Abstract
This paper considers the practical applications of the article, Ethical Oversight of Student Data in Learning Analytics: A Typology Derived from a Cross-continental, Cross-institutional Perspective by Willis et al. (Educ Technol Res Dev 64: 881–901, 2016). Students engaging in online learning leave behind vast quantities of data. In 2020, the rapid shift to online learning during the global pandemic allowed virtual data collection to outpace procedures and policies that promote ethical analysis. The mere availability of data does not confer ethical collection of data. Further, analysis of data under the assumption of learning outcomes does not necessarily ensure justice or learning for students. This article offers possible applications of the heuristic by Willis et al. (Educ Technol Res Dev 64: 881–901, 2016) for ethical learning analytics in order to mitigate harm to students. It extends their work by suggesting educators consider the racialized encoding of data themselves, and argues that every act of surveillance during the pandemic creates norms for future surveillance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baepler, P., & Murdoch, C. J. (2010). Academic analytics and data mining in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 1–9.
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. Social Forces.
Manolev, J., Sullivan, A., & Slee, R. (2019). The datafication of discipline: ClassDojo, surveillance and a performative classroom culture. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 36–51.
Sin, K., & Muthu, L. (2015). Application of big data in education data mining and learning analytics: A literature review. ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, 5(4).
West, D. M. (2012). Big data for education: Data mining, data analytics, and web dashboards. Governance Studies at Brookings, 4(1), 1–10.
Willis, J. E., Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2016). Ethical oversight of student data in learning analytics: A typology derived from a cross-continental, cross-institutional perspective. Education Technology Research & Development, 64, 881–901.
Yadav, S. K., Pal, S., & Bharadwaj, B. (2012). Data mining applications: A comparative study for predicting student’s performance. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Creative Engineering, 1, 13–19.
Zuboff, S. (2019). Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. New labor forum (Vol. 28, pp. 10–29). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no known conflicts of interest.
Research involving human and/or animals participants
This research involved neither human participants nor animals.
Informed consent
As such, no informed consent was necessary to the research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Targeted Manuscript: Willis, J.E., Slade, S. & Prinsloo, P. Ethical oversight of student data in learning analytics: a typology derived from a cross-continental, cross-institutional perspective. Education Tech Research Dev 64, 881–901 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9463-4
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heath, M.K. Buried treasure or Ill-gotten spoils: the ethics of data mining and learning analytics in online instruction. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 331–334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09841-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09841-x