science, and Economics, Delray Beach, Florida: St. Lucie Press, 1994, 303–340

    Google Scholar 

  35. Davis L S, Johnson K N, Bettinger P S, et al. Forest Management to Sustain Ecological, Economic, and Social Values, 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Dept. Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA

    Keith M. Reynolds

Authors
  1. Keith M. Reynolds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reynolds, K.M. EMDS 3.0: A modeling framework for coping with complexity in environmental assessment and planning. SCI CHINA SER E 49 (Suppl 1), 63–75 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-006-8108-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-006-8108-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation